Literature DB >> 28214915

Evaluation of the GARD assay in a blind Cosmetics Europe study.

Henrik Johansson1, Robin Gradin1, Andy Forreryd2, Maria Agemark1, Kathrin Zeller2, Angelica Johansson1, Olivia Larne1, Erwin van Vliet3, Carl Borrebaeck2, Malin Lindstedt2.   

Abstract

Chemical hypersensitivity is an immunological response towards foreign substances, commonly referred to as sensitizers, which gives rise primarily to the clinical symptoms known as allergic contact dermatitis. For the purpose of mitigating risks associated with consumer products, chemicals are screened for sensitizing effects. Historically, such predictive screenings have been performed using animal models. However, due to industrial and regulatory demand, animal models for the purpose of sensitization assessment are being replaced by non-animal testing methods, a global trend that is spreading across industries and market segments. To meet this demand, the Genomic Allergen Rapid Detection (GARD) assay was developed. GARD is a novel, cell-based assay that utilizes the innate recognition of xenobiotic substances by dendritic cells, as measured by a multivariate readout of genomic biomarkers. Following cellular stimulation, chemicals are classified as sensitizers or non-sensitizers based on induced transcriptional profiles. Recently, a number of non-animal methods were comparatively evaluated by Cosmetics Europe, using a coherent and blinded test panel of reference chemicals with human and local lymph node assay data, comprising a wide range of sensitizers and non-sensitizers. The outcome of the GARD assay is presented in this paper. It was demonstrated that GARD is a highly functional assay with a predictive performance of 83% in this Cosmetics Europe dataset. The average accumulated predictive accuracy of GARD across independent datasets was 86% for skin sensitization hazard.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GARD; alternative methods; in vitro; sensitization; predictive accuracy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28214915     DOI: 10.14573/altex.1701121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ALTEX        ISSN: 1868-596X            Impact factor:   6.043


  3 in total

Review 1.  Skin and respiratory chemical allergy: confluence and divergence in a hybrid adverse outcome pathway.

Authors:  Ian Kimber; Alan Poole; David A Basketter
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 3.524

2.  Validation of the GARD™skin Assay for Assessment of Chemical Skin Sensitizers: Ring Trial Results of Predictive Performance and Reproducibility.

Authors:  Henrik Johansson; Robin Gradin; Angelica Johansson; Els Adriaens; Amber Edwards; Veronika Zuckerstätter; Anders Jerre; Florence Burleson; Helge Gehrke; Erwin L Roggen
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  The GARDpotency Assay for Potency-Associated Subclassification of Chemical Skin Sensitizers-Rationale, Method Development, and Ring Trial Results of Predictive Performance and Reproducibility.

Authors:  Robin Gradin; Angelica Johansson; Andy Forreryd; Emil Aaltonen; Anders Jerre; Olivia Larne; Ulrika Mattson; Henrik Johansson
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.849

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.