Lisa Zimmer1, Susmitha Apuri2, Zeynep Eroglu3, Lisa A Kottschade4, Andrea Forschner5, Ralf Gutzmer6, Max Schlaak7, Lucie Heinzerling8, Angela M Krackhardt9, Carmen Loquai10, Svetomir N Markovic4, Richard W Joseph4, Kelly Markey3, Jochen S Utikal11, Carsten Weishaupt12, Simone M Goldinger13, Vernon K Sondak3, Jonathan S Zager3, Dirk Schadendorf14, Nikhil I Khushalani3. 1. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, University Duisburg-Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: lisa.zimmer@uk-essen.de. 2. Hematology/Oncology Fellowship Program, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute/University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA. 3. Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA. 4. Department of Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 5. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany. 6. Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Skin Cancer Center Hannover, Hannover Medical School, Germany. 7. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Cologne, Skin Cancer Center, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO) Köln Bonn, Germany. 8. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Germany. 9. III. Medical Department, Technische Universität München (TUM) Munich, Germany. 10. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Mainz, Germany. 11. Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany. 12. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Münster, Germany. 13. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland. 14. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, University Duisburg-Essen, Germany & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors pembrolizumab and nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab have shown improved objective response rates and progression-free survival compared to ipilimumab only in advanced melanoma patients. Anti-PD-1 therapy demonstrated nearly equal clinical efficacy in patients who had progressed after ipilimumab or were treatment-naïve. However, only limited evidence exists regarding the efficacy of ipilimumab alone or in combination with nivolumab after treatment failure to anti-PD-therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study in advanced melanoma patients who were treated with nivolumab (1 or 3 mg/kg) and ipilimumab (1 mg or 3 mg/kg) or ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) alone after treatment failure to anti-PD-1 therapy was performed. Patient, tumour, pre- and post-treatment characteristics were analysed. RESULTS: In total, 47 patients were treated with ipilimumab (ipi-group) and 37 patients with ipilimumab and nivolumab (combination-group) after treatment failure to anti-PD-1 therapy. Overall response rates for the ipi- and the combination-group were 16% and 21%, respectively. Disease control rate was 42% for the ipi-group and 33% for the combination-group. One-year overall survival rates for the ipi- and the combination-group were 54% and 55%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ipilimumab should be considered as a viable treatment option for patients with failure to prior anti-PD-1 therapy, including those with progressive disease as best response to prior anti-PD-1. In contrast, the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab appears significantly less effective in this setting compared to treatment-naïve patients.
BACKGROUND: The anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors pembrolizumab and nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab have shown improved objective response rates and progression-free survival compared to ipilimumab only in advanced melanomapatients. Anti-PD-1 therapy demonstrated nearly equal clinical efficacy in patients who had progressed after ipilimumab or were treatment-naïve. However, only limited evidence exists regarding the efficacy of ipilimumab alone or in combination with nivolumab after treatment failure to anti-PD-therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study in advanced melanomapatients who were treated with nivolumab (1 or 3 mg/kg) and ipilimumab (1 mg or 3 mg/kg) or ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) alone after treatment failure to anti-PD-1 therapy was performed. Patient, tumour, pre- and post-treatment characteristics were analysed. RESULTS: In total, 47 patients were treated with ipilimumab (ipi-group) and 37 patients with ipilimumab and nivolumab (combination-group) after treatment failure to anti-PD-1 therapy. Overall response rates for the ipi- and the combination-group were 16% and 21%, respectively. Disease control rate was 42% for the ipi-group and 33% for the combination-group. One-year overall survival rates for the ipi- and the combination-group were 54% and 55%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Ipilimumab should be considered as a viable treatment option for patients with failure to prior anti-PD-1 therapy, including those with progressive disease as best response to prior anti-PD-1. In contrast, the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab appears significantly less effective in this setting compared to treatment-naïve patients.
Authors: Dylan J Martini; Yuan Liu; Julie M Shabto; Colleen Lewis; Meredith R Kline; Hannah Collins; Mehmet Akce; Haydn T Kissick; Bradley C Carthon; Walid L Shaib; Olatunji B Alese; Rathi N Pillai; Conor E Steuer; Christina S Wu; David H Lawson; Ragini R Kudchadkar; Viraj A Master; Bassel F El-Rayes; Suresh S Ramalingam; Taofeek K Owonikoko; R Donald Harvey; Mehmet Asim Bilen Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2019-02-06 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Dan A Erkes; Conroy O Field; Claudia Capparelli; Manoela Tiago; Timothy J Purwin; Inna Chervoneva; Adam C Berger; Edward J Hartsough; Jessie Villanueva; Andrew E Aplin Journal: Pigment Cell Melanoma Res Date: 2019-05-20 Impact factor: 4.693
Authors: April K S Salama; Manisha Palta; Christel N Rushing; M Angelica Selim; Kristen N Linney; Brian G Czito; David S Yoo; Brent A Hanks; Georgia M Beasley; Paul J Mosca; Chelsae Dumbauld; Katelyn N Steadman; John S Yi; Kent J Weinhold; Douglas S Tyler; Walter T Lee; David M Brizel Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-11-10 Impact factor: 12.531