Literature DB >> 28214219

Perpetuating stigma or reducing risk? Perspectives from naloxone consumers and pharmacists on pharmacy-based naloxone in 2 states.

Traci C Green, Patricia Case, Haley Fiske, Janette Baird, Shachan Cabral, Dina Burstein, Victoriana Schwartz, Nathan Potter, Alexander Y Walley, Jeffrey Bratberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Little is known about attitudes of pharmacists and consumers to pharmacy naloxone. We examined perceptions and experiences of pharmacy naloxone from people with opioid use disorder, patients taking chronic opioids for pain, caregivers of opioid users, and pharmacists from 2 early pharmacy naloxone adopter states: Massachusetts and Rhode Island.
DESIGN: Eight focus groups (4 per state) were held in October to December 2015. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants were recruited from pharmacies, health clinics, and community organizations; pharmacists were recruited from professional organizations and pharmacy colleges. OUTCOME MEASURES: Focus groups were led by trained qualitative researchers using a topic guide, and recorded and transcribed for analysis. Five analysts developed and applied a coding scheme to transcripts. Thematic analysis involved synthesis of coded data and connections between key themes, with comparisons across the groups.
RESULTS: Sixty-one participants included patients with chronic pain (n = 15), people with opioid use disorders (n = 19), caregivers (n = 16), and pharmacists (n = 11). A majority of pharmacists had dispensed naloxone to patients; a minority of all consumer participants had obtained pharmacy naloxone. Four themes emerged: consumer fear of future consequences if requesting naloxone; pharmacists' concerns about practice logistics related to naloxone; differing perceptions of how opioid safety is addressed in the pharmacy; and solutions to addressing these barriers. Whereas consumer groups differed in awareness of naloxone and availability at pharmacies, all groups expressed support for the pharmacist's role and preferences for a universal offer of naloxone based on clear criteria.
CONCLUSION: Pharmacies complement community naloxone provision to patients and caregivers. To overcome stigma of naloxone receipt, increased public awareness of naloxone and pharmacist training about naloxone and addiction are required. Pharmacists should offer naloxone via universal opt-out strategies-where all patients meeting evidence-based criteria are offered naloxone-rather than targeted or opt-in strategies-where only patients perceived as high risk or patients who request it are offered naloxone.
Copyright © 2017 American Pharmacists Association®. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28214219     DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2017.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)        ISSN: 1086-5802


  37 in total

1.  Beliefs Associated with Pharmacy-Based Naloxone: a Qualitative Study of Pharmacy-Based Naloxone Purchasers and People at Risk for Opioid Overdose.

Authors:  Elizabeth Donovan; Patricia Case; Jeffrey P Bratberg; Janette Baird; Dina Burstein; Alexander Y Walley; Traci C Green
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Community pharmacist engagement in opioid use disorder prevention and treatment behaviors: A descriptive analysis.

Authors:  Aaron Salwan; Nicholas E Hagemeier; Fred Tudiver; KariLynn Dowling-McClay; Kelly N Foster; Jessie Arnold; Arsham Alamian; Robert P Pack
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2020-07-12

3.  Evaluation of naloxone furnishing community pharmacies in San Francisco.

Authors:  Andy M Nguyen; Thomas E Kearney; Dorie E Apollonio
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2020-09-15

4.  Legal requirements and recommendations to prescribe naloxone.

Authors:  Rebecca L Haffajee; Samantha Cherney; Rosanna Smart
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  Barriers to naloxone use and acceptance among opioid users, first responders, and emergency department providers in New Hampshire, USA.

Authors:  Sarah Bessen; Stephen A Metcalf; Elizabeth C Saunders; Sarah K Moore; Andrea Meier; Bethany McLeman; Olivia Walsh; Lisa A Marsch
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2019-10-04

6.  Pharmacists' experiences with a statewide naloxone standing order program in Massachusetts: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Robin A Pollini; Susannah Slocum; Jenny Ozga; Rebecca Joyce; Ziming Xuan; Traci C Green; Alexander Y Walley
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2021-08-23

7.  Laws Mandating Coprescription of Naloxone and Their Impact on Naloxone Prescription in Five US States, 2014-2018.

Authors:  Traci C Green; Corey Davis; Ziming Xuan; Alexander Y Walley; Jeffrey Bratberg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Assessing pharmacy-based naloxone access using an innovative purchase trial methodology.

Authors:  Robin A Pollini; Rebecca Joyce; Jenny E Ozga-Hess; Ziming Xuan; Traci C Green; Alexander Y Walley
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2020-07-08

9.  Community Pharmacist Utilization of Legislation That Allows Impact on the Opioid Crisis in the State of Minnesota: A Mixed-Methods Approach.

Authors:  Laura Palombi; Amanda N Hawthorne; Scott Lunos; Kelsey Melgaard; Ashley Dahly; Heather Blue
Journal:  J Pharm Pract       Date:  2019-04-14

10.  Effectiveness and implementability of state-level naloxone access policies: Expert consensus from an online modified-Delphi process.

Authors:  Rosanna Smart; Sean Grant
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2021-07-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.