Literature DB >> 28213567

Vitamin D receptor as a target for breast cancer therapy.

Alyson Murray1, Stephen F Madden2, Naoise C Synnott3, Rut Klinger4, Darran O'Connor5, Norma O'Donovan6, William Gallagher4, John Crown7, Michael J Duffy3,8.   

Abstract

Considerable epidemiological evidence suggests that high levels of circulating vitamin D (VD) are associated with a decreased incidence and increased survival from cancer, i.e., VD may possess anti-cancer properties. The aim of this investigation was therefore to investigate the anti-cancer potential of a low calcaemic vitamin D analogue, i.e., inecalcitol and compare it with the active form of vitamin D, i.e., calcitriol, in a panel of breast cancer cell lines (n = 15). Using the MTT assay, IC50 concentrations for response to calcitriol varied from 0.12 µM to >20 µM, whereas those for inecalcitol were significantly lower, ranging from 2.5 nM to 63 nM (P = 0.001). Sensitivity to calcitriol and inecalcitol was higher in VD receptor (VDR)-positive compared to VDR-negative cell lines (P = 0.0007 and 0.0080, respectively) and in ER-positive compared to ER-negative cell lines (P = 0.043 and 0.005, respectively). Using RNA-seq analysis, substantial but not complete overlap was found between genes differentially regulated by calcitriol and inecalcitol. In particular, significantly enriched gene ontology terms such as cell surface signalling and cell communication were found after treatment with inecalcitol but not with calcitriol. In contrast, ossification and bone morphogenesis were found significantly enriched after treatment with calcitriol but not with inecalcitol. Our preclinical results suggest that calcitriol and inecalcitol can inhibit breast cancer cell line growth, especially in cells expressing ER and VDR. As inecalcitol is significantly more potent than calcitriol and has low calcaemic potential, it should be further investigated for the treatment of breast cancer.
© 2017 Society for Endocrinology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; calcitriol; inecalcitol; oestrogen receptors; vitamin D; vitamin D receptor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28213567     DOI: 10.1530/ERC-16-0463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer        ISSN: 1351-0088            Impact factor:   5.678


  14 in total

1.  The Combination of the CDK4/6 Inhibitor, Palbociclib, With the Vitamin D3 Analog, Inecalcitol, Has Potent In Vitro and In Vivo Anticancer Effects in Hormone-Sensitive Breast Cancer, But Has a More Limited Effect in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Justine Vanhevel; Lieve Verlinden; Shauni Loopmans; Stefanie Doms; Iris Janssens; Sien Bevers; Steve Stegen; Hans Wildiers; Annemieke Verstuyf
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 6.055

2.  Vitamin D receptor (VDR) expression in different molecular subtypes of canine mammary carcinoma.

Authors:  R Sánchez-Céspedes; M D Fernández-Martínez; A I Raya; C Pineda; I López; Y Millán
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Fluorescence Analysis of Vitamin D Receptor Status of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCS) in Breast Cancer: From Cell Models to Metastatic Patients.

Authors:  Xi Zhang; Simone Hofmann; Brigitte Rack; Nadia Harbeck; Udo Jeschke; Sophie Sixou
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Trends in vitamin D supplement use in a general female and breast cancer population in Ireland: A repeated cross-sectional study.

Authors:  J M Madden; M J Duffy; L Zgaga; K Bennett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  p62 functions as an oncogene in colorectal cancer through inhibiting apoptosis and promoting cell proliferation by interacting with the vitamin D receptor.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Suzhen Yang; Bing Xu; Ting Wang; Ying Zheng; Fei Liu; Fenggang Ren; Jiong Jiang; Haitao Shi; Baicang Zou; Xiaolan Lu; Shemin Lu; Lei Dong
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 6.831

6.  Vitamin D receptor expression in invasive breast tumors and breast cancer survival.

Authors:  Linnea Huss; Salma Tunå Butt; Signe Borgquist; Karin Elebro; Malte Sandsveden; Ann Rosendahl; Jonas Manjer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  Prognostic role of vitamin D receptor in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Haiyan Xu; Zhenhua Liu; Hongtai Shi; Chunbin Wang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Differential Impact of Calcitriol and Its Analogs on Tumor Stroma in Young and Aged Ovariectomized Mice Bearing 4T1 Mammary Gland Cancer.

Authors:  Artur Anisiewicz; Agata Pawlik; Beata Filip-Psurska; Joanna Wietrzyk
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  The Emerging Role of Vitamin D and Vitamin D Receptor in Diabetic Nephropathy.

Authors:  Min Lei; Zhangsuo Liu; Jia Guo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  The Role of PPARγ Ligands in Breast Cancer: From Basic Research to Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Giuseppina Augimeri; Cinzia Giordano; Luca Gelsomino; Pierluigi Plastina; Ines Barone; Stefania Catalano; Sebastiano Andò; Daniela Bonofiglio
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.