Literature DB >> 28213145

How are you feeling?: A personalized methodology for predicting mental states from temporally observable physical and behavioral information.

Suppawong Tuarob1, Conrad S Tucker2, Soundar Kumara2, C Lee Giles3, Aaron L Pincus4, David E Conroy5, Nilam Ram6.   

Abstract

It is believed that anomalous mental states such as stress and anxiety not only cause suffering for the individuals, but also lead to tragedies in some extreme cases. The ability to predict the mental state of an individual at both current and future time periods could prove critical to healthcare practitioners. Currently, the practical way to predict an individual's mental state is through mental examinations that involve psychological experts performing the evaluations. However, such methods can be time and resource consuming, mitigating their broad applicability to a wide population. Furthermore, some individuals may also be unaware of their mental states or may feel uncomfortable to express themselves during the evaluations. Hence, their anomalous mental states could remain undetected for a prolonged period of time. The objective of this work is to demonstrate the ability of using advanced machine learning based approaches to generate mathematical models that predict current and future mental states of an individual. The problem of mental state prediction is transformed into the time series forecasting problem, where an individual is represented as a multivariate time series stream of monitored physical and behavioral attributes. A personalized mathematical model is then automatically generated to capture the dependencies among these attributes, which is used for prediction of mental states for each individual. In particular, we first illustrate the drawbacks of traditional multivariate time series forecasting methodologies such as vector autoregression. Then, we show that such issues could be mitigated by using machine learning regression techniques which are modified for capturing temporal dependencies in time series data. A case study using the data from 150 human participants illustrates that the proposed machine learning based forecasting methods are more suitable for high-dimensional psychological data than the traditional vector autoregressive model in terms of both magnitude of error and directional accuracy. These results not only present a successful usage of machine learning techniques in psychological studies, but also serve as a building block for multiple medical applications that could rely on an automated system to gauge individuals' mental states.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Machine learning; Mental state prediction; Multivariate time series

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28213145      PMCID: PMC5453908          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  46 in total

1.  TERVA: system for long-term monitoring of wellness at home.

Authors:  I Korhonen; T Iivainen; R Lappalainen; T Tuomisto; T Kööbi; V Pentikäinen; M Tuomisto; V Turjanmaa
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.536

2.  Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being.

Authors:  James J Gross; Oliver P John
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2003-08

3.  The path to personalized medicine.

Authors:  Margaret A Hamburg; Francis S Collins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The Satisfaction With Life Scale.

Authors:  E Diener; R A Emmons; R J Larsen; S Griffin
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  1985-02

5.  Examining the Interplay of Processes Across Multiple Time-Scales: Illustration With the Intraindividual Study of Affect, Health, and Interpersonal Behavior (iSAHIB).

Authors:  Nilam Ram; David E Conroy; Aaron L Pincus; Amy Lorek; Amanda Rebar; Michael J Roche; Michael Coccia; Jennifer Morack; Josh Feldman; Denis Gerstorf
Journal:  Res Hum Dev       Date:  2014-05-14

6.  A global measure of perceived stress.

Authors:  S Cohen; T Kamarck; R Mermelstein
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1983-12

7.  Predicting longitudinal changes in caregiver physical and mental health: a stress process model.

Authors:  K T Goode; W E Haley; D L Roth; G R Ford
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  Reliable screening for neuropsychological impairment in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Ralph H B Benedict; Darcy Cox; Laetitia L Thompson; Fred Foley; Bianca Weinstock-Guttman; Frederick Munschauer
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.312

9.  cStress: Towards a Gold Standard for Continuous Stress Assessment in the Mobile Environment.

Authors:  Karen Hovsepian; Mustafa al'Absi; Emre Ertin; Thomas Kamarck; Motohiro Nakajima; Santosh Kumar
Journal:  Proc ACM Int Conf Ubiquitous Comput       Date:  2015-09

10.  Mobile Phone Sensor Correlates of Depressive Symptom Severity in Daily-Life Behavior: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Sohrab Saeb; Mi Zhang; Christopher J Karr; Stephen M Schueller; Marya E Corden; Konrad P Kording; David C Mohr
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  5 in total

1.  Prediction of stress and drug craving ninety minutes in the future with passively collected GPS data.

Authors:  David H Epstein; Matthew Tyburski; William J Kowalczyk; Albert J Burgess-Hull; Karran A Phillips; Brenda L Curtis; Kenzie L Preston
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-03-04

2.  Individualized Modeling to Distinguish Between High and Low Arousal States Using Physiological Data.

Authors:  Ame Osotsi; Zita Oravecz; Qunhua Li; Joshua Smyth; Timothy R Brick
Journal:  J Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2020-01-22

3.  Using Machine Learning to Derive Just-In-Time and Personalized Predictors of Stress: Observational Study Bridging the Gap Between Nomothetic and Ideographic Approaches.

Authors:  Alan Rozet; Ian M Kronish; Joseph E Schwartz; Karina W Davidson
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Why Loneliness Interventions Are Unsuccessful: A Call for Precision Health.

Authors:  Samia C Akhter-Khan; Rhoda Au
Journal:  Adv Geriatr Med Res       Date:  2020-06-17

5.  Prediction of stress and drug craving ninety minutes in the future with passively collected GPS data.

Authors:  David H Epstein; Matthew Tyburski; William J Kowalczyk; Albert J Burgess-Hull; Karran A Phillips; Brenda L Curtis; Kenzie L Preston
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-03-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.