Literature DB >> 28213102

Comparison of Multiplate and VerifyNow platelet function tests in predicting clinical outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Peter D Larsen1, Ana S Holley2, Alexander Sasse3, Ali Al-Sinan4, Sarah Fairley3, Scott A Harding3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study examined the ability of two widely used "point of care" platelet function assays, VerifyNow and Multiplate, to predict adverse outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS).
METHODS: We examined platelet reactivity using VerifyNow and Multiplate P2Y12 assays in patients with ACS and the relationship between platelet reactivity and both MACE (defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis and unplanned revascularisation) and TIMI major bleeding at 1year.
RESULTS: In 619 ACS patients, 65 patients (10.5%) had experienced MACE at 1year and 6 patients (1%) had TIMI major bleeding events. The two measures of platelet reactivity were only moderately correlated (Rho=0.43, p=0.0001). Both measures demonstrated a statistically significant relationship with MACE, with area under the curve for VerifyNow of 0.632 (0.001) and for Multiplate of 0.577 (p=0.04), and neither measure showed a significant relationship with bleeding. Logistic regression analysis found that only VerifyNow was a statistical predictor of MACE (p=0.01). MACE occurred in 16% of those classified as having HPR using VerifyNow compared to 7% in those without HPR (odds ratio of 2.6 (95% CI 1.5-4.4, p=0.001). In those classified as having HPR by the Multiplate assay, MACE occurred in 13% compared to 9% of those without HPR (Odds ratio 1.5 95% CI 0.9-2.5, p=0.11).
CONCLUSION: The two points of care platelet function tests examined in this study were only moderately correlated. The VerifyNow assay demonstrated a stronger relationship to MACE than the Multiplate assay.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute myocardial infarction; Antiplatelet agents; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Point-of-care testing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28213102     DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2017.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Res        ISSN: 0049-3848            Impact factor:   3.944


  5 in total

1.  Using NGS-methylation profiling to understand the molecular pathogenesis of young MI patients who have subsequent cardiac events.

Authors:  Michelle Thunders; Ana Holley; Scott Harding; Peter Stockwell; Peter Larsen
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 4.528

2.  Morphine in acute coronary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gonçalo Silva Duarte; Afonso Nunes-Ferreira; Filipe Brogueira Rodrigues; Fausto J Pinto; Joaquim J Ferreira; Joao Costa; Daniel Caldeira
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Relation of High Lipoprotein (a) Concentrations to Platelet Reactivity in Individuals with and Without Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Rocío Salsoso; Talia F Dalcoquio; Remo H M Furtado; André Franci; Carlos J D G Barbosa; Paulo R R Genestreti; Celia M C Strunz; Viviane Lima; Luciano M Baracioli; Robert P Giugliano; Shaun G Goodman; Paul A Gurbel; Raul C Maranhão; Jose C Nicolau
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 4.  De-Escalation of Antiplatelet Treatment in Patients with Myocardial Infarction Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Review of the Current Literature.

Authors:  Daniel Mf Claassens; Dirk Sibbing
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity Affects the Extent of Ischemic Lesions in Stroke Patients Due to Large-Vessel Disease.

Authors:  Adam Wiśniewski; Joanna Sikora; Agata Sławińska; Karolina Filipska; Aleksandra Karczmarska-Wódzka; Zbigniew Serafin; Grzegorz Kozera
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.