Literature DB >> 28212109

Sustainable exposure prevention through innovative detection and remediation technologies from the NIEHS Superfund Research Program.

Heather F Henry, William A Suk.   

Abstract

Innovative devices and tools for exposure assessment and remediation play an integral role in preventing exposure to hazardous substances. New solutions for detecting and remediating organic, inorganic, and mixtures of contaminants can improve public health as a means of primary prevention. Using a public health prevention model, detection and remediation technologies contribute to primary prevention as tools to identify areas of high risk (e.g. contamination hotspots), to recognize hazards (bioassay tests), and to prevent exposure through contaminant cleanups. Primary prevention success is ultimately governed by the widespread acceptance of the prevention tool. And, in like fashion, detection and remediation technologies must convey technical and sustainability advantages to be adopted for use. Hence, sustainability - economic, environmental, and societal - drives innovation in detection and remediation technology. The National Institute of Health (NIH) National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) Superfund Research Program (SRP) is mandated to advance innovative detection, remediation, and toxicity screening technology development through grants to universities and small businesses. SRP recognizes the importance of fast, accurate, robust, and advanced detection technologies that allow for portable real-time, on-site characterization, monitoring, and assessment of contaminant concentration and/or toxicity. Advances in non-targeted screening, biological-based assays, passive sampling devices (PSDs), sophisticated modeling approaches, and precision-based analytical tools are making it easier to quickly identify hazardous "hotspots" and, therefore, prevent exposures. Innovation in sustainable remediation uses a variety of approaches: in situ remediation; harnessing the natural catalytic properties of biological processes (such as bioremediation and phytotechnologies); and application of novel materials science (such as nanotechnology, advanced membranes, new carbon materials, and materials reuse). Collectively, the investment in new technologies shows promise to reduce the amount and toxicity of hazardous substances in the environment. This manuscript highlights SRP funded innovative devices and tools for exposure assessment and remediation of organic, inorganic, and mixtures of contaminants with a particular focus on sustainable technologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28212109      PMCID: PMC7291821          DOI: 10.1515/reveh-2016-0037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Environ Health        ISSN: 0048-7554            Impact factor:   3.458


  21 in total

Review 1.  Cellulose nanomaterials in water treatment technologies.

Authors:  Alexis Wells Carpenter; Charles-François de Lannoy; Mark R Wiesner
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Cleaning Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Contaminated Garden Soil by Phytoremediation.

Authors:  Richard E Meggo; Jerald L Schnoor
Journal:  Environ Sci (Ruse)       Date:  2013

3.  Extracellular reduction of uranium via Geobacter conductive pili as a protective cellular mechanism.

Authors:  Dena L Cologgi; Sanela Lampa-Pastirk; Allison M Speers; Shelly D Kelly; Gemma Reguera
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A greenhouse and field-based study to determine the accumulation of arsenic in common homegrown vegetables grown in mining-affected soils.

Authors:  Monica D Ramirez-Andreotta; Mark L Brusseau; Janick F Artiola; Raina M Maier
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Bridging environmental mixtures and toxic effects.

Authors:  Sarah E Allan; Brian W Smith; Robert L Tanguay; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.742

6.  Detection of the Antimicrobial Triclosan in Environmental Samples by Immunoassay.

Authors:  Ki Chang Ahn; Anupama Ranganathan; Candace S Bever; Sung Hee Hwang; Erika B Holland; Kevin Morisseau; Isaac N Pessah; Bruce D Hammock; Shirley J Gee
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Phytotechnologies--preventing exposures, improving public health.

Authors:  Heather F Henry; Joel G Burken; Raina M Maier; Lee A Newman; Steven Rock; Jerald L Schnoor; William A Suk
Journal:  Int J Phytoremediation       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.212

8.  Inhalation and dietary exposure to PCBs in urban and rural cohorts via congener-specific measurements.

Authors:  Matt D Ampleman; Andrés Martinez; Jeanne DeWall; Dorothea F K Rawn; Keri C Hornbuckle; Peter S Thorne
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Enantioselective transport and biotransformation of chiral hydroxylated metabolites of polychlorinated biphenyls in whole poplar plants.

Authors:  Guangshu Zhai; Sarah M Gutowski; Hans-Joachim Lehmler; Jerald L Schnoor
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Use of isotope dilution method to predict bioavailability of organic pollutants in historically contaminated sediments.

Authors:  Fang Jia; Lian-Jun Bao; Jordan Crago; Daniel Schlenk; Jay Gan
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Hydrogels and Hydrogel Nanocomposites: Enhancing Healthcare through Human and Environmental Treatment.

Authors:  Angela M Gutierrez; Erin Molly Frazar; Maria Victoria X Klaus; Pranto Paul; J Zach Hilt
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 9.933

2.  Understanding exposures and latent disease risk within the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Superfund Research Program.

Authors:  Sara M Amolegbe; Danielle J Carlin; Heather F Henry; Michelle L Heacock; Brittany A Trottier; William A Suk
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2022-03-07

3.  Assessing the Economic and Societal Benefits of SRP-Funded Research.

Authors:  William A Suk; Michelle L Heacock; Brittany A Trottier; Sara M Amolegbe; Maureen D Avakian; Heather F Henry; Danielle J Carlin; Larry G Reed
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  How Government Size Expansion Can Affect Green Innovation-An Empirical Analysis of Data on Cross-Country Green Patent Filings.

Authors:  Jun Wen; Lingxiao Li; Xinxin Zhao; Chenyang Jiao; Wenjie Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.614

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.