Literature DB >> 28211961

An extended vascular model for less biased estimation of permeability parameters in DCE-T1 images.

Siamak P Nejad-Davarani1,2,3, Hassan Bagher-Ebadian1,4, James R Ewing3,4, Douglas C Noll2, Tom Mikkelsen5, Michael Chopp3,4, Quan Jiang3,4.   

Abstract

One of the key elements in dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) image analysis is the arterial input function (AIF). Traditionally, in DCE studies a global AIF sampled from a major artery or vein is used to estimate the vascular permeability parameters; however, not addressing dispersion and delay of the AIF at the tissue level can lead to biased estimates of these parameters. To find less biased estimates of vascular permeability parameters, a vascular model of the cerebral vascular system is proposed that considers effects of dispersion of the AIF in the vessel branches, as well as extravasation of the contrast agent (CA) to the extravascular-extracellular space. Profiles of the CA concentration were simulated for different branching levels of the vascular structure, combined with the effects of vascular leakage. To estimate the permeability parameters, the extended model was applied to these simulated signals and also to DCE-T1 (dynamic contrast enhanced T1 ) images of patients with glioblastoma multiforme tumors. The simulation study showed that, compared with the case of solving the pharmacokinetic equation with a global AIF, using the local AIF that is corrected by the vascular model can give less biased estimates of the permeability parameters (Ktrans , vp and Kb ). Applying the extended model to signals sampled from different areas of the DCE-T1 image showed that it is able to explain the CA concentration profile in both the normal areas and the tumor area, where effects of vascular leakage exist. Differences in the values of the permeability parameters estimated in these images using the local and global AIFs followed the same trend as the simulation study. These results demonstrate that the vascular model can be a useful tool for obtaining more accurate estimation of parameters in DCE studies.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DCE-MRI; arterial input function; cerebral tumors; dynamic contrast enhanced imaging; vascular modeling; vascular permeability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28211961      PMCID: PMC5489235          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  22 in total

1.  Delay and dispersion effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: simulations using singular value decomposition.

Authors:  F Calamante; D G Gadian; A Connelly
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging techniques: CT and MRI.

Authors:  J P B O'Connor; P S Tofts; K A Miles; L M Parkes; G Thompson; A Jackson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; Jeffrey J Luci; Martin Lepage; Rui Li; Laura Debusk; P Charles Lin; Ronald R Price; John C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Quantification of cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, and blood-brain-barrier leakage with DCE-MRI.

Authors:  Steven Sourbron; Michael Ingrisch; Axel Siefert; Maximilian Reiser; Karin Herrmann
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Computational fluid dynamics modelling of perfusion measurements in dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography: development, validation and clinical applications.

Authors:  M Peladeau-Pigeon; C Coolens
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  On the scope and interpretation of the Tofts models for DCE-MRI.

Authors:  Steven P Sourbron; David L Buckley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 7.  Model selection in measures of vascular parameters using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: experimental and clinical applications.

Authors:  James R Ewing; Hassan Bagher-Ebadian
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Model selection for DCE-T1 studies in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Hassan Bagher-Ebadian; Rajan Jain; Siamak P Nejad-Davarani; Tom Mikkelsen; Mei Lu; Quan Jiang; Lisa Scarpace; Ali S Arbab; Jayant Narang; Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh; Ramesh Paudyal; James R Ewing
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Digital reconstruction and morphometric analysis of human brain arterial vasculature from magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Susan N Wright; Peter Kochunov; Fernando Mut; Maurizio Bergamino; Kerry M Brown; John C Mazziotta; Arthur W Toga; Juan R Cebral; Giorgio A Ascoli
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols.

Authors:  P S Tofts; G Brix; D L Buckley; J L Evelhoch; E Henderson; M V Knopp; H B Larsson; T Y Lee; N A Mayr; G J Parker; R E Port; J Taylor; R M Weisskoff
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  2 in total

1.  Estimation of the capillary level input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast using a deep learning approach.

Authors:  Jonghyun Bae; Zhengnan Huang; Florian Knoll; Krzysztof Geras; Terlika Pandit Sood; Li Feng; Laura Heacock; Linda Moy; Sungheon Gene Kim
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  MRI and glymphatic system.

Authors:  Quan Jiang
Journal:  Stroke Vasc Neurol       Date:  2019-04-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.