Literature DB >> 28211952

Long-Term Experience with First-Generation Implantable Neurostimulation Device in Central Sleep Apnea Treatment.

Henrik Fox1, Thomas Bitter1, Dieter Horstkotte1, Olaf Oldenburg1, Klaus-Jürgen Gutleben1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) are associated with shorter survival in patients with heart failure. A novel treatment method for this patient group is unilateral phrenic nerve stimulation by the remedē® system (Respicardia Inc., Minnetonka, MN, USA), a transvenously implantable neurostimulation device, which has recently been studied in a large randomized, controlled trial. Previous literature has shown efficacy and safety of the treatment with this first-generation device, but hardly any data are available on long-term clinical parameters, the remedē® device's battery lifetime, device exchangeability, lead position stability, surgical accessibility, and manageability.
METHODS: We performed remedē® device replacements in consecutive patients for battery depletion, and documented clinical parameters, longevity, operation procedure, complications, and difficulties.
RESULTS: All patients were on neurostimulation treatment by phrenic nerve neurostimulation when device replacement became necessary. Apnea-hypopnea index (from 45 ± 4/h to 9 ± 4/h), oxygen-desaturation index (from 35 ± 7/h to 7 ± 6/h), and time spent with oxygen saturation of <90% (T < 90% from 5 ± 7% to 0 ± 0%) were improved and improvements remained constant throughout the 4-year follow-up. Mean battery life was 4.2 ± 0.2 years and mean replacement procedure time was 25 ± 5.1 minutes. Apart from conventional X-ray documentation of stable lead positions in a long-term setting, no radiation or contrast dye usage was needed and no major complications occurred. In addition, clinical exercise capacity and sleepiness symptoms improved.
CONCLUSIONS: Novel remedē® device shows sustained therapy efficacy and safety in terms of stable lead positions over 4 years. Long-term phrenic nerve neurostimulation therapy for central SDB/CSR appears feasible in a clinical routine setting.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cheyne-Stokes respiration; heart failure; phrenic nerve stimulation; polysomnography; sleep-disordered breathing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28211952     DOI: 10.1111/pace.13049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  5 in total

Review 1.  Management of Sleep Disordered Breathing in Patients with Heart Failure.

Authors:  Connor P Oates; Manjula Ananthram; Stephen S Gottlieb
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2018-06

2.  Characteristics and circadian distribution of cardiac arrhythmias in patients with heart failure and sleep-disordered breathing.

Authors:  Hazem Omran; Thomas Bitter; Dieter Horstkotte; Olaf Oldenburg; Henrik Fox
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Long-term efficacy and safety of phrenic nerve stimulation for the treatment of central sleep apnea.

Authors:  Henrik Fox; Olaf Oldenburg; Shahrokh Javaheri; Piotr Ponikowski; Ralph Augostini; Lee R Goldberg; Christoph Stellbrink; Scott Mckane; Timothy E Meyer; William T Abraham; Maria Rosa Costanzo
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 4.  Frequency and outcomes of primary central sleep apnea in a population-based study.

Authors:  Ioanna Kouri; Bhanu Prakash Kolla; Timothy I Morgenthaler; Meghna P Mansukhani
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 4.842

5.  Prognostic value of sleep apnea and nocturnal hypoxemia in patients with decompensated heart failure.

Authors:  Yuhui Huang; Yunhong Wang; Yan Huang; Mei Zhai; Qiong Zhou; Xuemei Zhao; Pengchao Tian; Shiming Ji; Chen Zhang; Yuhui Zhang; Jian Zhang
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.882

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.