Literature DB >> 28211834

Is Active Design changing the workplace? - A natural pre-post experiment looking at health behaviour and workplace perceptions.

Lina Engelen, Josephine Chau, Erika Bohn-Goldbaum, Sarah Young, Dominique Hespe, Adrian Bauman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Active Design is a relatively new concept and evaluation on its effects on healthy behaviour is lacking.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate Active Design influence on workplace physical activity, sedentary behaviour, musculoskeletal complaints, and perceptions of the workplace and productivity.
METHODS: Participants (n = 118 adults) moving from 14 workplaces into a new building completed an online questionnaire pre- and post-move. The questions related to health behaviours (physical activity, sitting time and sleep); musculoskeletal issues; perceptions of the office environment; productivity; and engagement.
RESULTS: After the move, 68% of participants were located in an open plan building (21% before the move). In the new workplace participants tended to sit less during their work time (72% - 66%; p < 0.05) and stand more (15% - 19%; p < 0.05) while walking remained unchanged. Participants reported less lower-back pain. The new work environment was perceived as more motivating and providing better light, air quality and temperature, but less storage space. Participants reported looking forward to going to work more than before. No difference was reported in productivity related measures.
CONCLUSIONS: Moving to a new Active Design building can have some physical health-promoting effects on occupants. Satisfaction with environmental characteristics tended to improve in the new building though perceptions of productivity measures were variable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Workplace health; indoor environment; sedentary behaviour; survey

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28211834     DOI: 10.3233/WOR-172483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Work        ISSN: 1051-9815


  7 in total

1.  Workplace Interventions to Promote Sleep Health and an Alert, Healthy Workforce.

Authors:  Nancy S Redeker; Claire C Caruso; Sarah D Hashmi; Janet M Mullington; Michael Grandner; Timothy I Morgenthaler
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 4.062

2.  Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.

Authors:  Nipun Shrestha; Katriina T Kukkonen-Harjula; Jos H Verbeek; Sharea Ijaz; Veerle Hermans; Zeljko Pedisic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-17

Review 3.  Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.

Authors:  Nipun Shrestha; Katriina T Kukkonen-Harjula; Jos H Verbeek; Sharea Ijaz; Veerle Hermans; Zeljko Pedisic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-06-20

4.  Moving to an "Active" Biophilic Designed Office Workplace: A Pilot Study about the Effects on Sitting Time and Sitting Habits of Office-Based Workers.

Authors:  Birgit Wallmann-Sperlich; Sophie Hoffmann; Anne Salditt; Tanja Bipp; Ingo Froboese
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Does Active Design Influence Activity, Sitting, Wellbeing and Productivity in the Workplace? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lina Engelen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Measuring "Nudgeability": Development of a Scale on Susceptibility to Physical Activity Nudges among College Students.

Authors:  Xinghua Wang; Guandong Song; Xia Wan
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-01

7.  Flexible work arrangements in open workspaces and relations to occupational stress, need for recovery and psychological detachment from work.

Authors:  Stefanie Mache; Ricarda Servaty; Volker Harth
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 2.646

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.