| Literature DB >> 28211495 |
Kaili Wen1, Aijuan Zhou1,2, Jiaguang Zhang3, Zhihong Liu1, Guoying Wang1, Wenzong Liu4, Aijie Wang4,5, Xiuping Yue1.
Abstract
Most studies on the production of volatile fatty acids (VFAs) from waste activated sludge (WAS) digestion have focused on operating conditions, pretreatments and characteristic adjustments. Conditioning by extra carbon sources (ECS), normally added in a solid form, has been reported to be an efficient approach. However, this has caused considerable waste of monomeric sugars in the hydrolysate. In this study, the effects of two added forms (pretreated straw (S) and hydrolyzed liquid (L)) of cornstover (CS) on WAS acidification were investigated. To obtain different cellulosic compositions of CS, low-thermal or autoclaved assisted alkaline (TA or AA) pretreatments were conducted. The results showed that AA-L test achieved the highest VFAs value (653 mg COD/g VSS), followed by AA-S (613 mg COD/g VSS). These values were 12% and 28% higher, respectively, than that obtained in the TA-L and TA-S tests. Meanwhile, higher percentages of acetic acid were observed after AA pretreatment (~62% versus ~53% in TA). The added forms of CS played an important role in structuring the innate microbial community in the WAS, as shown by high-throughput sequencing and canonical correspondence analysis. The findings obtained in this work may provide a scientific basis for the potential implementation of co-digesting WAS with ECS simultaneously obtaining energy and high value-added products.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28211495 PMCID: PMC5314333 DOI: 10.1038/srep42887
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
The main characteristics of the substrates.
| Parameter | Concentrated WASa,b | Pretreated WASa,b | Autoclaved-alkaline | Thermal-alkaline | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liquid | Straw | Liquid | Straw | |||
| pH | 6.68~6.90 | 6.62~6.76 | 6.62~6.76 | 6.62~6.76 | 9.39~9.51 | 7.71~7.88 |
| TSS | 24390 ± 1320 | 22930 ± 820 | 24510 ± 468 | 27880 ± 727 | 23040 ± 794 | 29690 ± 482 |
| VSS | 16160 ± 980 | 15260 ± 1140 | 14540 ± 577 | 12343 ± 372 | 14290 ± 760 | 19930 ± 985 |
| SCOD | 232 ± 27 | 4290 ± 192 | 13371 ± 811 | 7785 ± 838 | 7362 ± 1012 | 6897 ± 996 |
| TCOD | 25420 ± 641 | 26930 ± 314 | 19660 ± 1463 | 20843 ± 1672 | 28460 ± 1455 | 31580 ± 4198 |
| VFAs (as COD) | 69 ± 6 | 805 ± 17 | 2552 ± 997 | 1524 ± 572 | 596 ± 112 | 989 ± 37 |
| Soluble carbohydrates (as COD) | 89 ± 7.6 | 412 ± 22 | 1631 ± 82 | 603 ± 116 | 1499 ± 112 | 1012 ± 79 |
| Soluble proteins (as COD) | 110 ± 17.2 | 3130 ± 419 | 6950 ± 601 | 3675 ± 374 | 10930 ± 869 | 11525 ± 599 |
aAll values are expressed in mg/L except pH.
bThe error bars represent the standard deviation.
Characteristics of raw and pretreated CSs.
| Raw CS | AA-pretreated CS | TA-pretreated CS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Straw (Residue) | Cellulose (%) | 37.1 ± 1.2 | 47.7 ± 0.8 | 39.8 ± 1.1 |
| Hemicellulose (%) | 28.4 ± 0.8 | 16.8 ± 1.2 | 15.7 ± 1.1 | |
| Lignin (%) | 18.5 ± 1.3 | 5.7 ± 0.7 | 9.8 ± 0.9 | |
| Liquid (Hydrolysate) | Glucose (g/L) | — | 1.9 ± 0.3 | 2.8 ± 0.3 |
| Xylose (g/L) | — | 4.9 ± 0.7 | 5.5 ± 0.6 | |
| Arabinose (g/L) | — | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.2 |
Figure 1Effect of CS addition forms and pretreatment methods on VFAs concentration (A), yield (B) and composition (C) from WAS co-digestion (Note: the error bars represent the standard deviation).
Figure 2Time-course profiles of soluble carbohydrates (A) and soluble proteins (B) (Note: the error bars represent the standard deviation).
Figure 3Overlap of the five bacterial communities based on OTU (3% distance) (A). The shared OTUs were analyzed at phylum level (B). Rarefaction curves (C) and principal component analysis (D) of bacterial communities from WAS and WAS-CS based on pyrosequencing of 16 S rRNA gene. Hierarchical cluster analysis (E).
Figure 4Taxonomic classification of pyrosequences from bacterial communities of five samples at the phyla (A), class (B) and genus (C) levels.
Figure 5Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) between enriched genera and environmental variables (VFAs, methane, pH, soluble proteins and carbohydrtaes).
Figure 6Schematic diagram of an enhanced concept applied in a WWTP with the WAS digestion conditioning with different CS addition forms.