Literature DB >> 28211303

Proposal of new classification of femoral trochanteric fracture by three-dimensional computed tomography and relationship to usual plain X-ray classification.

Etsuo Shoda1, Shimpei Kitada1, Yu Sasaki1, Hitoshi Hirase1, Takahiro Niikura2, Sang Yang Lee2, Atsushi Sakurai3, Keisuke Oe3, Takeharu Sasaki4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Classification of femoral trochanteric fractures is usually based on plain X-ray findings using the Evans, Jensen, or AO/OTA classification. However, complications such as nonunion and cut out of the lag screw or blade are seen even in stable fracture. This may be due to the difficulty of exact diagnosis of fracture pattern in plain X-ray. Computed tomography (CT) may provide more information about the fracture pattern, but such data are scarce. In the present study, it was performed to propose a classification system for femoral trochanteric fractures using three-dimensional CT (3D-CT) and investigate the relationship between this classification and conventional plain X-ray classification.
METHODS: Using three-dimensional (3D)-CT, fractures were classified as two, three, or four parts using combinations of the head, greater trochanter, lesser trochanter, and shaft. We identified five subgroups of three-part fractures according to the fracture pattern involving the greater and lesser trochanters. In total, 239 femoral trochanteric fractures (45 men, 194 women; average age, 84.4 years) treated in four hospitals were classified using our 3D-CT classification. The relationship between this 3D-CT classification and the AO/OTA, Evans, and Jensen X-ray classifications was investigated.
RESULTS: In the 3D-CT classification, many fractures exhibited a large oblique fragment of the greater trochanter including the lesser trochanter. This fracture type was recognized as unstable in the 3D-CT classification but was often classified as stable in each X-ray classification.
CONCLUSIONS: It is difficult to evaluate fracture patterns involving the greater trochanter, especially large oblique fragments including the lesser trochanter, using plain X-rays. The 3D-CT shows the fracture line very clearly, making it easy to classify the fracture pattern.

Entities:  

Keywords:  X-ray; classification; computed tomography (CT); femoral trochanteric fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28211303     DOI: 10.1177/2309499017692700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)        ISSN: 1022-5536            Impact factor:   1.118


  13 in total

1.  A comprehensive 3D CT based classification of intertrochanteric fracture.

Authors:  R B Kalia; Shobha S Arora; Bhaskar Sarkar; Souvik Paul; Sukhmin Singh
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-05-31

2.  Posterior Sagging After Cephalomedullary Nailing for Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture is Associated with a Separation of the Greater Trochanter.

Authors:  Keong-Hwan Kim; Michael Seungcheol Kang; Eic Ju Lim; Mi Lan Park; Jung Jae Kim
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2020-08-04

3.  Conventional computed tomography software can be used for accurate pre-operative templating in bipolar hip arthroplasty: A preliminary report.

Authors:  Nobuaki Chinzei; Mitsuaki Noda; Hiroshi Nashiki; Takehiko Matsushita; Atsuyuki Inui; Shinya Hayashi
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-09-06

4.  Three-dimensional mapping of intertrochanteric fracture lines.

Authors:  Ming Li; Zhi-Rui Li; Jian-Tao Li; Ming-Xing Lei; Xiu-Yun Su; Guo-Qi Wang; Hao Zhang; Gao-Xiang Xu; Peng Yin; Li-Cheng Zhang; Pei-Fu Tang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Gamma 3 U-Blade lag screws in patients with trochanteric femur fractures: are rotation control lag screws better than others?

Authors:  Jehyun Yoo; Sangmin Kim; Junyoung Choi; Jihyo Hwang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Hip fracture care and national systems: Australia and Asia.

Authors:  Seth M Tarrrant; Amit Ajgaonkar; Sushrut Babhulkar; Zhiyong Cui; Ian A Harris; Sunil Kulkarni; Hiroaki Minehara; Takashi Miyamoto; Andrew Oppy; Kenji Shigemoto; Yun Tian; Zsolt J Balogh
Journal:  OTA Int       Date:  2020-03-23

7.  Low psoas major muscle area as a risk factor for contralateral hip fracture following intertrochanteric fracture.

Authors:  Takehiro Kawakami; Takashi Imagama; Tomotoshi Murakami; Takehiro Kaneoka; Manabu Yamamoto
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.041

8.  The Efficacy of Suture Fixation of the Greater Trochanter in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures.

Authors:  Ki-Choul Kim; Hee-Gon Park; Jae-Wook Park
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-07-28

9.  Reverse wedge effect following intramedullary nailing of a basicervical trochanteric fracture variant combined with a mechanically compromised greater trochanter.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Jun Hu; Xiang Li; Xiaodong Qin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  The Role of Preoperative Computed Tomography on the Quality of Reduction and Outcomes in Intertrochanteric Fracture: A Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Tao Ma; Lin-Jie Hao; Peng-Fei Wen; Ya-Kang Wang; Hu Wang; Bin-Fei Zhang; Yu-Min Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.