Literature DB >> 28211153

The prognostic relevance of serum lactate dehydrogenase and mild bone marrow reticulin fibrosis in essential thrombocythemia.

Mythri Mudireddy1, Daniela Barraco1, Curtis A Hanson2, Animesh Pardanani1, Naseema Gangat1, Ayalew Tefferi1.   

Abstract

The 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria for myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) underscore the prognostically-relevant distinction between essential thrombocythemia (ET) and prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (pre-PMF). In addition, leukocytosis has been identified as an important prognostic marker in otherwise WHO-defined ET. However, controversy remains regarding the objectivity of morphologic criteria in distinguishing ET from pre-PMF and the precise prognostic cutoff values for leukocytosis. Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level might be a biologically more accurate measure of leukocyte turnover and a more sensitive marker of pre-PMF, in otherwise WHO-defined ET. In the current study of 183 consecutive patients with WHO-defined ET, the presence of grade 1 bone marrow (BM) fibrosis did not affect presenting clinical or laboratory features; in contrast, increased serum LDH at diagnosis was associated with leukocytosis (p = .002), thrombocytosis (p < .001), palpable splenomegaly (p = .03) and higher international prognostic score (IPSET) (p = .002); serum LDH did not correlate with BM fibrosis, JAK2/CALR/MPL or TET2/ASXL1 mutations. In univariate analysis, risk factors for survival included age ≥60 years (p = .002; HR 10.2, 95% CI 2.3-44.6), male sex (p = .02; HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.2-8.2), leukocyte count ≥15 × 109 /L (p = .007; HR 4.7, 95% CI 1.5-14.6), and increased serum LDH (p = .002; HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.5-9.1), but not BM fibrosis (p = .17). In multivariable analysis, age, sex and serum LDH remained significant; serum LDH also remained significant, in the context of IPSET (p = .003) and in patients with leukocytosis (p = .003). We conclude that serum LDH level carries an independent prognostic value for survival in ET and might represent a biologically more accurate surrogate for leukocytosis.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28211153     DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  6 in total

1.  Leukocytosis and thrombosis in essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alessandra Carobbio; Alberto Ferrari; Arianna Masciulli; Arianna Ghirardi; Giovanni Barosi; Tiziano Barbui
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-06-11

Review 2.  SOHO State-of-the-Art Update and Next Questions: MPN.

Authors:  Prithviraj Bose; Jason Gotlib; Claire N Harrison; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2018-01

3.  Clonogenic assays improve determination of variant allele frequency of driver mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Steffen Koschmieder; Nicolas Chatain; Milena Kalmer; Kristina Pannen; Rebecca Lemanzyk; Chiara Wirths; Julian Baumeister; Angela Maurer; Kim Kricheldorf; Joelle Schifflers; Deniz Gezer; Susanne Isfort; Tim H Brümmendorf
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 4.  Essential thrombocythemia treatment algorithm 2018.

Authors:  Ayalew Tefferi; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Tiziano Barbui
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 11.037

5.  Marked elevation of serum lactate dehydrogenase in primary myelofibrosis: clinical and prognostic correlates.

Authors:  Sahrish Shah; Mythri Mudireddy; Curtis A Hanson; Rhett P Ketterling; Naseema Gangat; Animesh Pardanani; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 11.037

6.  Is It Possible to Predict Clonal Thrombocytosis in Triple-Negative Patients with Isolated Thrombocytosis Based Only on Clinical or Blood Findings?

Authors:  Tanja Belčič Mikič; Bor Vratanar; Tadej Pajič; Saša Anžej Doma; Nataša Debeljak; Irena Preložnik Zupan; Matjaž Sever; Samo Zver
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.