Literature DB >> 28211141

Potential relocation of climatic environments suggests high rates of climate displacement within the North American protection network.

Enric Batllori1,2, Marc-André Parisien3, Sean A Parks4, Max A Moritz5, Carol Miller4.   

Abstract

Ongoing climate change may undermine the effectiveness of protected area networks in preserving the set of biotic components and ecological processes they harbor, thereby jeopardizing their conservation capacity into the future. Metrics of climate change, particularly rates and spatial patterns of climatic alteration, can help assess potential threats. Here, we perform a continent-wide climate change vulnerability assessment whereby we compare the baseline climate of the protected area network in North America (Canada, United States, México-NAM) to the projected end-of-century climate (2071-2100). We estimated the projected pace at which climatic conditions may redistribute across NAM (i.e., climate velocity), and identified future nearest climate analogs to quantify patterns of climate relocation within, among, and outside protected areas. Also, we interpret climatic relocation patterns in terms of associated land-cover types. Our analysis suggests that the conservation capacity of the NAM protection network is likely to be severely compromised by a changing climate. The majority of protected areas (~80%) might be exposed to high rates of climate displacement that could promote important shifts in species abundance or distribution. A small fraction of protected areas (<10%) could be critical for future conservation plans, as they will host climates that represent analogs of conditions currently characterizing almost a fifth of the protected areas across NAM. However, the majority of nearest climatic analogs for protected areas are in nonprotected locations. Therefore, unprotected landscapes could pose additional threats, beyond climate forcing itself, as sensitive biota may have to migrate farther than what is prescribed by the climate velocity to reach a protected area destination. To mitigate future threats to the conservation capacity of the NAM protected area network, conservation plans will need to capitalize on opportunities provided by the existing availability of natural land-cover types outside the current network of NAM protected areas. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  climate analogs; climate relocation; climate velocity; conservation; exposure assessment; global change; land-cover types; protection network

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28211141     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  7 in total

1.  Terrestrial biodiversity threatened by increasing global aridity velocity under high-level warming.

Authors:  Hao Shi; Hanqin Tian; Stefan Lange; Jia Yang; Shufen Pan; Bojie Fu; Christopher P O Reyer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Breeding range shift of the red-crowned crane (Grus japonensis) under climate change.

Authors:  Liwei Liu; Jishan Liao; Yongbo Wu; Yinlong Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Predicted climate shifts within terrestrial protected areas worldwide.

Authors:  Samuel Hoffmann; Severin D H Irl; Carl Beierkuhnlein
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Fine-grained climate velocities reveal vulnerability of protected areas to climate change.

Authors:  Risto K Heikkinen; Niko Leikola; Juha Aalto; Kaisu Aapala; Saija Kuusela; Miska Luoto; Raimo Virkkala
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Northern protected areas will become important refuges for biodiversity tracking suitable climates.

Authors:  Dominique Berteaux; Marylène Ricard; Martin-Hugues St-Laurent; Nicolas Casajus; Catherine Périé; Frieda Beauregard; Sylvie de Blois
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Keeping pace with climate change in global terrestrial protected areas.

Authors:  Paul R Elsen; William B Monahan; Eric R Dougherty; Adina M Merenlender
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 14.957

7.  Projected changes in bird assemblages due to climate change in a Canadian system of protected areas.

Authors:  Marcel A Gahbauer; Scott R Parker; Joanna X Wu; Cavan Harpur; Brooke L Bateman; Darroch M Whitaker; Douglas P Tate; Lotem Taylor; Denis Lepage
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.