Pankaj Garg1,2. 1. Colorectal Surgery Division, Indus Super Specialty Hospital, Mohali, Punjab, India. drgargpankaj@yahoo.com. 2. Garg Fistula Research Institute, 1042, Sector-15, Panchkula, Haryana, 134113, India. drgargpankaj@yahoo.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Histopathology is commonly used to diagnose tuberculosis in fistula-in-ano. The aim was to compare the sensitivity of polymerase chain reaction and histopathology in detecting tuberculosis in fistula-in-ano. METHODS: The histopathology and polymerase chain-reaction of tissue (fistula tract) was done in all the consecutive operated cases. When pus sample was also available, polymerase chain reaction-pus was also done RESULTS: Three hundred forty seven samples (179 patients) were tested over 2 years (median 6.5 months). The mean age was 38.8 ± 10.7 years, and male/female was 170/9. Histopathology and polymerase chain reaction of tissue (fistula tract) was done in 152 and 165 patients, respectively. Polymerase chain reaction (pus) could be done in 30 patients. Overall, tuberculosis was detected in 20/179 (11.2%) patients. Of these, tuberculosis was detected by histopathology (tissue) in 1/152 (0.7%) and by polymerase chain reaction (tissue) in 14/165 (8.5%) patients. In pus, polymerase chain reaction detected tuberculosis in 6/30 (20%) patients. Both polymerase chain reaction of tissue and pus were positive in one patient. Polymerase chain reaction (tissue) and polymerase chain reaction (pus) were significantly more sensitive than histopathology (tissue) for detecting tuberculosis [histopathology 1/152 vs. polymerase chain reaction (tissue) 14/165, p = 0.0009] [histopathology 1/152 vs. polymerase chain reaction (pus) 6/30, p < 0.0001]. In 20 patients detected to have tuberculosis, four drug anti-tubercular therapy was recommended for 6 months. The therapy was completed in 13 patients and 12/13 (92.3%) were cured. The therapy is continuing in 3/20 patients. Four patients did not take the therapy. None of them was cured. CONCLUSIONS: Polymerase chain reaction was significantly more sensitive than histopathology in detecting tuberculosis in fistula-in-ano. Histopathology might be missing out tuberculosis in many patients leading to recurrence of the fistula.
PURPOSE: Histopathology is commonly used to diagnose tuberculosis in fistula-in-ano. The aim was to compare the sensitivity of polymerase chain reaction and histopathology in detecting tuberculosis in fistula-in-ano. METHODS: The histopathology and polymerase chain-reaction of tissue (fistula tract) was done in all the consecutive operated cases. When pus sample was also available, polymerase chain reaction-pus was also done RESULTS: Three hundred forty seven samples (179 patients) were tested over 2 years (median 6.5 months). The mean age was 38.8 ± 10.7 years, and male/female was 170/9. Histopathology and polymerase chain reaction of tissue (fistula tract) was done in 152 and 165 patients, respectively. Polymerase chain reaction (pus) could be done in 30 patients. Overall, tuberculosis was detected in 20/179 (11.2%) patients. Of these, tuberculosis was detected by histopathology (tissue) in 1/152 (0.7%) and by polymerase chain reaction (tissue) in 14/165 (8.5%) patients. In pus, polymerase chain reaction detected tuberculosis in 6/30 (20%) patients. Both polymerase chain reaction of tissue and pus were positive in one patient. Polymerase chain reaction (tissue) and polymerase chain reaction (pus) were significantly more sensitive than histopathology (tissue) for detecting tuberculosis [histopathology 1/152 vs. polymerase chain reaction (tissue) 14/165, p = 0.0009] [histopathology 1/152 vs. polymerase chain reaction (pus) 6/30, p < 0.0001]. In 20 patients detected to have tuberculosis, four drug anti-tubercular therapy was recommended for 6 months. The therapy was completed in 13 patients and 12/13 (92.3%) were cured. The therapy is continuing in 3/20 patients. Four patients did not take the therapy. None of them was cured. CONCLUSIONS: Polymerase chain reaction was significantly more sensitive than histopathology in detecting tuberculosis in fistula-in-ano. Histopathology might be missing out tuberculosis in many patients leading to recurrence of the fistula.
Authors: J L Alvarez Conde; V M Gutiérrez Alonso; J Del Riego Tomás; I García Martínez; A Arizcun Sánchez-Morate; C Vaquero Puerta Journal: Rev Esp Enferm Dig Date: 1992-01 Impact factor: 2.086
Authors: Nabin K Shrestha; Marion J Tuohy; Gerri S Hall; Udo Reischl; Steven M Gordon; Gary W Procop Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 5.948