Literature DB >> 28210695

Circulating Tumor DNA Testing for Liver Cancer.

Larissa V Furtado1, Jeremy P Segal1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 28210695      PMCID: PMC5301406          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2015.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 2352-345X


× No keyword cloud information.
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis represents a potential paradigm shift in personalized medicine. Unlike tissue biopsy, it constitutes a minimally invasive approach that allows for diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic marker detection, early and serial assessment of metastatic disease, therapy monitoring, and determination of clonal evolution. Because ctDNA reflects genetic and epigenetic alterations from primary cancers, it may be used for the surrogate analysis of cancer genomes via liquid biopsy, especially in those tumors for which biopsy specimens are difficult to obtain or unobtainable. Several studies have supported the potential utility of ctDNA as cancer biomarkers. Both the levels of ctDNA in the plasma or serum of cancer patients and cancer-specific genetic and epigenetic changes have been detected in ctDNA and have demonstrated potential diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive value. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide.2, 3 Currently, diagnosis is based on imaging techniques and/or biopsy. Because the disease is frequently diagnosed at late stages, prognosis is poor for HCC patients, with a 5-year survival rate of only approximately 11%. With the advent of large-scale genomic technologies, the complex mutation landscape of HCC has been largely defined5, 6 and has helped improve the treatment options for HCC patients. For instance, the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib has been shown to increase survival in patients with advanced HCC.7, 8 HRAS/NRAS mutation analysis of ctDNA has been applied in a phase 2 clinical trial to assess response to a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibition. Until now, however, a comprehensive characterization of ctDNA on HCC patients has not been conducted. To evaluate the usefulness of ctDNA for the characterization of genomic alterations in HCCs, Ono et al performed whole-genome sequencing on 46 HCC samples and matched normal lymphocytes from patients who underwent hepatectomy or liver transplantation and for whom preoperative and postoperative serial serum samples were available. Somatic alterations were detected in all 46 samples. For each tumor, the authors selected three somatic rearrangements and designed primers spanning their breakpoints for serum ctDNA polymerase chain reaction testing. They detected ctDNA in the preoperative serum of 7 of the 46 patients. In these patients, serum ctDNA positivity correlated with larger tumor size and higher ɑ-fetoprotein (AFP) and des-γ-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) levels. The cumulative incidence of recurrence and extrahepatic metastasis within 2 years after hepatectomy were also found to be remarkably worse in ctDNA-positive patients than in the ctDNA-negative group. Further, ctDNA was found to be an independent predictor of microscopic vascular invasion of the portal vein, although no statistically significant difference in the cumulative survival rate was observed between ctDNA-positive and ctDNA-negative patients. Ono et al also quantified ctDNA by real-time polymerase chain reaction in serially sampled serum before and after surgery from ctDNA-positive patients and demonstrated that the serum ctDNA levels were increased with disease progression and reflected the response to treatments. Cell-free DNA was increased after a transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) procedure, with the highest level being detected 4 days after the procedure. In addition, the authors performed exome sequencing on the primary tumor, and they paired plasma ctDNA in one patient with HCC/cholangiocarcinoma and found that 83% of mutations detected in the primary tumor could also be identified in the plasma ctDNA. The remaining discrepancy is likely explained by the low sequencing depth, which provides insufficient sensitivity for the detection of low-frequency variants or tumor heterogeneity. These data have important implications. First, it is apparent that ctDNA levels reflect the cancer progression and therapy effects on HCC and that the TACE procedure is capable of enriching ctDNA in cell-free DNA in blood. Second, these data demonstrate the potential utility of ctDNA as a biomarker for individualized management of hepatocellular carcinoma. With further validation, the determination of HCC genome profiles through ctDNA analysis may help guide individualized therapy selection and monitoring without requiring percutaneous biopsies.
  8 in total

1.  Trans-ancestry mutational landscape of hepatocellular carcinoma genomes.

Authors:  Yasushi Totoki; Kenji Tatsuno; Kyle R Covington; Hiroki Ueda; Chad J Creighton; Mamoru Kato; Shingo Tsuji; Lawrence A Donehower; Betty L Slagle; Hiromi Nakamura; Shogo Yamamoto; Eve Shinbrot; Natsuko Hama; Megan Lehmkuhl; Fumie Hosoda; Yasuhito Arai; Kim Walker; Mahmoud Dahdouli; Kengo Gotoh; Genta Nagae; Marie-Claude Gingras; Donna M Muzny; Hidenori Ojima; Kazuaki Shimada; Yutaka Midorikawa; John A Goss; Ronald Cotton; Akimasa Hayashi; Junji Shibahara; Shumpei Ishikawa; Jacfranz Guiteau; Mariko Tanaka; Tomoko Urushidate; Shoko Ohashi; Naoko Okada; Harsha Doddapaneni; Min Wang; Yiming Zhu; Huyen Dinh; Takuji Okusaka; Norihiro Kokudo; Tomoo Kosuge; Tadatoshi Takayama; Masashi Fukayama; Richard A Gibbs; David A Wheeler; Hiroyuki Aburatani; Tatsuhiro Shibata
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 2.  Do circulating tumor cells, exosomes, and circulating tumor nucleic acids have clinical utility? A report of the association for molecular pathology.

Authors:  Bert Gold; Milena Cankovic; Larissa V Furtado; Frederick Meier; Christopher D Gocke
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  A phase II study of the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy of the MEK inhibitor refametinib (BAY 86-9766) plus sorafenib for Asian patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Ho Yeong Lim; Jeong Heo; Hye Jin Choi; Cheng-Yao Lin; Jung-Hwan Yoon; Chiun Hsu; Kun-Ming Rau; Ronnie T P Poon; Winnie Yeo; Joong-Won Park; Miah Hiang Tay; Wen-Son Hsieh; Christian Kappeler; Prabhu Rajagopalan; Heiko Krissel; Michael Jeffers; Chia-Jui Yen; Won Young Tak
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Global cancer statistics.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray; Melissa M Center; Jacques Ferlay; Elizabeth Ward; David Forman
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 5.  Hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Alejandro Forner; Josep M Llovet; Jordi Bruix
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Ann-Lii Cheng; Yoon-Koo Kang; Zhendong Chen; Chao-Jung Tsao; Shukui Qin; Jun Suk Kim; Rongcheng Luo; Jifeng Feng; Shenglong Ye; Tsai-Sheng Yang; Jianming Xu; Yan Sun; Houjie Liang; Jiwei Liu; Jiejun Wang; Won Young Tak; Hongming Pan; Karin Burock; Jessie Zou; Dimitris Voliotis; Zhongzhen Guan
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Genomic landscape of copy number aberrations enables the identification of oncogenic drivers in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Ho Yeong Lim; Stephanie Shi; Jeeyun Lee; Shibing Deng; Tao Xie; Zhou Zhu; Yuli Wang; David Pocalyko; Wei Jennifer Yang; Paul A Rejto; Mao Mao; Cheol-Keun Park; Jiangchun Xu
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 17.425

8.  Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Josep M Llovet; Sergio Ricci; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Philip Hilgard; Edward Gane; Jean-Frédéric Blanc; Andre Cosme de Oliveira; Armando Santoro; Jean-Luc Raoul; Alejandro Forner; Myron Schwartz; Camillo Porta; Stefan Zeuzem; Luigi Bolondi; Tim F Greten; Peter R Galle; Jean-François Seitz; Ivan Borbath; Dieter Häussinger; Tom Giannaris; Minghua Shan; Marius Moscovici; Dimitris Voliotis; Jordi Bruix
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 91.245

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Circulating tumor DNA as a potential prognostic and predictive biomarker during interventional therapy of unresectable primary liver cancer.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Lige Qiu; Huajiang Liu; Ying Xu; Meixiao Zhan; Wei Zhang; Yongjie Xin; Xu He; Xiangyu Yang; Jing Bai; Jing Xiao; Yanfang Guan; Qiyang Li; Lianpeng Chang; Xin Yi; Yong Li; Xudong Chen; Ligong Lu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-10

2.  Plasma Cell-Free DNA as a Predictive Marker after Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Sangjoon Park; Eun Jung Lee; Chai Hong Rim; Jinsil Seong
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.759

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.