Literature DB >> 28210555

Breast reconstruction with absorbable mesh sling: dynamic infrared thermography of skin envelope.

Yoko Hashimoto1, Naoki Watanabe1, Takeshi Yuasa1, Yoshinori Suzuki2, Hiroshi Saisho2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To immediate reconstruct ptosis breasts, we used polyglactin (Vicryl; Ethicon Inc., Somerville, NJ, USA) mesh as an inferolateral sling. However, Vicryl mesh is absorbable and losing function as a supporting structure. We doubt about the stability of the blood supply to the inferior part of the flap when it is in direct contact with inner implant. In this study, we examine the complications and the safety of the skin flap of this absorbable mesh sling (AMS) procedure.
METHODS: The outcomes of 80 cases were examined, and the 1-year safety record of 40 cases was assessed. Complications were divided into minor complications, major complications requiring surgical intervention, and major complications requiring the reconstructive surgery to be halted. In addition, we examined the blood perfusion of the skin flap by dynamic infrared thermography (DIRT).
RESULTS: Among 80 patients with AMS procedure, 73 breasts were reconstructed immediately and in one-stage. Complication outcomes are presented; there were 4 cases of minor flap necrosis (5%) and 4 of major complications resulting in surgical correction (5%). One patient required additional surgery, and the implant was moved into the musculocutaneous flap (1.3%). In 40 patients 1 year after surgery, DIRT showed significant decreased of blood perfusion in the ipsilateral inferior sites in comparison with the superior sites.
CONCLUSIONS: Blood perfusion was comparably insufficient in the inferior area of the reconstructed breast mound with AMS, where the pectoralis muscle could not be used to line the inside of the envelope. However, there were no severe flap complications due to ischemia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast reconstruction; Vicryl mesh; dynamic infrared thermography (DIRT); implant reconstruction; one-stage

Year:  2017        PMID: 28210555      PMCID: PMC5293645          DOI: 10.21037/gs.2016.12.01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  15 in total

1.  Dynamic thermographic imaging method for quantifying dermal perfusion: potential and limitations.

Authors:  S B Wilson; V A Spence
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Outcomes of tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction in the setting of prereconstruction radiation.

Authors:  Elliot M Hirsch; Akhil K Seth; Gregory A Dumanian; John Y S Kim; Thomas A Mustoe; Robert D Galiano; Neil A Fine
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Nonexpansive immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular tissue matrix graft (AlloDerm).

Authors:  C Andrew Salzberg
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.539

Review 4.  Radiation therapy and breast reconstruction: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Steven J Kronowitz; Geoffrey L Robb
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Beyond biologics: absorbable mesh as a low-cost, low-complication sling for implant-based breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Oren Tessler; Richard G Reish; Daniel Y Maman; Barbara L Smith; William G Austen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  What Is the Optimum Timing of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in Two-Stage Prosthetic Reconstruction: Radiation to the Tissue Expander or Permanent Implant?

Authors:  Peter G Cordeiro; Claudia R Albornoz; Beryl McCormick; Clifford A Hudis; Qunying Hu; Alexandra Heerdt; Evan Matros
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Thermographic mapping of perforators and skin blood flow in the free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap.

Authors:  A M Salmi; E Tukiainen; S Asko-Seljavaara
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.539

8.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem?

Authors:  Virgilio Sacchini; José A Pinotti; Alfredo C S D Barros; Alberto Luini; Alfonso Pluchinotta; Marianne Pinotti; Marcelo G Boratto; Marco D Ricci; Carlos A Ruiz; Antonio C Nisida; Paolo Veronesi; Jean Petit; Paolo Arnone; Fabio Bassi; Joseph J Disa; Carlos A Garcia-Etienne; Patrick I Borgen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction.

Authors:  S L Spear; P M Parikh; E Reisin; N G Menon
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.326

10.  Human Acellular Dermis versus Submuscular Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Multivariate Analysis of Short-Term Complications.

Authors:  Armando A Davila; Akhil K Seth; Edward Wang; Philip Hanwright; Karl Bilimoria; Neil Fine; John Ys Kim
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2013-01-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.