Literature DB >> 2821051

Evaluation of the usefulness of the cross-check dietary history method in longitudinal studies.

E C van Beresteyn1, M A van 't Hof, H J van der Heiden-Winkeldermaat, A ten Have-Witjes, R Neeter.   

Abstract

The data quality control of the first 4 years of an ongoing study (10 years duration) in a few hundred women and an additional control group is presented with regard to the measurements of the usual nutrient intake, covering a 1 year period, by means of the cross-check dietary history method. The results show that with regard to the disturbing time factors the cross-check dietary history method is (a) reasonably reproducible for most nutrients except vitamin A and vitamin C, (b) does not show test effects when interviews were taken only once a year, (c) does show observer effects. The method has a reasonable validity. It is concluded that, on an individual basis, the nutrient variables are not appropriate for a detailed calculation of changes per unit time but are useful as a general measure for the development of the individual (e.g. the average change per time unit over a longer period). For this reason the method can be reliably used in longitudinal studies to evaluate the role of diet in relation to chronic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2821051     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90119-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chronic Dis        ISSN: 0021-9681


  2 in total

1.  Habitual dietary calcium intake and cortical bone loss in perimenopausal women: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  E C van Beresteijn; M A van 't Hof; G Schaafsma; H de Waard; S A Duursma
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Validity and reproducibility of a Spanish dietary history.

Authors:  Pilar Guallar-Castillón; Jon Sagardui-Villamor; Teresa Balboa-Castillo; Aleix Sala-Vila; Maria José Ariza Astolfi; Maria Dolores Sarrión Pelous; Luz María León-Muñoz; Auxiliadora Graciani; Martín Laclaustra; Cristina Benito; José Ramón Banegas; Fernando Rodríguez Artalejo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.