Literature DB >> 28210032

A histomorphometric study of necrotic femoral head in rabbits treated with extracorporeal shock waves.

Huan-Zhi Ma1, Dong-Sheng Zhou1, Dong Li1, Wei Zhang1, Bing-Fang Zeng1.   

Abstract

[Purpose] This study aimed to determine the effectiveness and mechanisms of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis.
[Subjects and Methods] Histomorphometric analysis of necrotic femoral head in rabbits treated with shock waves was performed. Bilateral osteonecrosis of femoral heads was induced with methylprednisolone and lipopolysaccharide in eight rabbits. The left limb (study side) received shock waves to the femoral head. The right limb (control side) received no shock waves. Biopsies of the femoral heads were performed at 12 weeks after shock wave therapy.
[Results] Necrotic femoral heads treated with shock waves, compared with controls, had higher bone volume per tissue volume, trabecular thickness, trabecular number, osteoblast surface/bone surface, osteoid surface/bone surface, osteoid thickness, mineralizing surface/bone surface, mineralizing apposition rate, and bone formation rate. However, trabecular separation was lower in shock wave-treated femoral heads than in controls. Eroded surface/bone surface and osteoclast surface/bone surface did not differ significantly between groups.
[Conclusion] The bone mass of necrotic femoral heads treated with shock waves increases. Extracorporeal shock wave may promote bone repair in necrotic femoral heads through the proliferation and activation of osteoblasts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extracorporeal shock wave treatment; Histomorphometry; Osteonecrosis

Year:  2017        PMID: 28210032      PMCID: PMC5300798          DOI: 10.1589/jpts.29.24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci        ISSN: 0915-5287


INTRODUCTION

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head is a progressive clinical condition primarily affecting young and middle-aged patients and is the endpoint of a disease process that results from insufficient circulation and bone-tissue necrosis1, 2). Untreated symptomatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head usually leads to joint instability, collapse of the load-bearing segment of the femoral head, severe osteoarthrosis, and permanent deformity of the femoral head3). The severity of the femoral head deformity is the key factor that determines the long-term outcome of a hip joint. Thus, prevention of deformity is fundamental in obtaining a favorable outcome4). Both nonsurgical and surgical treatment options have been used in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head, such as conservative treatment with analgesics, core decompression, intertrochanteric osteotomy, bone transplants with vascular pedicles, and total hip replacement. Most treatment methods have confirmed limited effects in selected series, but none has demonstrated uniform success5,6,7). Therefore, a new effective and noninvasive alternative method of treatment would be preferable over the current standard of care. Extracorporeal shock waves are acoustic waves of extremely high pressure and velocity. They have been shown to be effective in improving bone healing and increasing bone mass and bone strength8). When shock waves are directed at the bone, the reflection and deposition of shock wave energy can stimulate osteogenesis and angiogenesis9). Shock wave treatment can lead to new bone formation in physiological as well as acutely fractured and pseudarthrotic bone8, 10, 11). Shock wave treatment has been used for the treatment of nonunion in Europe and Asia since the early 1990s11). Recently, the results of extracorporeal shock wave treatment for osteonecrosis of the femoral head have been encouraging. Shock wave treatment appeared to be more effective than core decompression and nonvascularized fibular grafting in patients with early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head, although the underlying working mechanism of shock wave inducing bone repair remains to be fully established12). The aim of this experimental study was investigate changes in the microarchitecture and bone remodeling in necrotic femoral head of rabbits following shock wave treatment with quantitative bone histomorphometric examination.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

All procedures performed in the experiment were approved by the local animal care and use committee. Eight New Zealand white rabbits with a body weight ranging from 3.0 to 4.0 kg were used in this study. Using lipopolysaccharide and methylprednisolone, we induced bilateral femoral head necrosis in these animals according to Yamamoto et al13). Shock wave treatment was applied to the femoral head of the left limb 6 weeks after injection of methylprednisolone. The right limb received no shock wave treatment and was designated as the control side. On the left side, the femoral head received 2000 shock wave impulses at 0.26 mJ/mm2 using an Orthospec (Medispec, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). The shock wave dosage was based on the results of previous studies in animals8, 14). On days 7 and 2 before necropsy, all rabbits were given intramuscular injections of tetracycline hydrochloride (30 mg/kg; Sigma), which was used as fluorochrome bone markers for histomorphometry. The animals were sacrificed with an overdose of pentobarbital at 12 weeks after shock wave treatment. The bilateral femoral heads were harvested and freed of soft tissue and cartilage. They were bisected along the coronal plane and assigned for undecalcified bone processing. Quantitative bone histomorphometric analysis was performed on all the femoral heads. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head was induced with methylprednisolone and lipopolysaccharide. The rabbits were given intravenous injection of 10 µg/kg lipopolysaccharide twice at an interval of 24 hours, and after the second injection of lipopolysaccharide, they were injected intramuscularly with 40 mg/kg of methylprednisolone thrice at intervals of 24 hours. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head occurred at 6 weeks after the third injection of methylprednisolone15). The specimens were fixed with 70% ethanol solution at 4 °C for 2 days, run through the alcohol series for dehydration, embedded in methylmethacrylate, and cut into 7- and 15-μm slices parallel to the coronal plane from the center of the specimen. The 7-μm slices were stained with Goldner stain. The 15-μm slices were mounted unstained for fluorescence microscopy. We evaluated the histomorphometric parameters with semiautomatic Simple PCI image analyzer (Compix, USA). All parameters were expressed according to standardized nomenclature16). For general bone structure, bone volume per tissue volume (BV/TV, %), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th, μm), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp, μm), and trabecular number (Tb.N, mm−1) were measured and calculated. For bone formation, the following parameters were measured and calculated: osteoid surface/bone surface (OS/BS, %), osteoid thickness (O.Th, μm), mineralizing apposition rate (MAR, μm/day), mineralizing surface/bone surface (MS/BS, %), bone formation rate/bone surface (BFR/BS, μm3/μm2/day), and osteoblast surface/bone surface (Ob.S/BS, %). For bone resorption, eroded surface/bone surface (ES/BS, %) and osteoclast surface/bone surface (Oc.S/BS, %) were measured. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The indices of histomorphometry were compared by two-tailed t-test analysis of variance between the shock wave-treated femoral heads and the controls. Differences were considered as statistically significant for p values<0.05.

RESULTS

The histomorphometric indices of general trabecular structure are presented in Table 1. The BV/TV, Tb.Th, and Tb.N were significantly higher in shock wave-treated femoral heads than controls. However, Tb.Sp was significantly lower in shock wave-treated femoral heads (Fig. 1).
Table 1.

Bone structural parameters of shock wave-treated and control femoral heads of rabbits

Bone structural parametersControl group (n=8)Shock wave-treated group (n=8)
BV/TV (%)36.4 ± 4.150.5 ± 6.3**
Tb.Th (μm)113.3 ± 10.4145.0 ± 13.2**
Tb.Sp (μm)167.1 ± 14.9130.6 ± 11.5**
Tb.N (mm−1)3.01 ± 0.284.06 ± 0.81*

Results are shown as mean ± SD. BV/TV: bone volume per tissue volume, Tb.Th: trabecular thickness, Tb.Sp: trabecular separation, Tb.N: trabecular number, *p<0.05, **p<0.01

Fig. 1.

Representative photomicrographs of Goldner-stained bone for untreated control (A) and shock wave–treated (B) necrotic femoral heads. (A) Bone of the necrotic femoral heads untreated with shock waves was sparse and osteoid (arrows) was scarce. (B) Bone of the necrotic femoral heads treated with shock waves had greater bone volume. Abundant osteoid (arrows) was also observed in these femoral heads. (Goldner stain, original magnification ×40).

Results are shown as mean ± SD. BV/TV: bone volume per tissue volume, Tb.Th: trabecular thickness, Tb.Sp: trabecular separation, Tb.N: trabecular number, *p<0.05, **p<0.01 Representative photomicrographs of Goldner-stained bone for untreated control (A) and shock wave–treated (B) necrotic femoral heads. (A) Bone of the necrotic femoral heads untreated with shock waves was sparse and osteoid (arrows) was scarce. (B) Bone of the necrotic femoral heads treated with shock waves had greater bone volume. Abundant osteoid (arrows) was also observed in these femoral heads. (Goldner stain, original magnification ×40). Parameters reflecting bone formation are given in Table 2. The OS/BS, O.Th (Fig. 1), MS/BS, Ob.S/BS, MAR, and BFR/BS (Fig. 2) significantly increased in shock wave-treated femoral heads compared with controls.
Table 2.

Bone formation parameters of shock wave-treated and control femoral heads of rabbits

Bone formation parametersControl group (n=8)Shock wave-treated group (n=8)
OS/BS (%)2.55 ± 0.436.13 ± 1.53**
O.Th (μm)2.99 ± 0.464.14 ± 0.69*
MAR (μm/day)1.43 ± 0.242.23 ± 0.36**
MS/BS (%)6.51 ± 0.5220.08 ± 2.87**
BFR/BS (μm3/μm2/day)0.045 ± 0.0090.126 ± 0.020**
Ob.S/BS (%)2.15 ± 0.357.52 ± 1.40**

Results are shown as mean ± SD. OS/BS: osteoid surface/bone surface, O.Th: osteoid thickness, MAR: mineral apposition rate, MS/BS: mineralizing surface/bone surface, BFR/BS: bone formation rate/bone surface, Ob.S/BS: osteoblast surface/bone surface, *p<0.05, **p<0.01

Fig. 2.

Representative micrographs demonstrating vital stain of bone in untreated control (A) and shock wave–treated (B) necrotic femoral heads. (A) Narrow distances between double fluorescent tetracycline labels in untreated femoral heads were observed. (B) Remarkable distances between double fluorescent tetracycline labels in shock wave–treated femoral heads were marked. (Original magnification ×100).

Results are shown as mean ± SD. OS/BS: osteoid surface/bone surface, O.Th: osteoid thickness, MAR: mineral apposition rate, MS/BS: mineralizing surface/bone surface, BFR/BS: bone formation rate/bone surface, Ob.S/BS: osteoblast surface/bone surface, *p<0.05, **p<0.01 Representative micrographs demonstrating vital stain of bone in untreated control (A) and shock wave–treated (B) necrotic femoral heads. (A) Narrow distances between double fluorescent tetracycline labels in untreated femoral heads were observed. (B) Remarkable distances between double fluorescent tetracycline labels in shock wave–treated femoral heads were marked. (Original magnification ×100). Parameters related to bone resorption are shown in Table 3. There was no significant difference between the two groups in Oc.S/BS and ES/BS.
Table 3.

Bone resorption parameters of shock wave-treated and control femoral heads of rabbits

Bone resorption parametersControl group (n=8)Shock wave–treated group (n=8)
ES/BS (%)15.6 ± 3.312.5 ± 2.9***
Oc.S/BS (%)3.3 ± 0.72.9 ± 0.5***

Results are shown as mean ± SD. ES/BS: eroded surface/bone surface, Oc.S/BS: osteoclast surface/bone surface, ***p>0.05

Results are shown as mean ± SD. ES/BS: eroded surface/bone surface, Oc.S/BS: osteoclast surface/bone surface, ***p>0.05

DISCUSSION

The therapy recommendations for osteonecrosis of the femoral head remain controversial. Current treatment practices vary among conservative treatment, joint-preserving procedures, and total hip replacement. Both conservative and surgical treatment modalities have been used with limited effects5,6,7, 9). Extracorporeal shock wave therapy is a promising technology that has been used in the treatment of various musculoskeletal afflictions, such as tendinopathies, delayed bone healing, pseudarthrosis, and osteonecrosis of the femoral head11, 12, 17). Mechanistic studies demonstrated that extracorporeal shock waves have positive influence on osseous biology through enhanced biomechanical properties, angiogenesis, and augmented osteogenetic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells8, 18, 19). However, the effects of extracorporeal shock waves on the microarchitecture and bone remodeling of the necrotic femoral heads have not been established. The results of this study showed that shock wave treatment promotes bone formation with increased bone mass in necrotic femoral heads of rabbits. Many authors had studied the mechanism of shock wave treatment, and they documented that shock wave therapy was effective in clinical orthopedic practice and basic research because it enhances new bone formation and expression of growth factors8, 10, 11, 20). Our previous studies showed that extracorporeal shock wave treatment significantly upregulated the expression of bone morphogenetic protein 2 and vascular endothelial growth factor in necrotic femoral heads and accelerated the repair process of femoral head necrosis15, 21). Microarchitecture evaluation was considered as an interesting approach to histological evaluation of bone22). We applied histomorphometry in the current study to investigate the detailed changes in subchondral bone of necrotic femoral heads treated with extracorporeal shock waves. The results of this study demonstrate significant structural changes in trabecular bone volume, Tb.Th, Tb.Sp, and Tb.N of subchondral bone of necrotic femoral heads treated with extracorporeal shock waves. Increases in Tb.Th and Tb.N and a decrease in Tb.Sp result in a significant increase in trabecular bone volume. The data provide strong evidence that extracorporeal shock wave therapy promotes marked new bone formation in the necrotic femoral heads. The effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in promoting new bone formation observed in our study is similar to that reported for long bone fracture treated with shock waves8). Changes in bone remodeling may be proposed to explain the increased bone mass of the necrotic femoral heads treated with shock waves. In our study, we found that necrotic femoral heads treated with shock waves, when compared to controls, were characterized by higher Ob.S/BS, OS/BS, and O.Th, MS/BS, MAR, and BFR. These increases in MAR and BFR are indicative of an increase in osteoblastic activity at the cellular level23). Therefore, shock wave treatment appears to have stimulated the proliferation of osteoblasts as well as their activation to produce more and denser bone. Moreover, more osteoid observed in shock wave-treated femoral heads also indicates that shock wave treatment promotes new bone formation. However, there was no significant difference between shock wave-treated femoral heads and the controls in ES/BS and Oc.S/BS. The unchanged resorption of trabecular bone and increased formation of new trabecular bone resulted in increased bone mass and enhanced bone repair in necrotic femoral heads treated with shock waves. The results of this study are identical with those of Tamma et al.24), who showed that shock wave treatment induced bone repair through the proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts and the reduction of their secretion of pro-osteoclastogenic factors. It is therefore highly likely that the positive effect of shock wave treatment on osteoblasts proliferation and their activation in necrotic femoral heads contribute to the mechanism by which shock waves increase new bone formation and promote repair of necrotic femoral heads. In summary, this study documents the general trabecular structure, trabecular formation, and trabecular resorption changes in necrotic femoral heads treated with extracorporeal shock waves. The results of denser trabecular structure and increased bone remodeling demonstrate increased bone repair in shock wave-treated femoral heads, due to proliferation and activation of osteoblasts.

Conflict of interest

No competing interest declared
  24 in total

1.  Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for nonunion of the tibia.

Authors:  Eric A Elster; Alexander Stojadinovic; Jonathan Forsberg; Scott Shawen; Romney C Andersen; Wolfgang Schaden
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.512

2.  Intermittent parathyroid hormone administration stimulates bone formation in the mandibles of aged ovariectomized rats.

Authors:  S C Miller; J Hunziker; M Mecham; T J Wronski
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 3.  Nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: ten years later.

Authors:  Michael A Mont; Lynne C Jones; David S Hungerford
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  The use of extracorporeal shock waves in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eneida Machado Alves; Adriano Tanajura Angrisani; Mittermayer B Santiago
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Shock wave application enhances pertussis toxin protein-sensitive bone formation of segmental femoral defect in rats.

Authors:  Yeung-Jen Chen; Yur-Ren Kuo; Kuender D Yang; Ching-Jen Wang; Hue-Chen Huang; Feng-Sheng Wang
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Shock wave treatment shows dose-dependent enhancement of bone mass and bone strength after fracture of the femur.

Authors:  Ching-Jen Wang; Kuender D Yang; Feng-Sheng Wang; Chia-Chen Hsu; Hsiang-Ho Chen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Upregulation of VEGF in subchondral bone of necrotic femoral heads in rabbits with use of extracorporeal shock waves.

Authors:  Huan-Zhi Ma; Bing-Fang Zeng; Xiao-Lin Li
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Results of conservative management of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. A retrospective review.

Authors:  E S Musso; S N Mitchell; M Schink-Ascani; C A Bassett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Corticosteroid enhances the experimental induction of osteonecrosis in rabbits with Shwartzman reaction.

Authors:  T Yamamoto; K Hirano; H Tsutsui; Y Sugioka; K Sueishi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with avascular necrosis.

Authors:  S Y Wei; J J Klimkiewicz; M Lai; J P Garino; M E Steinberg
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The Effects of the Exposure of Musculoskeletal Tissue to Extracorporeal Shock Waves.

Authors:  Tobias Wuerfel; Christoph Schmitz; Leon L J Jokinen
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-05-06

Review 2.  Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Various Interventions for Nontraumatic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head.

Authors:  Ji Wang; Jing Wang; Kai Zhang; Yanfang Wang; Xuanwen Bao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for bone marrow edema syndrome in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Wenyi Zhao; Yuan Gao; Shouxiang Zhang; Zhang Liu; Lin He; Dahong Zhang; Wei Li; Qinggang Meng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Huo Xue Tong Luo capsule, a vasoactive herbal formula prevents progression of asymptomatic osteonecrosis of femoral head: A prospective study.

Authors:  Qiu-Shi Wei; Guo-Ju Hong; Ying-Jia Yuan; Zhen-Qiu Chen; Qing-Wen Zhang; Wei He
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 5.191

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.