Literature DB >> 28209734

Neural Representations of Observed Actions Generalize across Static and Dynamic Visual Input.

Alon Hafri1, John C Trueswell2, Russell A Epstein2.   

Abstract

People interact with entities in the environment in distinct and categorizable ways (e.g., kicking is making contact with foot). We can recognize these action categories across variations in actors, objects, and settings; moreover, we can recognize them from both dynamic and static visual input. However, the neural systems that support action recognition across these perceptual differences are unclear. Here, we used multivoxel pattern analysis of fMRI data to identify brain regions that support visual action categorization in a format-independent way. Human participants were scanned while viewing eight categories of interactions (e.g., pulling) depicted in two visual formats: (1) visually controlled videos of two interacting actors and (2) visually varied photographs selected from the internet involving different actors, objects, and settings. Action category was decodable across visual formats in bilateral inferior parietal, bilateral occipitotemporal, left premotor, and left middle frontal cortex. In most of these regions, the representational similarity of action categories was consistent across subjects and visual formats, a property that can contribute to a common understanding of actions among individuals. These results suggest that the identified brain regions support action category codes that are important for action recognition and action understanding.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Humans tend to interpret the observed actions of others in terms of categories that are invariant to incidental features: whether a girl pushes a boy or a button and whether we see it in real-time or in a single snapshot, it is still pushing Here, we investigated the brain systems that facilitate the visual recognition of these action categories across such differences. Using fMRI, we identified several areas of parietal, occipitotemporal, and frontal cortex that exhibit action category codes that are similar across viewing of dynamic videos and still photographs. Our results provide strong evidence for the involvement of these brain regions in recognizing the way that people interact physically with objects and other people.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/373056-16$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  action recognition; fMRI; inferior parietal; multivoxel pattern analysis; occipitotemporal; premotor

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28209734      PMCID: PMC6596723          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2496-16.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  8 in total

1.  Social-affective features drive human representations of observed actions.

Authors:  Diana C Dima; Tyler M Tomita; Christopher J Honey; Leyla Isik
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 8.713

2.  Encoding of event roles from visual scenes is rapid, spontaneous, and interacts with higher-level visual processing.

Authors:  Alon Hafri; John C Trueswell; Brent Strickland
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-02-17

3.  Distinct contributions of functional and deep neural network features to representational similarity of scenes in human brain and behavior.

Authors:  Iris Ia Groen; Michelle R Greene; Christopher Baldassano; Li Fei-Fei; Diane M Beck; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  The role of putative human anterior intraparietal sulcus area in observed manipulative action discrimination.

Authors:  Guy A Orban; Stefania Ferri; Artem Platonov
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.708

5.  Distinct roles of temporal and frontoparietal cortex in representing actions across vision and language.

Authors:  Moritz F Wurm; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  The representational space of observed actions.

Authors:  Raffaele Tucciarelli; Moritz Wurm; Elisa Baccolo; Angelika Lingnau
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 7.  Levels of naturalism in social neuroscience research.

Authors:  Siqi Fan; Olga Dal Monte; Steve W C Chang
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-06-12

8.  Neural responses to visually observed social interactions.

Authors:  Jon Walbrin; Paul Downing; Kami Koldewyn
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.139

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.