| Literature DB >> 28209514 |
Julia Kuligowski1, Rønnaug Solberg2, Ángel Sánchez-Illana1, Leonid Pankratov3, Anna Parra-Llorca1, Guillermo Quintás4, Ola Didrik Saugstad3, Máximo Vento5.
Abstract
Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) secondary to perinatal asphyxia is a leading cause of mortality and acquired long-term neurologic co-morbidities in the neonate. The most successful intervention for the treatment of moderate to severe HIE is moderate whole body hypothermia initiated within 6h from birth. The objective and prompt identification of infants who are at risk of developing moderate to severe HIE in the critical first hours still remains a challenge. This work proposes a metabolite score calculated based on the relative intensities of three metabolites (choline, 6,8-dihydroxypurine and hypoxanthine) that showed maximum correlation with hypoxia time in a consolidated piglet model for neonatal hypoxia-ischemia. The metabolite score's performance as a biomarker for perinatal hypoxia and its usefulness for clinical grading and decision making have been assessed and compared to the performance of lactate which is currently considered the gold standard. For plasma samples withdrawn before and directly after a hypoxic insult, the metabolite score performed similar to lactate. However, it provided an enhanced predictive capacity at 2h after resuscitation. The present study evidences the usefulness of the metabolite score for improving the early assessment of the severity of the hypoxic insult based on serial determinations in a minimally invasive biofluid. The applicability of the metabolite score for clinical diagnosis and patient stratification for hypothermia treatment has to be confirmed in multicenter trials involving newborns suffering from HIE.Entities:
Keywords: Hypoxia; Liquid Chromatography – Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (LC-TOF-MS); Metabolic biomarker; Neonatal piglet model; Newborn; Perinatal asphyxia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28209514 PMCID: PMC5310173 DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2017.02.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Redox Biol ISSN: 2213-2317 Impact factor: 11.799
Fig. 1Overview of the study design.
Physiological parameters of piglets in the control and intervention groups at different time points.
| 1810 (±173) | 1889 (±127) | p=0.2 | ||
| 28.7 (±3) | 25.6 (±4) | p=0.12 | ||
| 3/3 | 12/14 | p=1 | ||
| 0 | 53.4 (±17) | p<0.01 | ||
| t0 | 7.2 (±1.0) | 7.3 (±1.1) | p=0.8 | |
| t0 | 7.41(±0.04) | 7.44 (±0.07) | p=0.9 | |
| t1 | 7.42 (±0.03) | 6.86 (±0.07) | p<0.01 | |
| t2 | 7.46(±0.03) | 7.39 (±0.08) | p=0.8 | |
| t0 | 2.25 (±2.8) | 1.89 (±3.4) | p=0.4 | |
| t1 | 1.98 (±2.7) | −19.3 (±2.2) | p<0.01 | |
| t2 | 2.33 (±2.6) | −0.4 (±4.2) | p=0.13 | |
| t0 | 49.4 (±4.9) | 54.4 (±8.1) | p=0.8 | |
| t1 | 48.2 (±7.3) | 22.7 (±8.1) | p=0.02 | |
| t2 | 46.7 (±6.2) | 47.5 (±11.3) | p=0.9 | |
| t0 | 147 (±11) | 144 (±26) | p=0.9 | |
| t1 | 156 (±20) | 160 (±47) | p=1 | |
| t0 | 9.9 (1.0) | 10.6 (1.7) | p=0.4 | |
| t1 | 10.3 (0.8) | 5.0 (0. 6) | p<0.01 | |
| t0 | 5.4 (0.5) | 5.2 (0.8) | p=0.7 | |
| t1 | 5.1 (0.3) | 9.3 (1.1) | p<0.01 |
Values are presented as mean (±s). Hb=hemoglobin; BE=base excess, MABP=mean arterial blood pressure; pO2=partial O2 pressure; pCO2=partial CO2 pressure
Fig. 2Plasma metabolite levels of choline, hypoxanthine, 6,8-dihydroxypurine and lactate. Note: circles represent median concentrations and error bars depict interquartile ranges (IQRs); red: calibration data set; blue: validation data set; black: controls; no lactate values were available for the control group at t1; *= p-vale <0.05 (Wilcoxon rank sum) for comparing t1 or t2 to the corresponding data points at t0; **= p-value <0.01 (Wilcoxon rank sum) for comparing t1 or t2 to the corresponding data points at t0. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article).
Fig. 3PLS predicted vs. measured hypoxia time (top) and lactate vs. measured hypoxia time (bottom). Note: circles=intervention group; squares=control group; blue=t0; red=t1; magenta=t2. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article).
Fig. 4ROC predictions using the metabolite score (left) or lactate (right). Note: Cal=calibration data set; Val=validation data set; Predicted Class Probability=1: non-asphyxiated class; Predicted Class Probability=0: asphyxiated class.
Fig. 5Lactate concentrations (left) and PLS predicted metabolite scores (right) of the validation data at different sample collection time points. Note: open circles represent each measured value; solid circles represent median values; error bars represent IQRs; **=p-value <0.01 (Wilcoxon rank sum) for comparing t1 or t2 to the corresponding data points at t0 after elimination of outliers defined as data points outside 1.5 times the IQR.