| Literature DB >> 28209079 |
AJin Cho1, Seung Min Lee1, Jung Woo Noh1, Don Kyoung Choi2, Yongseong Lee2, Sung Tae Cho2, Ki Kyung Kim2, Young Goo Lee2, Young Ki Lee1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: For many years, creation of an orthotopic neobladder after cystectomy has been popular. In the present study, we measured the extent of metabolic acidosis in patients with ileal neobladders compared with ileal conduits and defined risk factors for development of metabolic acidosis.Entities:
Keywords: Conduit; ileum; metabolic acidosis; neobladder; renal function
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28209079 PMCID: PMC6014508 DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2017.1287733
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ren Fail ISSN: 0886-022X Impact factor: 2.606
Baseline characteristics.
| Ileal neobladder ( | Ileal conduit ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 64.5 ± 8.6 | 69.5 ± 8.1 | 0.007 |
| Males (%) | 83.9 | 69.7 | 0.11 |
| Diabetes mellitus (%) | 14.5 | 18.2 | 0.7 |
| Clinical stage (%) | – | – | 0.01 |
| ≤T1c | 37.1 | 12.1 | – |
| ≥T2a | 62.9 | 87.9 | – |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73m2) | 80.7 ± 20 | 72.7 ± 23.6 | 0.1 |
| Sodium (mEq/L) | 140.2 ± 2.8 | 138.8 ± 2.8 | 0.03 |
| Potassium (mEq/L) | 4.2 ± 0.4 | 3.9 ± 0.5 | 0.03 |
| Chloride (mEq/L) | 103.3 ± 3.5 | 102.1 ± 3.8 | 0.13 |
| pH | 7.43 ± 0.04 | 7.44 ± 0.04 | 0.313 |
| PaCO2 (mmHg) | 37.1 ± 4.6 | 35.9 ± 4.0 | 0.345 |
| HCO3− (mEq/L) | 25.7 ± 2.8 | 25.1 ± 2.3 | 0.375 |
| Base excess (μmol/L) | 1.63 ± 2.53 | 1.20 ± 2.25 | 0.511 |
Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Difference of blood biochemical profile according to urinary diversions.
| One month | One year | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neobladder ( | Conduit ( | Neobladder ( | Conduit ( | |||
| Sodium (mEq/L) | 137.8 ± 4.3 | 136.6 ± 4.6 | 0.2 | 140.0 ± 4.2 | 138.7 ± 3.5 | 0.2 |
| Potassium (mEq/L) | 4.3 ± 0.9 | 3.7 ± 0.6 | 0.003 | 4.4 ± 0.7 | 4.1 ± 0.5 | 0.1 |
| Chloride (mEq/L) | 102.7 ± 13.5 | 101 ± 5.4 | 0.5 | 104.4 ± 4.5 | 101.6 ± 3.8 | 0.01 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73m2) | 68.1 ± 23.0 | 70.2 ± 24.9 | 0.7 | 61.8 ± 23.3 | 67.2 ± 18.1 | 0.3 |
| pH | 7.41 ± 0.04 | 7.43 ± 0.09 | 0.08 | 7.24 ± 0.9 | 7.42 ± 0.07 | 0.5 |
| HCO3− (mmol/L) | 23.0 ± 5.0 | 25.2 ± 3.9 | 0.05 | 23.0 ± 3.9 | 22.8 ± 2.2 | 0.8 |
| PaCO2 (mmHg) | 35.1 ± 7.7 | 37.3 ± 5.8 | 0.2 | 37.5 ± 8.2 | 36.3 ± 7.1 | 0.6 |
Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Occurrence of metabolic acidosis in both groups.
| One month | One year | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal( | MA( | Normal( | MA( | |||
| Neobladder | 40 (69) | 18 (31) | 0.1 | 37 (77.1) | 11 (22.9) | 0.2 |
| Ileal conduit | 23 (85.2) | 4 (14.8) | 18 (90) | 2 (10) | ||
Data expressed as number (%).
MA: metabolic acidosis.
Logistic regression analysis for metabolic acidosis.
| One month | One year | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | ||
| Univariate | ||||
| Age (per year) | 1.02 (0.97–1.08) | 0.4 | 1.10 (1.005–1.19) | 0.04 |
| Male (versus female) | 1.29 (0.37–4.42) | 0.7 | 0.56 (0.15–2.17) | 0.4 |
| Ileal neobladder (versus ileal conduit) | 2.6 (0.78–8.58) | 0.1 | 2.68 (0.54–13.37) | 0.2 |
| eGFR (per mL/min/1.73 m2) | 0.94 (0.91–0.97) | <0.001 | 0.94 (0.92–0.97) | 0.001 |
| Urinary tract infection (versus no) | 1.69 (0.63 –4.53) | 0.3 | 2.07 (0.60–7.13) | 0.3 |
| Urinary tract obstruction (versus no) | 1.99 (0.63–6.32) | 0.3 | 5.67 (1.20–26.87) | 0.03 |
| Multivariate | ||||
| Age (per year) | 1.0 (0.94–1.08) | 0.9 | 1.10 (1.0–1.22) | 0.1 |
| Ileal neobladder (versus ileal conduit) | 2.55 (0.62–10.51) | 0.2 | 2.92 (0.44–19.65) | 0.3 |
| eGFR (per mL/min/1.73 m2) | 0.94 (0.91–0.98) | 0.002 | 0.96 (0.92–1.0) | 0.06 |
| Urinary tract infection (versus no) | 1.19 (0.36–3.90) | 0.8 | 0.83 (0.17–4.15) | 0.8 |
| Urinary tract obstruction (versus no) | 1.20 (0.30–4.69) | 0.8 | 4.53 (0.52–39.39) | 0.2 |
eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Figure 1.Correlation of serum creatinine and (A) pH (r2=0.19, p < 0.001), (B) bicarbonate (r2= 0.23, p < 0.001) one month after urinary diversion.