Abhay Havle1, Vishal Jain2, Md Fazal Ahmed2, Swapna Shedge3, Vivek Dokania2, Vikrant Bagwe2, Ketan Agarwal2. 1. Professor, Department of ENT, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences University , Karad, Maharashtra, India . 2. Residents, Department of ENT, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences University , Karad, Maharashtra, India . 3. Assistant Professor, Department of ENT, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences University , Karad, Maharashtra, India .
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The use of corticosteroids or antihistaminics in treatment of allergic rhinitis is known and practiced since long. The efficacy of topical use of fluticasone propionate and Olopatadine Hydrochloride (HCL) for symptomatic relief of allergic rhinitis has been studied either individually or with other drugs. But very few studies show comparison between these two drugs. AIM: To compare the efficacy of topical use of fluticasone propionate and olopatadine hydrochloride for symptomatic relief of allergic rhinitis. DESIGN: In this single blind, randomized control study, the efficacy of topical use of olopatadine HCL was compared with fluticasone propionate for relieving symptoms of allergic rhinitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The symptomatic cases were randomized in two groups for treatment using either olopatadine HCL or fluticasone propionate respectively. In each group, the Total Symptom Scores (TSS) and individual symptom scores were recorded before and after treatment with the help of symptom evaluation scale. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Chi-square test, unpaired t-test, Mann Witney U-test, and Wilcoxon signed Rank test were used during analysis. The results of the comparison were noted and analysed. RESULTS: During four week study period both TSS and individual symptom score were reduced (p<0.05) in either groups. The TSS decreased by an average of 85.07% for those treated with olopatadine and by 95.55% for those treated with fluticasone. CONCLUSION: Overall fluticasone propionate was superior to olopatadine in relieving symptoms of allergic rhinitis (p<0.005).
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: The use of corticosteroids or antihistaminics in treatment of allergic rhinitis is known and practiced since long. The efficacy of topical use of fluticasone propionate and Olopatadine Hydrochloride (HCL) for symptomatic relief of allergic rhinitis has been studied either individually or with other drugs. But very few studies show comparison between these two drugs. AIM: To compare the efficacy of topical use of fluticasone propionate and olopatadine hydrochloride for symptomatic relief of allergic rhinitis. DESIGN: In this single blind, randomized control study, the efficacy of topical use of olopatadine HCL was compared with fluticasone propionate for relieving symptoms of allergic rhinitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The symptomatic cases were randomized in two groups for treatment using either olopatadine HCL or fluticasone propionate respectively. In each group, the Total Symptom Scores (TSS) and individual symptom scores were recorded before and after treatment with the help of symptom evaluation scale. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Chi-square test, unpaired t-test, Mann Witney U-test, and Wilcoxon signed Rank test were used during analysis. The results of the comparison were noted and analysed. RESULTS: During four week study period both TSS and individual symptom score were reduced (p<0.05) in either groups. The TSS decreased by an average of 85.07% for those treated with olopatadine and by 95.55% for those treated with fluticasone. CONCLUSION: Overall fluticasone propionate was superior to olopatadine in relieving symptoms of allergic rhinitis (p<0.005).
Entities:
Keywords:
Nasal obstruction; Orbital cellulitis; Pruritus; Rhinorrhea
Authors: J Bousquet; N Khaltaev; A A Cruz; J Denburg; W J Fokkens; A Togias; T Zuberbier; C E Baena-Cagnani; G W Canonica; C van Weel; I Agache; N Aït-Khaled; C Bachert; M S Blaiss; S Bonini; L-P Boulet; P-J Bousquet; P Camargos; K-H Carlsen; Y Chen; A Custovic; R Dahl; P Demoly; H Douagui; S R Durham; R Gerth van Wijk; O Kalayci; M A Kaliner; Y-Y Kim; M L Kowalski; P Kuna; L T T Le; C Lemiere; J Li; R F Lockey; S Mavale-Manuel; E O Meltzer; Y Mohammad; J Mullol; R Naclerio; R E O'Hehir; K Ohta; S Ouedraogo; S Palkonen; N Papadopoulos; G Passalacqua; R Pawankar; T A Popov; K F Rabe; J Rosado-Pinto; G K Scadding; F E R Simons; E Toskala; E Valovirta; P van Cauwenberge; D-Y Wang; M Wickman; B P Yawn; A Yorgancioglu; O M Yusuf; H Zar; I Annesi-Maesano; E D Bateman; A Ben Kheder; D A Boakye; J Bouchard; P Burney; W W Busse; M Chan-Yeung; N H Chavannes; A Chuchalin; W K Dolen; R Emuzyte; L Grouse; M Humbert; C Jackson; S L Johnston; P K Keith; J P Kemp; J-M Klossek; D Larenas-Linnemann; B Lipworth; J-L Malo; G D Marshall; C Naspitz; K Nekam; B Niggemann; E Nizankowska-Mogilnicka; Y Okamoto; M P Orru; P Potter; D Price; S W Stoloff; O Vandenplas; G Viegi; D Williams Journal: Allergy Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 13.146
Authors: Dana V Wallace; Mark S Dykewicz; David I Bernstein; Joann Blessing-Moore; Linda Cox; David A Khan; David M Lang; Richard A Nicklas; John Oppenheimer; Jay M Portnoy; Christopher C Randolph; Diane Schuller; Sheldon L Spector; Stephen A Tilles Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Eli O Meltzer; Frank C Hampel; Paul H Ratner; David I Bernstein; Lawrence V Larsen; William E Berger; Albert F Finn; Bradley F Marple; Peter S Roland; G Michael Wall; Michael J Brubaker; Carolyn Dimas; Susan L Potts; Lewis H Silver; J Rod Barnes Journal: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 6.347
Authors: Mark S Dykewicz; Harold B Kaiser; Robert A Nathan; Stacey Goode-Sellers; Cindy K Cook; Lori A Witham; Edward E Philpot; Kathleen Rickard Journal: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 6.347
Authors: Paul H Ratner; Frank Hampel; Julius Van Bavel; N J Amar; Pramila Daftary; William Wheeler; Harry Sacks Journal: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 6.347