| Literature DB >> 28208715 |
Prabha Devi1, Solimabi Wahidullah2, Farhan Sheikh3, Rochelle Pereira4, Niteen Narkhede5, Divya Amonkar6, Supriya Tilvi7, Ram Murthy Meena8.
Abstract
Lysinibacillus sphaericus D3 cell-immobilized beads in natural gel sodium alginate decolorized the xylidine orange dye 1-(dimethylphenylazo)-2-naphthol-6-sulfonic acid sodium salt in the laboratory. Optimal conditions were selected for decolorization and the products formed were evaluated for toxicity by disc diffusion assay against common marine bacteria which revealed the non-toxic nature of the dye-degraded products. Decolorization of the brightly colored dye to colorless products was measured on an Ultra Violet-Vis spectrophotometer and its biodegradation products monitored on Thin Layer Chromatographic plate and High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). Finally, the metabolites formed in the decolorized medium were characterized by mass spectrometry. This analysis confirms the conversion of the parent molecule into lower molecular weight aromatic phenols and sulfonic acids as the final products of biotransformation. Based on the results, the probable degradation products of xylidine orange were naphthol, naphthylamine-6-sulfonic acid, 2-6-dihydroxynaphthalene, and bis-dinaphthylether. Thus, it may be concluded that the degradation pathway of the dye involved (a) reduction of its azo group by azoreductase enzyme (b) dimerization of the hydrazo compound followed by (c) degradation of monohydrazo as well as dimeric metabolites into low molecular weight aromatics. Finally, it may be worth exploring the possibility of commercially utilizing L. sphaericus D3 for industrial applications for treating large-scale dye waste water.Entities:
Keywords: alginate-immobilized bacteria; analytical biotechnology; biotechnological application; sponge-associated bacteria
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28208715 PMCID: PMC5334610 DOI: 10.3390/md15020030
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Structure of xylidine orange Dye.
Figure 2Positive Liquid Chromatography Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry (LC ESI-MS) of xylidine orange dye (A) and tandem mass fragmentation (B) of [M + H]+ ion at m/z 379.
Scheme 1Fragmentation pathway observed in tandem mass spectrum of xylidine orange.
Figure 3(A) Gelliodes cellaria (B) Associated bacteria.
Figure 4Phylogenetic tree based on 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) gene sequence showing the phylogenetic relationship between D3 and related strain for identification.
Conditions in which the cells of Lysinibacillus sphaericus decolorize xylidine orange dye and the optimum conditions in which the present study was performed.
| Parameters | Condition Causing Decolorization | Optimum Conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Free/encapsulated cells | Free as well as encapsulated | Encapsulated in alginate beads |
| Medium: liquid/solid | Both types | Liquid Nutrient Agar (NA) medium |
| pH | 5–11 | 7.2 |
| Temp | 26–34 °C | 28 °C |
| Saline/fresh water | 0–25 g/L | 16 g/L |
| Medium strength | Half/full strength | Full strength |
| Shaking/stationary | Both conditions | Shaker at 120 rpm |
| Reuse of beads | Upto threeuses | First use |
| Number of beads | Optional(3–35 beads/100 mL) | 27 beads/100 mL |
| Use of unlyophilized/lyophilized beads | Both produced results (8–10 h) Lyophilized beads stored for 1–3 months | Cells aged one week |
Figure 5Degradation of dye in 500 mL medium with variation in L. sphaericus D3-immobilized bead numbers.
Toxicity screening of xylidine dye (25 µg/disc) against randomly selected marine bacteria.
| Marine Bacterium (Gram Characteristics) | Dye (Untreated) | Treated Dye |
|---|---|---|
| - | - | |
| + (2 mm) | - | |
| + (3 mm) | - | |
| - | - | |
| + (1 mm) | - | |
| - | - | |
| - | - | |
| - | - | |
| - | - | |
| - | - | |
| - | - | |
| - | - |
- no halo around the disc; + halo formed around the disc., G+ Gram positive, G- Gram negative.
Fragmentation of degradation products of xylidine orange as observed by LC ESI-MS/MS.
| Product | Mass/Charge ( | Collision Energy (V) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dye alone ( | [M + H]+ 379 | 3.34 × 107 | 379, 362, 298, 223, 158, 156, 128 |
| Dimer ( | [M + H]+ 743 | 4.69 × 105 | 742, 724, 625, 588, 567, 512, 484, 441 (100%), 358, 324, 211, 169, 120 |
| ( | [M + H]+ 472 | 1.29 × 107 | 472, 227 |
| ( | [M + H]+ 344 | 3.60 × 107 | 344, 211, 212 |
| ( | [M + H]+ 508 | 2.38 × 107 | 508, 439, 245, 246 |
| ( | [M + H]+ 245 | 1.10 × 107 | 245, 217, 172, 154, 120 (100%), 98, 86, 70 |
| ( | [M + H]+ 166 | 1.25 × 108 | 166, 167 |
| ( | [M + H]+ 227 | 1.56 × 107 | 227, 197 |
| ( | [M + H]+ 205 | 1.69 × 107 | 205, 206 |
Scheme 2Proposed fragmentation pathway of degradation of xylidine orange dye by L. sphaericus D3 as analyzed by Liquid Chromatography Electrospray Ionization-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS).
Scheme 3Identification of dimer (2) as one of the biotransformation products of xylidine orange from tandem mass (MS/MS) fragmentation of m/z 742 data.