| Literature DB >> 28208644 |
Junqi Jia1, Weiwei Zhang2, Zengjie Yang3, Xianling Yang4, Na Wang5, Xiaoqi Yu6.
Abstract
The utilization of renewable biomass resources to produce high-value chemicals by enzymatic processes is beneficial for alternative energy production, due to the accelerating depletion of fossil fuels. As immobilization techniques can improve enzyme stability and reusability, a novel magnetic cross-linked cellulase aggregate has been developed and applied for biomass bioconversion. The crosslinked aggregates could purify and immobilize enzymes in a single operation, and could then be combined with magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs), which provides easy separation of the materials. The immobilized cellulase showed a better activity at a wider temperature range and pH values than that of the free cellulase. After six cycles of consecutive reuse, the immobilized cellulase performed successful magnetic separation and retained 74% of its initial activity when carboxylmethyl cellulose (CMC) was used as the model substrate. Furthermore, the structure and morphology of the immobilized cellulase were studied by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Moreover, the immobilized cellulase was shown to hydrolyze bamboo biomass with a yield of 21%, and was re-used in biomass conversion up to four cycles with 38% activity retention, which indicated that the immobilized enzyme has good potential for biomass applications.Entities:
Keywords: biomass; cellulase; cross-linked enzyme aggregates; hydrolysis; magnetic nanoparticles
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28208644 PMCID: PMC6155674 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22020269
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of (a) Fe3O4; (b) cellulase-cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs); (c) 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane (APTES)-Fe3O4; (d) magnetic-cellulase-CLEAs.
Figure 2Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of (a) Fe3O4; (b) APTES-Fe3O4; (c) cellulase-CLEAs; (d) magnetic-cellulase-CLEAs.
Figure 3Precipitation of cellulase with different precipitants.
Figure 4Effect of the glutaraldehyde concentration on the activity of immobilized cellulose.
Figure 5Effect of the weight ratio (cellulase to nanoparticles) on the activity of immobilized cellulose.
Figure 6Effect of pH on the activity of immobilized cellulase.
Figure 7Effect of temperature on the activity of immobilized cellulase.
Figure 8The carboxylmethyl cellulose (CMC) reusability of the immobilized cellulase.
Figure 9The hydrolysis of pretreated biomass using free and immobilized cellulase.
Figure 10The relative hydrolysis activity of the pretreated biomass using immobilized cellulase.