| Literature DB >> 28207856 |
K Shahzad1, A S Nizami1, M Sagir2, M Rehan1, S Maier3, M Z Khan4, O K M Ouda5, I M I Ismail1, A O BaFail6.
Abstract
In the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), millions of Muslims come to perform Pilgrimage every year. Around one million ton of municipal solid waste (MSW) is generated in Makkah city annually. The collected MSW is disposed of in the landfills without any treatment or energy recovery. As a result, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and contamination of the soil and water bodies along with leachate and odors are occurring in waste disposal vicinities. The composition of MSW shows that food waste is the largest waste stream (up to 51%) of the total generated MSW. About 13% of the food waste consists of fat content that is equivalent to about 64 thousand tons per year. This study aims to estimate the production potential of biodiesel first time in Makkah city from fat/oil fractions of MSW and highlight its economic and environmental benefits. It has been estimated that 62.53, 117.15 and 6.38 thousand tons of biodiesel, meat and bone meal (MBM) and glycerol respectively could be produced in 2014. A total electricity potential of 852 Gigawatt hour (GWh) from all three sources based on their energy contents, Higher Heating Value (HHV) of 40.17, 18.33 and 19 MJ/kg, was estimated for 2014 that will increase up to 1777 GWh in 2050. The cumulative net savings from landfill waste diversion (256 to 533 million Saudi Riyal (SAR)), carbon credits (46 to 96 million SAR), fuel savings (146 to 303 million SAR) and electricity generation (273 to 569 million SAR) have a potential to add a total net revenue of 611 to 1274 million SAR every year to the Saudi economy, from 2014 to 2050 respectively. However, further studies including real-time data about annual slaughtering activities and the amount of waste generation and its management are critical to decide optimum waste management practices based on life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) methodologies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28207856 PMCID: PMC5313203 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171297
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Distribution of food waste fractions in Makkah city [14].
Fig 2Process flow diagram for biodiesel production from fat/oil fraction of MSW in Makkah city.
Projected values of different fat related fraction in Makkah from 2014 to 2050.
| Year | Fat Fraction (thousand ton/yr) | Tallow (thousand ton/yr) | UCO (thousand ton/yr) | Rendering material (thousand ton/yr) | MBM (thousand ton/yr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 63.81 | 63.08 | 0.73 | 450.56 | 117.15 |
| 2020 | 74.27 | 73.46 | 0.82 | 524.69 | 136.42 |
| 2026 | 85.09 | 84.01 | 1.08 | 600.08 | 156.02 |
| 2032 | 96.30 | 95.13 | 1.18 | 679.47 | 176.66 |
| 2038 | 107.98 | 106.70 | 1.28 | 762.13 | 198.15 |
| 2044 | 120.19 | 118.80 | 1.39 | 848.56 | 220.63 |
| 2050 | 133.02 | 131.51 | 1.51 | 939.34 | 244.23 |
Electricity production potential from biodiesel, glycerol, and MBM.
| Years | MBM Production Potential (thousand tons/yr) | Electricity potential from MBM (GWh/yr) | Biodiesel Production (thousand tons) | Electricity potential from biodiesel (GWh/yr) | Glycerol production (thousand tons/yr) | Electricity potential from glycerol (GWh/yr) | Total electricity production potential (GWh/yr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 117.15 | 596.30 | 62.53 | 244.19 | 6.38 | 11.79 | 852.28 |
| 2020 | 136.42 | 694.41 | 72.79 | 284.25 | 7.43 | 13.72 | 992.38 |
| 2026 | 156.02 | 794.19 | 83.39 | 325.64 | 8.51 | 15.72 | 1135.55 |
| 2032 | 176.66 | 899.26 | 94.38 | 368.57 | 9.63 | 17.79 | 1285.61 |
| 2038 | 198.15 | 1008.65 | 105.82 | 413.26 | 10.80 | 19.95 | 1441.86 |
| 2044 | 220.63 | 1123.05 | 117.79 | 459.99 | 12.02 | 22.20 | 1605.24 |
| 2050 | 244.23 | 1243.19 | 130.36 | 509.07 | 13.30 | 24.57 | 1776.83 |
Cumulative projection of slaughterhouse waste and UCO with their relevant GHG emissions potential.
| Years | Slaughterhouse waste + UCO (thousand tons) | CH4 emission potential (thousand tons) | GWP (thousand ton CO2 eq.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 451.29 | 21.41 | 535.14 |
| 2020 | 525.51 | 24.93 | 623.15 |
| 2026 | 601.16 | 28.51 | 712.86 |
| 2032 | 680.65 | 32.28 | 807.11 |
| 2038 | 763.41 | 36.21 | 905.25 |
| 2044 | 849.95 | 40.32 | 1007.88 |
| 2050 | 940.85 | 44.63 | 1115.66 |
a using IPCC methodology
b based on GWP of 25 for methane (CH4).
Detailed economic analysis of esterification implementation in Makkah city.
| years | Slaughterhouse waste + UCO (thousand tons) | Saving from Landfill diversion | Revenue from Carbon Credits | Revenue from Electricity generation | Revenue from oil and gas saving (x 106 SAR)/yr | Gross revenue from esterification technology | Net revenue from esterification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 451.29 | 255.88 | 46.16 | 272.73 | 145.54 | 720.31 | 611.22 |
| 2020 | 525.51 | 297.96 | 53.75 | 317.56 | 169.47 | 838.74 | 711.72 |
| 2026 | 601.16 | 340.86 | 61.48 | 363.38 | 193.92 | 959.64 | 814.29 |
| 2032 | 680.65 | 385.93 | 69.61 | 411.40 | 219.54 | 1086.48 | 921.92 |
| 2038 | 763.41 | 432.85 | 78.08 | 461.40 | 246.23 | 1218.55 | 1034.00 |
| 2044 | 849.95 | 481.92 | 86.93 | 513.68 | 274.13 | 1356.66 | 1151.18 |
| 2050 | 940.85 | 533.46 | 96.23 | 568.59 | 303.43 | 1501.70 | 1274.27 |
a 567 SAR/ton gate fee
b at a cost of US $23.20/tonne of CO2. (US$ 1 = 3.750 SAR)
c at SAR 0.32/kWh.
d gross revenue = saving from landfill diversion + carbon credits + electricity generation + oil and gas savings
e net revenue = Gross revenue–Operating & maintenance cost of esterification technology.
Fig 3Projection of population, pilgrims, MSW and food waste fraction (million tons) in the city of Makkah from 2014 till 2050.
Potential revenue in terms of oil & gas savings used for electricity production.
| Years | Energy potential (GWh/yr) | Oil saving (bbl 106)/yr | Revenue from oil saving (SAR 106) | Natural gas saving (Mcf 106)/yr | Revenue from gas saving (SAR 106) | Total Savings from oil & gas saving (SAR 106)/yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 852.28 | 0.83 | 118.85 | 3.85 | 26.70 | 145.54 |
| 2020 | 992.38 | 0.96 | 138.39 | 4.48 | 31.08 | 169.47 |
| 2026 | 1135.55 | 1.10 | 158.35 | 5.13 | 35.57 | 193.92 |
| 2032 | 1285.61 | 1.25 | 179.28 | 5.80 | 40.27 | 219.54 |
| 2038 | 1441.86 | 1.40 | 201.06 | 6.51 | 45.16 | 246.23 |
| 2044 | 1605.24 | 1.56 | 223.85 | 7.25 | 50.28 | 274.13 |
| 2050 | 1776.83 | 1.72 | 247.77 | 8.02 | 55.65 | 303.43 |
*based on oil price: US$38.33/bbl brent crude oil [35]
**natural gas: US$1.8/MMBtu or US$1.85/Mcf [35]