Literature DB >> 28207167

BISAP, RANSON, lactate and others biomarkers in prediction of severe acute pancreatitis in a European cohort.

Francisco Valverde-López1, Ana M Matas-Cobos1, Carlos Alegría-Motte1, Rita Jiménez-Rosales1, Margarita Úbeda-Muñoz1, Eduardo Redondo-Cerezo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The study aims to assess and compare the predicting ability of some scores and biomarkers in acute pancreatitis.
METHODS: We prospectively collected data from 269 patients diagnosed of acute pancreatitis, admitted to Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital between June 2010 and June 2012. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN), C-reactive protein, and creatinine were measured on admission and after 48 h, lactate and bedside index for severity acute pancreatitis (BISAP) only on admission and RANSON within the first 48 h. Definitions from 2012 Atlanta Classification were used. Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for each scoring system for predicting severe acute pancreatitis (SAP), mortality, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission, obtaining optimal cut-off values from the receiver operating characteristic curves.
RESULTS: Eight (3%) patients died, 17 (6.3%) were classified as SAP, and 10 (3.7%) were admitted in ICU. BISAP was the best predictor on admission for SAP, mortality, and ICU admission with an AUC of 0.9 (95% CI 0.83-0.97); 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.99); and 0.89 (95% CI 0.79-0.99), respectively. After 48 h, BUN 48 h was the best predictor of SAP (AUC = 0.96 CI: 0.92-0.99); BUN 48 h and BISAP were the best predictors for mortality (AUC = 0.97 CI: 0.95-0.99) and creatinine 48 h for ICU admission (AUC = 0.96 CI: 0.92-0.99). Lactate showed an AUC of 0.79 (CI: 0.71-0.88), 0.87 (CI: 0.78-0.96), and 0.77 (CI: 0.67-0.87) for SAP, mortality, and ICU admission, respectively. All parameters were predictors for SAP, mortality, and ICU admission, but C-reactive protein on admission was only a significant predictor of SAP.
CONCLUSION: Bedside index for severity acute pancreatitis is a good predictive system for SAP, mortality, and ICU admission, being useful for triaging patients for ICU management. Lactate could be useful for developing new scores.
© 2017 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical acute pancreatitis; epidemiology; pancreas

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28207167     DOI: 10.1111/jgh.13763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  17 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic value of admission red blood cell distribution width in acute pancreatitis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hemant Goyal; Hamza Awad; Zhi-De Hu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-09

2.  Usefulness of Random Forest Algorithm in Predicting Severe Acute Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Wandong Hong; Yajing Lu; Xiaoying Zhou; Shengchun Jin; Jingyi Pan; Qingyi Lin; Shaopeng Yang; Zarrin Basharat; Maddalena Zippi; Hemant Goyal
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 6.073

3.  The relationship between triglyceride level and the severity of acute hypertriglyceridemic pancreatitis in Chinese patients.

Authors:  Ya Mei Sun; Feng Gao; Xue Chen; Jie Zhang
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Gallstone Pancreatitis: Admission Versus Normal Cholecystectomy-a Randomized Trial (Gallstone PANC Trial).

Authors:  Krislynn M Mueck; Shuyan Wei; Claudia Pedroza; Karla Bernardi; Margaret L Jackson; Mike K Liang; Tien C Ko; Jon E Tyson; Lillian S Kao
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Red cell distribution width and red cell distribution width to total serum calcium ratio as major predictors of severity and mortality in acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Marta Gravito-Soares; Elisa Gravito-Soares; Dário Gomes; Nuno Almeida; Luís Tomé
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 6.  2019 WSES guidelines for the management of severe acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Ari Leppäniemi; Matti Tolonen; Antonio Tarasconi; Helmut Segovia-Lohse; Emiliano Gamberini; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Chad G Ball; Neil Parry; Massimo Sartelli; Daan Wolbrink; Harry van Goor; Gianluca Baiocchi; Luca Ansaloni; Walter Biffl; Federico Coccolini; Salomone Di Saverio; Yoram Kluger; Ernest Moore; Fausto Catena
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Are traditional scoring systems for severity stratification of acute pancreatitis sufficient?

Authors:  Thaddaeus Tan Jun Kiat; Sivaraj K Gunasekaran; Sameer P Junnarkar; Jee Keem Low; Winston Woon; Vishal G Shelat
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2018-05-30

8.  Protocol for a randomized trial of the effect of timing of cholecystectomy during initial admission for predicted mild gallstone pancreatitis at a safety-net hospital.

Authors:  Krislynn M Mueck; Shuyan Wei; Mike K Liang; Tien C Ko; Jon E Tyson; Lillian S Kao
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2018-01-20

9.  Initially elevated arterial lactate as an independent predictor of poor outcomes in severe acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Wenqing Shu; Jianhua Wan; Jie Chen; Wenhua He; Yong Zhu; Hao Zeng; Pi Liu; Yin Zhu; Liang Xia; Nonghua Lu
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 10.  Is aggressive intravenous fluid resuscitation beneficial in acute pancreatitis? A meta-analysis of randomized control trials and cohort studies.

Authors:  Mohamed M Gad; C Roberto Simons-Linares
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.