Literature DB >> 28206728

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass vs. laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of lipid effects at one year postsurgery.

Elisenda Climent1,2, David Benaiges3,2,4, Juan Pedro-Botet1,2,4, Albert Goday1,2,4,5, Ivan Solà6,7, José M Ramón4,8, Juana A Flores-LE Roux1,2,4, Miguel Á Checa9,10,11.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Results of the effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (GB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) on triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels are controversial. Moreover, previous meta-analyses focused on global dyslipidemia remission, but did not include the separate remission rates of the different lipid fractions. Hence, the aim of the present meta-analysis was to compare the outcomes (concentration change and remission rates) of GB and SG on diverse lipid disorders one year postbariatric surgery (BS). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: An exhaustive electronic search carried out on MedLine, Embase and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central) until July 2016 yielded 2621 records, of which 17, totaling 4699 obese patients with one-year follow-up after BS were included in the meta-analysis. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: GB was superior to SG in terms of total cholesterol (mean difference= 19.77 mg/dL, 95% CI: 11.84-27.69) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (mean difference: 19.29 mg/dL, 95% CI: 11.93-26.64) decreases as well as in hypercholesterolemia remission (RR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.27-1.61). No differences were found between GB and SG in terms of HDL cholesterol increase or triglyceride concentration change after surgery, as well as in hypertriglyceridemia and low HDL remission rates.
CONCLUSIONS: The effect of GB on total and LDL cholesterol concentration decreases and remission was greater than that of SG, whereas no differences were observed with respect to HDL cholesterol and triglyceride concentration evolution. Conclusions cannot be drawn from hypertriglyceridemia and low HDL remission rates based on this meta-analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28206728     DOI: 10.23736/S0391-1977.17.02627-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Endocrinol        ISSN: 0391-1977            Impact factor:   2.184


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Will laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy continue to exist as a stand-alone procedure? : A procedure critical perspective].

Authors:  A Dietrich
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  T and B Cell Composition and Cytokine Producing Capacity Before and After Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  L H Wijngaarden; A E Taselaar; F Nuijten; E van der Harst; R A Klaassen; T M Kuijper; F Jongbloed; G Ambagtsheer; M Klepper; J N M IJzermans; R W F de Bruin; N H R Litjens
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 8.786

3.  Treatment preference among patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA): a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Alisha Monnette; Er Chen; Dongzhe Hong; Alessandra Bazzano; Stacy Dixon; W David Arnold; Lizheng Shi
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 4.123

4.  Bariatric surgery and LDL cholesterol (BASALTO) trial study protocol: randomised controlled study evaluating the effect of gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy on high LDL cholesterol.

Authors:  David Benaiges; Albert Goday; Juana A Flores-Le Roux; Montserrat Fitó; Oscar Pozo; Jose Rodríguez-Morató; Carme Serra; Manuel Pera; Gemma Llauradó; Elisenda Climent; Olga Castañer; Jose M Ramon; Juan Pedro-Botet
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Characterizing Timing of Postoperative Complications Following Elective Roux-en-Y gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Anna S Mierzwa; Valentin Mocanu; Gabriel Marcil; Jerry Dang; Noah J Switzer; Daniel W Birch; Shahzeer Karmali
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 4.129

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.