C Boikos1, C Caya1, M K Doll1, H Kraicer-Melamed1, M Dolph1, G Delisle, N Winters1, G Gore2, C Quach1,3,4. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. 2. Life Sciences Library, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, The Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada. 4. Department of Microbiology, Infectious Disease, and Immunology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Abstract
Objectives: To review systematically the published literature evaluating neuraminidase inhibitor (NI) safety and effectiveness in situations of pandemic and novel/variant influenza. Methods: We searched six online databases using comprehensive search criteria for observational studies and randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of NI treatment, prophylaxis or outbreak control in patients of all ages. Results: Overall, 165 studies were included (95% observational), which were generally of low methodological quality due to lack of adjustment for confounding variables. In studies reporting adjusted estimates in general populations, NI treatment appeared likely to be effective against mortality (primarily if administered within 48 h of symptom onset) and potentially effective in reducing pneumonia. NIs appeared effective in reducing secondary transmission when indicated for prophylaxis. Limited, low-quality data suggest NIs are likely safe in general populations and may be safe in pregnant women and children. Data are scarce regarding safety of NIs in adults and high-risk individuals. Conclusions: Most included studies were observational, statistically underpowered and at high risk of reporting biased and/or confounded effect estimates. NI treatment appeared likely effective in reducing mortality (cause unspecified) and pneumonia in general populations, with increasing benefit when administered with 48 h of symptom onset. NI pre- or post-exposure prophylaxis is likely effective in reducing secondary transmission of influenza in a general population. Our evidence suggests NIs are likely safe to use in the general population; however, data for children and pregnant women are limited. Knowledge gaps persist in specific populations such as Aboriginals, high-risk individuals and the elderly.
Objectives: To review systematically the published literature evaluating neuraminidase inhibitor (NI) safety and effectiveness in situations of pandemic and novel/variant influenza. Methods: We searched six online databases using comprehensive search criteria for observational studies and randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of NI treatment, prophylaxis or outbreak control in patients of all ages. Results: Overall, 165 studies were included (95% observational), which were generally of low methodological quality due to lack of adjustment for confounding variables. In studies reporting adjusted estimates in general populations, NI treatment appeared likely to be effective against mortality (primarily if administered within 48 h of symptom onset) and potentially effective in reducing pneumonia. NIs appeared effective in reducing secondary transmission when indicated for prophylaxis. Limited, low-quality data suggest NIs are likely safe in general populations and may be safe in pregnant women and children. Data are scarce regarding safety of NIs in adults and high-risk individuals. Conclusions: Most included studies were observational, statistically underpowered and at high risk of reporting biased and/or confounded effect estimates. NI treatment appeared likely effective in reducing mortality (cause unspecified) and pneumonia in general populations, with increasing benefit when administered with 48 h of symptom onset. NI pre- or post-exposure prophylaxis is likely effective in reducing secondary transmission of influenza in a general population. Our evidence suggests NIs are likely safe to use in the general population; however, data for children and pregnant women are limited. Knowledge gaps persist in specific populations such as Aboriginals, high-risk individuals and the elderly.
Authors: Dejan Radovanovic; Giovanni Sotgiu; Mateja Jankovic; Padukudru Anand Mahesh; Pedro Jorge Marcos; Mohamed I Abdalla; Marta Francesca Di Pasquale; Andrea Gramegna; Silvia Terraneo; Francesco Blasi; Pierachille Santus; Stefano Aliberti; Luis F Reyes; Marcos I Restrepo Journal: Eur J Intern Med Date: 2018-11-04 Impact factor: 4.487
Authors: Eun Jeong Joo; Jae Hoon Ko; Seong Eun Kim; Seung Ji Kang; Ji Hyeon Baek; Eun Young Heo; Hye Jin Shi; Joong Sik Eom; Pyoeng Gyun Choe; Seongman Bae; Sang Hyun Ra; Da Young Kim; Baek Nam Kim; Yu Min Kang; Ji Yeon Kim; Jin Won Chung; Hyun Ha Chang; Sohyun Bae; Shinhyea Cheon; Yoonseon Park; Heun Choi; Eunjung Lee; Bo Young Lee; Jung Wan Park; Yujin Sohn; Jung Yeon Heo; Sung Han Kim; Kyong Ran Peck Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2021-03-22 Impact factor: 2.153