Literature DB >> 28203539

Cost effectiveness of robotic mitral valve surgery.

Emmanuel Moss1, Michael E Halkos2.   

Abstract

Significant technological advances have led to an impressive evolution in mitral valve surgery over the last two decades, allowing surgeons to safely perform less invasive operations through the right chest. Most new technology comes with an increased upfront cost that must be measured against postoperative savings and other advantages such as decreased perioperative complications, faster recovery, and earlier return to preoperative level of functioning. The Da Vinci robot is an example of such a technology, combining the significant benefits of minimally invasive surgery with a "gold standard" valve repair. Although some have reported that robotic surgery is associated with increased overall costs, there is literature suggesting that efficient perioperative care and shorter lengths of stay can offset the increased capital and intraoperative expenses. While data on current cost is important to consider, one must also take into account future potential value resulting from technological advancement when evaluating cost-effectiveness. Future refinements that will facilitate more effective surgery, coupled with declining cost of technology will further increase the value of robotic surgery compared to traditional approaches.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Robotic; cost effectiveness; mitral valve

Year:  2017        PMID: 28203539      PMCID: PMC5293631          DOI: 10.21037/acs.2017.01.03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 2225-319X


  13 in total

1.  Robotic repair of posterior mitral valve prolapse versus conventional approaches: potential realized.

Authors:  Tomislav Mihaljevic; Craig M Jarrett; A Marc Gillinov; Sarah J Williams; Pierre A DeVilliers; William J Stewart; Lars G Svensson; Joseph F Sabik; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Activity-based costs of blood transfusions in surgical patients at four hospitals.

Authors:  Aryeh Shander; Axel Hofmann; Sherri Ozawa; Oliver M Theusinger; Hans Gombotz; Donat R Spahn
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 3.  Is robotic mitral valve surgery more expensive than its conventional counterpart?

Authors:  Leonardo Secchin Canale; Alexandre Siciliano Colafranceschi
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-03-10

4.  Quality of life after early mitral valve repair using conventional and robotic approaches.

Authors:  Rakesh M Suri; Ryan M Antiel; Harold M Burkhart; Marianne Huebner; Zhuo Li; David T Eton; Tali Topilsky; Maurice E Sarano; Hartzell V Schaff
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Value of robotically assisted surgery for mitral valve disease.

Authors:  Tomislav Mihaljevic; Marijan Koprivanac; Marta Kelava; Avi Goodman; Craig Jarrett; Sarah J Williams; A Marc Gillinov; Gurjyot Bajwa; Stephanie L Mick; Johannes Bonatti; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  The Expanding Role of Endoscopic Robotics in Mitral Valve Surgery: 1,257 Consecutive Procedures.

Authors:  Douglas A Murphy; Emmanuel Moss; Jose Binongo; Jeffrey S Miller; Steven K Macheers; Eric L Sarin; Alexander M Herzog; Vinod H Thourani; Robert A Guyton; Michael E Halkos
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Minithoracotomy for mitral valve repair improves inpatient and postdischarge economic savings.

Authors:  Eugene A Grossi; Scott Goldman; J Alan Wolfe; John Mehall; J Michael Smith; Gorav Ailawadi; Arash Salemi; Matt Moore; Alison Ward; Candace Gunnarsson
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Minimally invasive versus conventional open mitral valve surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Davy C H Cheng; Janet Martin; Avtar Lal; Anno Diegeler; Thierry A Folliguet; L Wiley Nifong; Patrick Perier; Ehud Raanani; J Michael Smith; Joerg Seeburger; Volkmar Falk
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2011-03

9.  Does robotic technology make minimally invasive cardiac surgery too expensive? A hospital cost analysis of robotic and conventional techniques.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Morgan; Barbara A Thornton; Joy C Peacock; Karen W Hollingsworth; Craig R Smith; Mehmet C Oz; Michael Argenziano
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.620

10.  A contemporary cost analysis of postoperative morbidity after coronary artery bypass grafting with and without concomitant aortic valve replacement to improve patient quality and cost-effective care.

Authors:  Damien J LaPar; Ivan K Crosby; Jeffrey B Rich; Edwin Fonner; Irving L Kron; Gorav Ailawadi; Alan M Speir
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  3 in total

1.  A propensity matched analysis of robotic, minimally invasive, and conventional mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Robert B Hawkins; J Hunter Mehaffey; Matthew G Mullen; Wiley L Nifong; W Randolph Chitwood; Marc R Katz; Mohammed A Quader; Andy C Kiser; Alan M Speir; Gorav Ailawadi
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Robotic mitral valve surgery: a review and tips for safely negotiating the learning curve.

Authors:  Caroline Toolan; Kenneth Palmer; Omar Al-Rawi; Tim Ridgway; Paul Modi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Sirtuins and Sepsis: Cross Talk between Redox and Epigenetic Pathways.

Authors:  Anugraha Gandhirajan; Sanjoy Roychowdhury; Vidula Vachharajani
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.