| Literature DB >> 28203276 |
Zhaoyang Yuan1, Yangbing Wen2, Nuwan Sella Kapu1, Rodger Beatson1,3, D Mark Martinez1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bamboo is a highly abundant source of biomass which is underutilized despite having a chemical composition and fiber structure similar as wood. The main challenge for the industrial processing of bamboo is the high level of silica, which forms water-insoluble precipitates negetively affecting the process systems. A cost-competitive and eco-friendly scheme for the production of high-purity dissolving grade pulp from bamboo not only requires a process for silica removal, but also needs to fully utilize all of the materials dissolved in the process which includes lignin, and cellulosic and hemicellulosic sugars as well as the silica. Many investigations have been carried out to resolve the silica issue, but none of them has led to a commercial process. In this work, alkaline pretreatment of bamboo was conducted to extract silica prior to pulping process. The silica-free substrate was used to produce high-grade dissolving pulp. The dissolved silica, lignin, hemicellulosic sugars, and degraded cellulose in the spent liquors obtained from alkaline pretreatment and pulping process were recovered for providing high-value bio-based chemicals and fuel.Entities:
Keywords: Alkaline pretreatment; Bamboo; Bioethanol; Dissolving pulp; Lignin; Silica
Year: 2017 PMID: 28203276 PMCID: PMC5303214 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-017-0723-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
The D-E-D bleaching conditions
| Conditions | D1 | E | D2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consistency (%) | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Temperature (°C) | 70 | 80 | 80 |
| Time (min) | 90 | 60 | 160 |
| ClO2 as Cl2 (% of dry weight pulp) | 1.5 | – | 0.5 |
| NaOH (% of dry weight pulp) | – | 1.2 | – |
| Final pH | 2.2 | 10.8 | 4.2 |
Chemical composition of bamboo chips after alkaline pretreatment
| Alkali | Solid yield (%) | Composition (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silica | Cellulose | Hemicellulose | Lignin | ||
| Untreated | NA | 1.12 ± 0.01 | 47.3 ± 0.32 | 21.8 ± 0.27 | 25.3 ± 0.63 |
| NaOH | 87.2 ± 0.6 | 0.012 ± 0.01 | 51.86 ± 0.36 | 17.60 ± 0.44 | 27.97 ± 0.56 |
| KOH | 86.1 ± 1.9 | 0.013 ± 0.01 | 52.24 ± 0.41 | 18.03 ± 0.28 | 28.03 ± 0.78 |
| Ca(OH)2 | 90.4 ± 1.6 | 1.14 ± 0.03 | 50.80 ± 0.35 | 20.67 ± 0.46 | 27.09 ± 0.49 |
| NH4OH | 90.9 ± 1.7 | 0.83 ± 0.04 | 50.42 ± 0.54 | 20.82 ± 0.39 | 27.22 ± 0.71 |
Treatments were carried out at 90 °C with alkali loading of 3.0 mmol/g o.d. bamboo biomass
All data are shown as mean ± SD
NA not applicable, NaOH sodium hydroxide, KOH potassium hydroxide, Ca(OH) calcium hydroxide, NH OH ammonia
Fig. 1Effect of EA and sulfidity on the kappa number bamboo kraft pulps. a 160 °C; b 170 °C
Effect of EA and sulfidity on yield, chemical composition of kraft pulps from pretreated bamboo chips
| Alkaline-pretreated samples | EA (%) | Sulfidity (%) | Total yielda,c (%) | Rejectsa,c (%) | Celluloseb,c (%) | Hemicelluloseb,c (%) | Ligninb,c (%) | Ashb,c (%) | Silica in pulpb,c (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooking at 160 °C | 18 | 0 | 51.8 | 0.2 | 80.26 ± 0.35 | 14.58 ± 0.14 | 3.56 ± 0.13 | 0.14 ± 0.01 | ≈0.01 |
| 10 | 50.6 | 0.1 | 83.28 ± 0.35 | 13.94 ± 0.32 | 2.90 ± 0.12 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | ND | ||
| 25 | 49.3 | ND | 84.30 ± 0.46 | 13.85 ± 0.41 | 2.47 ± 0.08 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | ND | ||
| 40 | 48.6 | ND | 85.02 ± 0.43 | 13.42 ± 0.25 | 2.07 ± 0.11 | 0.11 ± 0.02 | ≈0.01 | ||
| 20 | 0 | 51.6 | 0.2 | 81.64 ± 0.35 | 13.92 ± 0.25 | 3.34 ± 0.11 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | ND | |
| 10 | 49.5 | 0.1 | 84.79 ± 0.38 | 12.53 ± 0.18 | 2.78 ± 0.09 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | ND | ||
| 25 | 48.2 | ND | 86.06 ± 0.49 | 11.99 ± 0.24 | 2.14 ± 0.06 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | ≈0.01 | ||
| 40 | 47.4 | ND | 86.74 ± 0.67 | 11.65 ± 0.19 | 1.93 ± 0.08 | 0.13 ± 0.02 | ND | ||
| 22 | 0 | 50.3 | 0.1 | 83.26 ± 0.36 | 12.36 ± 0.26 | 3.26 ± 0.09 | 0.14 ± 0.35 | ND | |
| 10 | 47.7 | ND | 86.78 ± 0.54 | 10.65 ± 0.22 | 2.57 ± 0.12 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | ≈0.01 | ||
| 25 | 45.5 | ND | 88.44 ± 0.53 | 10.21 ± 0.16 | 2.03 ± 0.09 | 0.14 ± 0.01 | ND | ||
| 40 | 45.0 | ND | 89.66 ± 0.26 | 9.73 ± 0.25 | 1.83 ± 0.13 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | ND | ||
| Cooking at 170 °C | 18 | 0 | 48.9 | 0.2 | 81.73 ± 0.25 | 15.11 ± 0.32 | 3.28 ± 0.10 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | ND |
| 10 | 46.8 | ND | 84.05 ± 0.36 | 13.87 ± 0.24 | 2.67 ± 0.06 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | ND | ||
| 25 | 45.6 | ND | 84.78 ± 0.32 | 13.23 ± 0.14 | 2.13 ± 0.11 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | ≈0.01 | ||
| 40 | 44.8 | ND | 85.63 ± 0.44 | 12.86 ± 0.17 | 1.98 ± 0.08 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | ND | ||
| 20 | 0 | 47.8 | 0.1 | 83.29 ± 0.45 | 13.26 ± 0.23 | 3.19 ± 0.11 | 0.13 ± 0.02 | ≈0.01 | |
| 10 | 45.0 | ND | 86.18 ± 0.22 | 11.78 ± 0.20 | 2.45 ± 0.13 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | ND | ||
| 25 | 42.3 | ND | 87.04 ± 0.49 | 10.99 ± 0.13 | 1.65 ± 0.06 | 0.14 ± 0.02 | ≈0.01 | ||
| 40 | 41.6 | ND | 87.75 ± 0.19 | 10.72 ± 0.26 | 1.52 ± 0.06 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | ND | ||
| 22 | 0 | 46.4 | ND | 84.52 ± 0.45 | 11.13 ± 0.25 | 3.06 ± 0.12 | 0.14 ± 0.01 | ≈0.01 | |
| 10 | 42.7 | ND | 88.08 ± 0.38 | 9.67 ± 0.23 | 2.25 ± 0.08 | 0.11 ± 0.02 | ND | ||
| 25 | 40.2 | ND | 89.13 ± 0.26 | 9.04 ± 0.25 | 1.50 ± 0.05 | 0.09 ± 0.02 | ND | ||
| 40 | 39.1 | ND | 89.82 ± 0.21 | 8.76 ± 0.22 | 1.38 ± 0.07 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | ND |
All the data are shown as mean ± SD
ND not detected
aCalculations were based on original oven-dried chip mass
bCalculations were based on oven-dried pretreatment-kraft pulp mass
cValues are expressed as averages of two replicate experiments
Fig. 2Comparison of hemicellulose content of pulps from different treatments. a Xylanase treatment at temperature 60 °C, pH 6, and 10% pulp consistency; b CCE at temperature 30 °C and 10% pulp consistency for 45 min
Fig. 3Hemicellulose content of pulps from the sequential treatment process of xylanase and CCE. Xylanase treatment: temperature 60 °C, pH 6, pulp consistency 10%; CCE process: temperature 30 °C, time 45 min, pulp consistency 10%. 4–12% means the used NaOH concentration during CCE process
Yield, hemicellulose content, α-cellulose, ash content, brightness, reactivity, and viscosity of bleached (D-E-D) bamboo dissolving pulp
| Sample | Yielda (%) | Hemicelluloseb (%) | α-celluloseb (%) | Ashb (%) | Brightness (% ISO) | Viscosity (mPa s) | Fock reactivity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 36.2 | 7.49 ± 0.12 | 92.06 ± 0.03 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 85.6 ± 0.1 | 6.94 ± 0.04 | 22.3 ± 0.78 |
| Xylanasec and 4% CCE | 33.8 | 3.87 ± 0.11 | 95.72 ± 0.06 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 86.2 ± 0.1 | 6.45 ± 0.02 | 32.6 ± 0.24 |
| Xylanasec and 6% CCE | 32.6 | 2.45 ± 0.06 | 97.18 ± 0.13 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 86.7 ± 0.1 | 6.39 ± 0.02 | 43.4 ± 0.45 |
| Xylanasec and 8% CCE | 31.4 | 1.58 ± 0.10 | 97.82 ± 0.10 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 87.6 ± 0.1 | 6.24 ± 0.01 | 23.4 ± 0.58 |
| Xylanased and 4% CCE | 32.0 | 2.67 ± 0.08 | 96.98 ± 0.15 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 86.9 ± 0.1 | 6.38 ± 0.02 | 34.6 ± 0.62 |
| Xylanased and 6% CCE | 31.8 | 1.36 ± 0.05 | 97.84 ± 0.11 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 87.8 ± 0.1 | 6.25 ± 0.01 | 44.7 ± 0.25 |
| Xylanased and 8% CCE | 30.2 | 1.14 ± 0.07 | 98.06 ± 0.05 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 88.3 ± 0.1 | 6.12 ± 0.02 | 22.1 ± 0.93 |
4–8% CCE means the NaOH concentration used for cold caustic extraction
Control the pulp was treated as the same operations used for xylanase treatment without using xylanase and NaOH
aCalculations were based on original oven-dried chip mass
bCalculations were based on oven-dried corresponding pulp mass
cPulp was treated with xylanase 4 U/g o.d. pulp at 60 °C and pH 6 for 6 h
dPulp was treated with xylanase 8 U/g o.d. pulp at 60 °C and pH 6 for 6 h
Recovery of silica, lignin, and carbohydrates from the two liquors of bamboo processing
| Sample | Solid content (%) | Chemical composition (%)a | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ash (without silica) | Silica | Glucan | Xylan | Galactan | Arabinan | Lignin | Phenolic | Others | ||
| APEL | 5.81 ± 0.06 | 47.71 ± 0.12 | 4.56 ± 0.10 | 7.47 ± 0.04 | 24.14 ± 0.23 | 0.82 ± 0.03 | 0.94 ± 0.23 | 3.77 ± 0.16 | ≈0.13 | 10.28 ± 0.11 |
| BL | 17.36 ± 0.04 | 34.32 ± 0.14 | ND | 12.85 ± 0.48 | 15.48 ± 0.47 | 0.46 ± 0.05 | 0.58 ± 0.04 | 30.22 ± 0.36 | 3.75 ± 0.11 | 3.23 ± 0.13 |
All data are shown as mean ± SD
ND not detected, NA not applicable, APEL alkaline pre-extraction liquor, BL black liquor, others includes acetyl and uronic acids groups, extractives
aValues were expressed as the percentage of the total dry solids
bCalculations were based on original oven-dried chip mass
Chemical composition of the sugar mixture before and after enzymatic hydrolysis
| Enzyme loading | Composition (g/L) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xylose | Glucose | Arabinose | Galactose | Gluco-oligomers | Xylo-oligomers | Furfural | |
| Overliming–detoxification | 15.74 ± 0.26 | 10.32 ± 0.23 | 0.37 ± 0.05 | 0.51 ± 0.04 | 25.69 ± 0.45 | 16.87 ± 0.65 | 0 |
| 1 mg/g | 39.72 ± 0.34 | 26.13 ± 0.14 | 0.36 ± 0.07 | 0.53 ± 0.11 | 1.62 ± 0.14 | 1.05 ± 0.05 | 0 |
| 3 mg/g | 39.81 ± 0.41 | 26.22 ± 0.15 | 0.38 ± 0.11 | 0.52 ± 0.15 | 1.48 ± 0.23 | 0.92 ± 0.08 | 0 |
| 10 mg/g | 40.01 ± 0.35 | 26.38 ± 0.11 | 0.37 ± 0.06 | 0.49 ± 0.09 | 1.39 ± 0.14 | 0.76 ± 0.09 | 0 |
All data are shown as mean ± SD
Fig. 4Fermentation performance of using the Saccharomyces cerevisiae BFIS strain. a Recovered sugar hydrolysate from bamboo processing; b a standard sugar mixture. Fermentation was initiated with a high cell density (initial strain cell = 1.0 g/L) at 30 °C, pH 5.0, and 150 rpm under anaerobic conditions. Each experiment was performed in triplicate, and the error bars indicate the standard deviation of the mean of triplicate values
Fig. 5Mass balance for the overall process for the production of dissolving pulp, ethanol, silica, and lignin from bamboo chips. EA effective alkali, CCE cold caustic extraction, CO carbon dioxide, H SO sulfuric acid