Literature DB >> 2820289

Superiority of alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy in extensive small cell lung cancer. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial by the National Cancer Institute of Canada.

W K Evans, R Feld, N Murray, A Willan, P Coy, D Osoba, F A Shepherd, D A Clark, M Levitt, A MacDonald.   

Abstract

The National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group conducted a prospective randomized study comparing standard chemotherapy with alternating chemotherapy in patients with extensive small cell lung cancer. "Standard" treatment consisted of cyclophosphamide (1000 mg/m2 body surface area); doxorubicin (50 mg/m2), and vincristine (2 mg) every 3 weeks for six courses. Alternating chemotherapy was cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine alternating with etoposide (100 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3) every 3 weeks for six treatment cycles. Two hundred eighty-nine patients were eligible and evaluable for response to therapy and survival. Best response was higher in patients on alternating chemotherapy (complete plus partial response, 80% compared with 63.2%; p less than 0.002). Progression-free survival for patients on alternating chemotherapy was superior (p less than 0.0001) as was overall survival (p = 0.03). Major toxicities were equally frequent in both treatment groups. These results show a modest superiority of alternating chemotherapy over standard therapy in extensive small cell lung cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2820289     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-107-4-451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  26 in total

1.  Sequential chemotherapy in good-prognosis patients with small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  C J Twelves; J Goldman; C M Ash; R L Souhami; P G Harper; S G Spiro; D Geddes; J S Tobias
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Does the substitution of cisplatin in a standard four drug regimen improve survival in small cell carcinoma of the lung? A comparison of two chemotherapy regimens.

Authors:  A P Smith; G Anderson; G Chappell; D R Bowen
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Treatment of small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  C W Taylor
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1989-11

Review 4.  Etoposide. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in combination chemotherapy of cancer.

Authors:  J M Henwood; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Lung cancer in the 1990s.

Authors:  N Murray
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 6.  Chemotherapy in lung cancer.

Authors:  C G Price; M L Slevin
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 7.  Strategies to avoid treatment-induced lineage crisis in advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Guilhem Roubaud; Bobby C Liaw; William K Oh; David J Mulholland
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Multitrial Evaluation of Progression-Free Survival as a Surrogate End Point for Overall Survival in First-Line Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Nathan R Foster; Lindsay A Renfro; Steven E Schild; Mary W Redman; Xiaofei F Wang; Suzanne E Dahlberg; Keyue Ding; Penelope A Bradbury; Suresh S Ramalingam; David R Gandara; Taro Shibata; Nagahiro Saijo; Everett E Vokes; Alex A Adjei; Sumithra J Mandrekar
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 9.  Modern management of small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Roberta Ferraldeschi; Sofia Baka; Babita Jyoti; Corinne Faivre-Finn; Nick Thatcher; Paul Lorigan
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  Lung cancer: a review of current therapeutic modalities.

Authors:  A B Sandler; A C Buzaid
Journal:  Lung       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.