Literature DB >> 28202206

Retrospective Chart Analysis of Concussion Discharge Instructions in the Emergency Department.

Allison D Lane1, Matthew R Berkman1, David Verbunker1, Taylor Shekell1, Michael Bouska1, Lauren Barnett1, Allie Keogh1, Tomas Nuno1, Uwe Stolz1, Anna L Waterbrook1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recognition and diagnosis of concussion is increasing, but current research shows these patients are discharged from the emergency department (ED) with a wide variability of recommendations and instructions.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the adequacy of documentation of discharge instructions given to patients discharged from the ED with concussions.
METHODS: This was a quality-improvement study conducted at a University-based Level I trauma center. A chart review was performed on all patients discharged with closed head injury or concussion over a 1-year period. Chi-squared measures of association and Fisher's exact test were used to compare the proportion of patients receiving discharge instructions (printed or documented in the chart as discussed by the physician). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between whether the concussion was sport-related in relation to our primary outcomes.
RESULTS: There were 1855 charts that met inclusion criteria. The physician documented discussion of concussion discharge instructions in 41% (95% confidence interval [CI] 39.2-43.7) and printed instructions were given in 71% (95% CI 69.1-73.2). Physicians documented discussion of instructions more often for sport-related vs. non-sport-related concussion (58% vs. 39%, p = 0.008) with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.1 (95% CI 1.6-2.8). Discharge instructions were given more often for sport-related injuries than those without sport-related injuries (85% vs. 69%, p = 0.047), with an OR of 2.2 (95% CI 1.6-3.1). Children were more likely to have had physician-documented discussion of instructions (56%, 95% CI 52.3-59.1 vs. 31%, 95% CI 28.0-33.6), printed discharge instructions (86%, 95% CI 83.2-88.1 vs. 61%, 95% CI 57.6-63.4), and return-to-play precautions given (11.2%, 95% CI 9.2-13.6 vs. 4.5%, 95% CI 3.4-5.9) compared with adults.
CONCLUSIONS: Documentation of discharge instructions given to ED patients with concussions was inadequate, overall.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  closed head injury; concussion; sports medicine

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28202206     DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.12.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0736-4679            Impact factor:   1.484


  3 in total

1.  Improving Discharge Instructions Following a Concussion Diagnosis in the Pediatric Emergency Department: A Pre-post Intervention Study.

Authors:  Aaron M Yengo-Kahn; Natalie Hibshman; Michael Bezzerides; Michael J Feldman; Adam A Vukovic; Nishit Mummareddy; Shilin Zhao; Cody H Penrod; Christopher M Bonfield; E Haley Vance
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2021-08-26

2.  Do healthcare providers assess for risk factors and talk to patients about return to driving after a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI)? Findings from the 2020 DocStyles Survey.

Authors:  Kelly Sarmiento; Dana Waltzman; David Wright
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.770

3.  Concussion in Women's Flat-Track Roller Derby.

Authors:  Melissa D Stockbridge; Zafer Keser; Rochelle S Newman
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 4.003

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.