| Literature DB >> 28199991 |
Luigi Gianturco1, Bruno Bodini2, Vincenzo Gianturco3, Giuseppina Lippo4, Agnese Solbiati1, Maurizio Turiel1.
Abstract
Along the years, the analysis of soccer referees perfomance has interested the experts and we can find several types of studies in literature using in particular cardiac imaging. The aim of this retrospective study was to observe relationship between VO2max uptake and some conventional and not-conventional echocardiographic parameters. In order to perform this evaluation, we have enrolled 20 referees, belonging to Italian Soccer Referees' Association and we have investigated cardiovascular profile of them. We found a strong direct relationship between VO2max and global longitudinal strain of left ventricle assessed by means of speckle tracking echocardiographic analysis (R2=0.8464). The most common classic echocardiographic indexes have showed mild relations (respectively, VO2max vs EF: R2=0.4444; VO2max vs LV indexed mass: R2=0.2268). Therefore, our study suggests that longitudinal strain could be proposed as a specific echocardiographic parameter to evaluate the soccer referees performance.Entities:
Keywords: LV mechanics; VO2max; myocardial function; soccer refereeing; speckle tracking echocardiography
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28199991 PMCID: PMC5503651 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.15242
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Basal characteristics of population
| Parameters | Means (±SD) |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 33.87 (9.56) |
| Height (m) | 1.86 (0.05) |
| Weight (Kg) | 77.20 (4.37) |
| BMI (Kg*m−2) | 22.40 (0.80) |
| SBP (mmHg) | 124.33 (9.80) |
| DBP (mmHg) | 76.00 (6.04) |
| HR (beats*min−1) | 61.93 (3.84) |
| VO2max (ml*kg−1*min−1) | 50.39 (0.70) |
| Number of training sessions/year | 196.55 (7.10) |
Data are presented as means (±SD). BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HR, heart rate; VO2max = maximal oxygen uptake.
Echocardiographic parameters
| Parameters | Means (±SD) |
|---|---|
| LVEDD (mm) | 52.95 (2.04) |
| LVESD (mm) | 33.35 (2.25) |
| LVEDV (ml) | 115.80 (2.69) |
| LVESV (ml) | 40.55 (3.94) |
| EF (%) | 64.97 (4.88) |
| LV indexed mass (g*m−2) | 109.75 (5.99) |
| GLS (%) | 23.34 (3.73) |
Data are presented as means (±SD). LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVESD, left ventricular end-systolic diameter; LVEDV, left ventricular end-diastolic volume; LVESV, left ventricular end-systolic volume; EF, ejection fraction; LV indexed mass, left ventricle indexed mass; GLS, global longitudinal strain, expressed as usual as negative value.
ANOVA Kruskal-Wallis one way analysis
| ANOVA Kruskal-Wallis one way test | |
|---|---|
| Parameters | |
| LVEDD (mm) | NS |
| LVESD (mm) | NS |
| LVEDV (ml) | .05 |
| LVESV (ml) | .05 |
| EF (%) | .03 |
| GLS (%) | .002 |
| Number of training sessions/year | NS |
| LV indexed mass (g*m−2) | .04 |
P values are shown. NS=not significative. LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVESD, left ventricular end-systolic diameter; LVEDV, left ventricular end-diastolic volume; LVESV, left ventricular end-systolic volume; EF, ejection fraction; GLS, global longitudinal strain, expressed as usual as negative value; LV indexed mass, left ventricle indexed mass.
Figure 1Correlation between VO2max and GLS
Figure 2Correlation between VO2max and LV indexed mass