| Literature DB >> 28198813 |
Daniel Geisler1,2, Franziska Ritschel1,2, Joseph A King1,2, Fabio Bernardoni1,2, Maria Seidel1,2, Ilka Boehm1,2, Franziska Runge1,2, Thomas Goschke3, Veit Roessner2, Michael N Smolka4, Stefan Ehrlich1,2.
Abstract
Patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) are characterised by increased self-control, cognitive rigidity and impairments in set-shifting, but the underlying neural mechanisms are poorly understood. Here we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to elucidate the neural correlates of behavioural adaptation to changes in reward contingencies in young acutely ill AN patients. Thirty-six adolescent/young adult, non-chronic female AN patients and 36 age-matched healthy females completed a well-established probabilistic reversal learning task during fMRI. We analysed hemodynamic responses in empirically-defined regions of interest during positive feedback and negative feedback not followed/followed by behavioural adaptation and conducted functional connectivity analyses. Although overall task performance was comparable between groups, AN showed increased shifting after receiving negative feedback (lose-shift behaviour) and altered dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) responses as a function of feedback. Specifically, patients had increased dACC responses (which correlated with perfectionism) and task-related coupling with amygdala preceding behavioural adaption. Given the generally preserved task performance in young AN, elevated dACC responses specifically during behavioural adaption is suggestive of increased monitoring for the need to adjust performance strategies. Higher dACC-amygdala coupling and increased adaptation after negative feedback underlines this interpretation and could be related to intolerance of uncertainty which has been suggested for AN.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28198813 PMCID: PMC5304157 DOI: 10.1038/srep42066
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Group characteristics.
| AN | HC | | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test statistics | ||||||
| Age | 16.0 | 2.6 | 16.3 | 2.6 | −0.5 | 0.662 |
| BMI | 14.7 | 1.3 | 20.4 | 2.5 | −12.0 | <0.001 |
| BMI SDS | −2.1 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.8 | −11.7 | <0.001 |
| Minimal lifetime BMI | 14.4 | 1.3 | 19.8 | 2.4 | −11.7 | <0.001 |
| IQ | 111.9 | 11.1 | 110.9 | 10.0 | 0.4 | 0.673 |
| Handedness | 0.5 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 3.7 | −1.8 | 0.081 |
| EDI-2 total score | 197.4 | 50.7 | 139.6 | 28.0 | 5.9 | <0.001 |
| EDI-2 perfectionism | 19.6 | 6.0 | 15.7 | 4.2 | 3.3 | 0.002 |
| BDI-II total score | 19.5 | 11.6 | 5.5 | 5.7 | 6.5 | <0.001 |
| Total win [€] | 5.0 | 1.8 | 5.2 | 2.5 | 0.2 | 0.655 |
| Persistence | 2.0 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 0.190 |
| Lose-shift | 30.3 | 6.6 | 27.0 | 7.4 | 4.6 | 0.035 |
| Win-shift | 5.9 | 5.5 | 6.3 | 5.3 | 0.1 | 0.780 |
| Contingency reversal | 9.0 | 1.8 | 8.8 | 1.9 | 0.3 | 0.561 |
Comparisons of demographic and clinical variables were examined using independent two-sample t-tests, differences in task relevant variables were examined using one-way ANCOVAs controlling for IQ. Means and standard deviations (SD) are given.
AN = anorexia nervosa patients; HC = healthy controls; BMI-SDS = body mass index standard deviation score; IQ = intelligence quotient; EDI-2 = Eating disorder inventory; BDI-II = Beck Depression Inventory; lose-shift = negative feedback that incurred a change in behaviour; win-shift = positive feedback that incurred a change in behaviour; P-values below 0.05 indicates a significant group difference; For more details on additional task performance measures see SI Table 2.1.
Figure 1Group-Feedback interaction.
Left: Brain map depicting the interaction effect with peak at x = −11, y = 6, z = 36 [F(2,140) = 9.5, pFWE-SVC <0.001]. ACC ROI is highlighted in light grey. Right: Extracted beta values of the dACC cluster region across groups and feedback-condition depicted as a bar chart (means with 95% CI).
Figure 2gPPI results.
Statistical maps (whole-brain analysis, p < 0.001 uncorrected, cluster extent k> = 30) showing regions of group differences in functional connectivity across task conditions (warm colours). Global peak at x = 25, y = −10, z = −8 [F(2,140) = 9.9, p < 0.001]. Seventy-seven percent of the cluster overlaps with the right centromedial amygdala (coloured in green) defined by the Jülich probabilistic atlas104.
Figure 3Experimental design.
First, two abstract stimuli are presented for up to 2 s. After the participant selected one stimulus by left or right button press a fixation cross was presented for 4 s. Finally, positive or negative feedback (monetary reward or loss) was displayed for 1 s followed by a jittered inter-trial interval (fixation cross) for 4 to 8 s.