Masaki Kato1,2, Susumu Hamada-Tsutsumi3, Chiaki Okuse4, Aiko Sakai5, Nobuyuki Matsumoto2, Masaaki Sato6, Toshiyuki Sato6, Mitsumi Arito6, Kazuki Omoteyama6, Naoya Suematsu6, Kazuki Okamoto6, Takanobu Kato7, Fumio Itoh2, Ryo Sumazaki5, Yasuhito Tanaka3, Hiroshi Yotsuyanagi8, Tomohiro Kato6, Manae Suzuki Kurokawa9. 1. Disease Biomarker Analysis and Molecular Regulation, St. Marianna University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-16-1, Sugao, Miyamae-Ku, Kawasaki, 216-8511, Japan. 2. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan. 3. Department of Virology and Liver Unit, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan. 4. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan. 5. Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan. 6. Clinical Proteomics and Molecular Medicine, St. Marianna University Graduate School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan. 7. Department of Virology II, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan. 8. Department of Infectious Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 9. Disease Biomarker Analysis and Molecular Regulation, St. Marianna University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-16-1, Sugao, Miyamae-Ku, Kawasaki, 216-8511, Japan. manae@marianna-u.ac.jp.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In universal hepatitis B (HB) vaccination, single vaccine-derived polyclonal anti-HBs antibodies (anti-HBs) need to inhibit infection of HB viruses (HBV) of non-vaccine genotypes. We experimentally addressed this issue. METHODS: Anti-HBs-positive sera were obtained by vaccination with genotype A- or C-derived HBs antigen (HBsAg, gtA-sera or gtC-sera). Their reactivity to genotype A- and C-derived HBsAg (gtA-Ag and gtC-Ag) was measured by ELISA. The capacity of sera to neutralize HBV was evaluated using an in vitro infection model. RESULTS: Of 135 anti-gtA-Ag-reactive gtA-sera, 134 (99.3%) were anti-gtC-Ag-reactive. All (100%) 120 anti-gtC-Ag-reactive gtC-sera were anti-gtA-Ag-reactive. The reactivity to gtA-Ag was strongly correlated with that to gtC-Ag (gtA-sera, ρ = 0.989; gtC-sera, ρ = 0.953; p < 0.01). In gtA-sera (n = 10), anti-HBs to gtA-Ag were less completely absorbed with gtC-Ag (96.4%) than with gtA-Ag (100%, p < 0.05). Similarly, in gtC-sera (n = 10), anti-HBs to gtC-Ag were less completely absorbed with gtA-Ag (96.0%) than with gtC-Ag (100%, p < 0.01). Thus, 3.6 and 4.0% of anti-HBs in gtA-sera and gtC-sera were vaccine genotype HBsAg-specific, respectively. In the neutralization test, gtA-sera (n = 4) and gtC-sera (n = 3) with anti-HBs titers adjusted to 100 mIU/mL equally inhibited genotype C HBV infection (92.8 vs. 95.4%, p = 0.44). However, at 30 mIU/mL, the gtA-sera less effectively inhibited infection than the gtC-sera (60.2 vs. 90.2%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination with genotype A- or C-derived HBsAg provided polyclonal anti-HBs that sufficiently bound to non-vaccine genotype HBsAg. However, a small portion of anti-HBs were specific to the vaccine genotype HBsAg. High anti-HBs titers would be required to prevent HBV infection of non-vaccine genotypes. UMIN/CTR UMIN000014363.
BACKGROUND: In universal hepatitis B (HB) vaccination, single vaccine-derived polyclonal anti-HBs antibodies (anti-HBs) need to inhibit infection of HB viruses (HBV) of non-vaccine genotypes. We experimentally addressed this issue. METHODS: Anti-HBs-positive sera were obtained by vaccination with genotype A- or C-derived HBs antigen (HBsAg, gtA-sera or gtC-sera). Their reactivity to genotype A- and C-derived HBsAg (gtA-Ag and gtC-Ag) was measured by ELISA. The capacity of sera to neutralize HBV was evaluated using an in vitro infection model. RESULTS: Of 135 anti-gtA-Ag-reactive gtA-sera, 134 (99.3%) were anti-gtC-Ag-reactive. All (100%) 120 anti-gtC-Ag-reactive gtC-sera were anti-gtA-Ag-reactive. The reactivity to gtA-Ag was strongly correlated with that to gtC-Ag (gtA-sera, ρ = 0.989; gtC-sera, ρ = 0.953; p < 0.01). In gtA-sera (n = 10), anti-HBs to gtA-Ag were less completely absorbed with gtC-Ag (96.4%) than with gtA-Ag (100%, p < 0.05). Similarly, in gtC-sera (n = 10), anti-HBs to gtC-Ag were less completely absorbed with gtA-Ag (96.0%) than with gtC-Ag (100%, p < 0.01). Thus, 3.6 and 4.0% of anti-HBs in gtA-sera and gtC-sera were vaccine genotype HBsAg-specific, respectively. In the neutralization test, gtA-sera (n = 4) and gtC-sera (n = 3) with anti-HBs titers adjusted to 100 mIU/mL equally inhibited genotype C HBV infection (92.8 vs. 95.4%, p = 0.44). However, at 30 mIU/mL, the gtA-sera less effectively inhibited infection than the gtC-sera (60.2 vs. 90.2%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination with genotype A- or C-derived HBsAg provided polyclonal anti-HBs that sufficiently bound to non-vaccine genotype HBsAg. However, a small portion of anti-HBs were specific to the vaccine genotype HBsAg. High anti-HBs titers would be required to prevent HBV infection of non-vaccine genotypes. UMIN/CTR UMIN000014363.
Entities:
Keywords:
Genotypes; Hepatitis B virus; Polyclonal anti-HBs antibodies; Universal vaccination