Literature DB >> 28197643

Machine Learning Principles Can Improve Hip Fracture Prediction.

Christian Kruse1,2,3, Pia Eiken4,5, Peter Vestergaard6,7.   

Abstract

Apply machine learning principles to predict hip fractures and estimate predictor importance in Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-scanned men and women. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data from two Danish regions between 1996 and 2006 were combined with national Danish patient data to comprise 4722 women and 717 men with 5 years of follow-up time (original cohort n = 6606 men and women). Twenty-four statistical models were built on 75% of data points through k-5, 5-repeat cross-validation, and then validated on the remaining 25% of data points to calculate area under the curve (AUC) and calibrate probability estimates. The best models were retrained with restricted predictor subsets to estimate the best subsets. For women, bootstrap aggregated flexible discriminant analysis ("bagFDA") performed best with a test AUC of 0.92 [0.89; 0.94] and well-calibrated probabilities following Naïve Bayes adjustments. A "bagFDA" model limited to 11 predictors (among them bone mineral densities (BMD), biochemical glucose measurements, general practitioner and dentist use) achieved a test AUC of 0.91 [0.88; 0.93]. For men, eXtreme Gradient Boosting ("xgbTree") performed best with a test AUC of 0.89 [0.82; 0.95], but with poor calibration in higher probabilities. A ten predictor subset (BMD, biochemical cholesterol and liver function tests, penicillin use and osteoarthritis diagnoses) achieved a test AUC of 0.86 [0.78; 0.94] using an "xgbTree" model. Machine learning can improve hip fracture prediction beyond logistic regression using ensemble models. Compiling data from international cohorts of longer follow-up and performing similar machine learning procedures has the potential to further improve discrimination and calibration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FRAX; Fracture; Machine learning; Osteoporosis; Prediction

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28197643     DOI: 10.1007/s00223-017-0238-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  19 in total

1.  Comparing three machine learning approaches to design a risk assessment tool for future fractures: predicting a subsequent major osteoporotic fracture in fracture patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis.

Authors:  B C S de Vries; J H Hegeman; W Nijmeijer; J Geerdink; C Seifert; C G M Groothuis-Oudshoorn
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Artificial Intelligence and Orthopaedics: An Introduction for Clinicians.

Authors:  Thomas G Myers; Prem N Ramkumar; Benjamin F Ricciardi; Kenneth L Urish; Jens Kipper; Constantinos Ketonis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  Artificial intelligence, osteoporosis and fragility fractures.

Authors:  Uran Ferizi; Stephen Honig; Gregory Chang
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  Machine Learning Approaches for Fracture Risk Assessment: A Comparative Analysis of Genomic and Phenotypic Data in 5130 Older Men.

Authors:  Qing Wu; Fatma Nasoz; Jongyun Jung; Bibek Bhattarai; Mira V Han
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 5.  [Artificial intelligence and novel approaches for treatment of non-union in bone : From established standard methods in medicine up to novel fields of research].

Authors:  Marie K Reumann; Benedikt J Braun; Maximilian M Menger; Fabian Springer; Johann Jazewitsch; Tobias Schwarz; Andreas Nüssler; Tina Histing; Mika F R Rollmann
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-07-09

Review 6.  Prediction Models for Osteoporotic Fractures Risk: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.

Authors:  Xuemei Sun; Yancong Chen; Yinyan Gao; Zixuan Zhang; Lang Qin; Jinlu Song; Huan Wang; Irene Xy Wu
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 9.968

7.  Implementation of a machine learning application in preoperative risk assessment for hip repair surgery.

Authors:  Yu-Yu Li; Jhi-Joung Wang; Sheng-Han Huang; Chi-Lin Kuo; Jen-Yin Chen; Chung-Feng Liu; Chin-Chen Chu
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 2.376

8.  Reverse engineering the FRAX algorithm: Clinical insights and systematic analysis of fracture risk.

Authors:  Jules D Allbritton-King; Julia K Elrod; Philip S Rosenberg; Timothy Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 4.626

9.  Artificial Intelligence Applied to Osteoporosis: A Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting Fragility Fractures From MRI Data.

Authors:  Uran Ferizi; Harrison Besser; Pirro Hysi; Joseph Jacobs; Chamith S Rajapakse; Cheng Chen; Punam K Saha; Stephen Honig; Gregory Chang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  What Is the Accuracy of Three Different Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Clinical Outcomes After Shoulder Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Vikas Kumar; Christopher Roche; Steven Overman; Ryan Simovitch; Pierre-Henri Flurin; Thomas Wright; Joseph Zuckerman; Howard Routman; Ankur Teredesai
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.755

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.