| Literature DB >> 28197032 |
Amilal Bhat1, Mahakshit Bhat2, Rajeev Kumar2, Akshita Bhat3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The main disadvantage of currently described techniques of spongioplasty is superimposition of 3 suture lines (neourethra, spongioplasty, and skin closure) which is likely to increase the chances of a fistula. We describe and evaluate the results of a double breasting spongioplasty in urethroplasty.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28197032 PMCID: PMC5264195 DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.194785
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Urol ISSN: 0970-1591
Figure 1Operative photograph showing steps of double breasting of corpus spongiosum. (a) Distal penile hypospadias. (b) Mobilization of spongiosum from corpus cavernosum on the right side. (c) Mobilization of spongiosum from corpus cavernosum the on left side. (d) Mobilization of spongiosum into glans and tubularization of urethral plate. (e-g) Suturing the left spongiosal pillar lateral to suture line tubularized urethral plate. (h-j) Suturing the right spongiosal pillar over the sutured lateral spongiosal pillar covering the suture line
Figure 2Diagrammatic representation of double breasting of corpus spongiosum (a) Incised urethral plate after mobilization. (b) tubularized urethral plate. (c) spongioplasty started with left side keeping suture line laterally (d) Left side spongioplasty completed (e and f) double breasting of Right side spongiosum over sutured left side spongiosum
Figure 3Operative photograph showing double breasting of corpus spongiosum (a) mobilized urethral plate with spongiosum (b and c). Tubularization of urethral plate (d and e) suturing the left spongiosal Pillar over tubularized urethral plate (e) Right spongiosal pillar covering over the sutured left spongiosal pillar and (g and h) the double breasting of Right spongiosal pillar over Left and completetion of spongioplasty
Correlation of variables and complications
Fistula rate with spongioplasty in incised plate urethroplasty