Literature DB >> 28196604

Addition of bioactive glass to glass ionomer cements: Effect on the physico-chemical properties and biocompatibility.

T De Caluwé1, C W J Vercruysse2, I Ladik2, R Convents2, H Declercq3, L C Martens4, R M H Verbeeck2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Glass ionomer cements (GICs) are a subject of research because of their inferior mechanical properties, despite their advantages such as fluoride release and direct bonding to bone and teeth. Recent research aims to improve the bioactivity of the GICs and thereby improve mechanical properties on the long term. In this study, two types of bioactive glasses (BAG) (45S5F and CF9) are combined with GICs to evaluate the physico-chemical properties and biocompatibility of the BAG-GIC combinations. The effect of the addition of Al3+ to the BAG composition and the use of smaller BAG particles on the BAG-GIC properties was also investigated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conventional aluminosilicate glass (ASG) and (modified) BAG were synthesized by the melt method. BAG-GIC were investigated on setting time, compressive strength and bioactivity. Surface changes were evaluated by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), EDS and PO43- -and Ca2+ uptake in SBF. Biocompatibility of selected BAG-GICs was determined by a direct toxicity assay.
RESULTS: The addition of BAG improves the bioactivity of the GIC, which can be observed by the formation of an apatite (Ap) layer, especially in CF9-containing GICs. More BAG leads to more bioactivity but decreases strength. The addition of Al3+ to the BAG composition improves strength, but decreases bioactivity. BAGs with smaller particle sizes have no effect on bioactivity and decrease strength. The formation of an Ap layer seems beneficial to the biocompatibility of the BAG-GICs. SIGNIFICANCE: Bioactive GICs may have several advantages over conventional GICs, such as remineralization of demineralized tissue, adhesion and proliferation of bone- and dental cells, allowing integration in surrounding tissue. CF9 BAG-GIC combinations containing maximum 10mol% Al3+ are most promising, when added in ≤20wt% to a GIC.
Copyright © 2017 The Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apatite; Bioactive glass; Bioactivity; Biocompatibility; Fluoride; Glass ionomer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28196604     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  15 in total

1.  Study of the chemical interaction between a high-viscosity glass ionomer cement and dentin.

Authors:  Shelyn Akari Yamakami; Adriana Lemos Mori Ubaldini; Francielle Sato; Antonio Medina Neto; Renata Correa Pascotto; Mauro Luciano Baesso
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 2.698

2.  Effects of Chlorhexidine-Encapsulated Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles on the Anti-Biofilm and Mechanical Properties of Glass Ionomer Cement.

Authors:  Huiyi Yan; Hongye Yang; Kang Li; Jian Yu; Cui Huang
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Modifications of Glass Ionomer Cement Powder by Addition of Recently Fabricated Nano-Fillers and Their Effect on the Properties: A Review.

Authors:  Imran Alam Moheet; Norhayati Luddin; Ismail Ab Rahman; Thirumulu Ponnuraj Kannan; Nik Rozainah Nik Abd Ghani; Saman Malik Masudi
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2019-07-07

4.  Comparative Evaluation of Osteogenic Potential of Conventional Glass-ionomer Cement with Chitosan-modified Glass-ionomer and Bioactive Glass-modified Glass-ionomer Cement An In vitro Study.

Authors:  Muthukrishnan Sudharshana Ranjani; Mahendran Kavitha; Srinivasan Venkatesh
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2021-03-20

5.  Aluminum-free glass ionomer cements containing 45S5 Bioglass® and its bioglass-ceramic.

Authors:  Alireza Zandi Karimi; Ehsan Rezabeigi; Robin A L Drew
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Comparative Surface Morphology, Chemical Composition, and Cytocompatibility of Bio-C Repair, Biodentine, and ProRoot MTA on hDPCs.

Authors:  James Ghilotti; José Luis Sanz; Sergio López-García; Julia Guerrero-Gironés; María P Pecci-Lloret; Adrián Lozano; Carmen Llena; Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Lozano; Leopoldo Forner; Gianrico Spagnuolo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-10       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  In Vitro Evaluation of the Biological Effects of ACTIVA Kids BioACTIVE Restorative, Ionolux, and Riva Light Cure on Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells.

Authors:  Sergio López-García; María P Pecci-Lloret; Miguel R Pecci-Lloret; Ricardo E Oñate-Sánchez; David García-Bernal; Pablo Castelo-Baz; Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Lozano; Julia Guerrero-Gironés
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Biomodification of a Class-V Restorative Material by Incorporation of Bioactive Agents.

Authors:  Tahani Binaljadm; Robert Moorehead; Thafar Almela; Kirsty Franklin; Lobat Tayebi; Keyvan Moharamzadeh
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-29

9.  Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation and Microleakage of Three Glass Ionomer-Based Class V Restorations: In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Maha M Ebaya; Ashraf I Ali; Salah H Mahmoud
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2019-12-31

10.  Kinetics of ion release from a conventional glass-ionomer cement.

Authors:  John W Nicholson; Nichola J Coleman; Sharanbir K Sidhu
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.