Jan M Wit1, John H Himes2, Stef van Buuren3,4, Donna M Denno5, Parminder S Suchdev6. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. 2. Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. 3. Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research TNO, Leiden, the Netherlands. 4. Department of Methodology and Statistics, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. 5. Departments of Pediatrics and Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. 6. Department of Pediatrics and Hubert Department of Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Childhood stunting is a prevalent problem in low- and middle-income countries and is associated with long-term adverse neurodevelopment and health outcomes. In this review, we define indicators of growth, discuss key challenges in their analysis and application, and offer suggestions for indicator selection in clinical research contexts. METHODS: Critical review of the literature. RESULTS: Linear growth is commonly expressed as length-for-age or height-for-age z-score (HAZ) in comparison to normative growth standards. Conditional HAZ corrects for regression to the mean where growth changes relate to previous status. In longitudinal studies, growth can be expressed as ΔHAZ at 2 time points. Multilevel modeling is preferable when more measurements per individual child are available over time. Height velocity z-score reference standards are available for children under the age of 2 years. Adjusting for covariates or confounders (e.g., birth weight, gestational age, sex, parental height, maternal education, socioeconomic status) is recommended in growth analyses. CONCLUSION: The most suitable indicator(s) for linear growth can be selected based on the number of available measurements per child and the child's age. By following a step-by-step algorithm, growth analyses can be precisely and accurately performed to allow for improved comparability within and between studies.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Childhood stunting is a prevalent problem in low- and middle-income countries and is associated with long-term adverse neurodevelopment and health outcomes. In this review, we define indicators of growth, discuss key challenges in their analysis and application, and offer suggestions for indicator selection in clinical research contexts. METHODS: Critical review of the literature. RESULTS: Linear growth is commonly expressed as length-for-age or height-for-age z-score (HAZ) in comparison to normative growth standards. Conditional HAZ corrects for regression to the mean where growth changes relate to previous status. In longitudinal studies, growth can be expressed as ΔHAZ at 2 time points. Multilevel modeling is preferable when more measurements per individual child are available over time. Height velocity z-score reference standards are available for children under the age of 2 years. Adjusting for covariates or confounders (e.g., birth weight, gestational age, sex, parental height, maternal education, socioeconomic status) is recommended in growth analyses. CONCLUSION: The most suitable indicator(s) for linear growth can be selected based on the number of available measurements per child and the child's age. By following a step-by-step algorithm, growth analyses can be precisely and accurately performed to allow for improved comparability within and between studies.
Authors: Roseline Remans; Paul M Pronyk; Jessica C Fanzo; Jiehua Chen; Cheryl A Palm; Bennett Nemser; Maria Muniz; Alex Radunsky; Alem Hadera Abay; Mouctar Coulibaly; Joseph Mensah-Homiah; Margaret Wagah; Xiaoyi An; Christine Mwaura; Eva Quintana; Marie-Andree Somers; Pedro A Sanchez; Sonia E Sachs; John W McArthur; Jeffrey D Sachs Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2011-10-26 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Stephanie A Richard; Benjamin J J McCormick; Mark A Miller; Laura E Caulfield; William Checkley Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2014-11-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: P S Blair; P Nadin; T J Cole; P J Fleming; I J Smith; M W Platt; P J Berry; J Golding Journal: Arch Dis Child Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 3.791
Authors: Gretchen A Stevens; Mariel M Finucane; Christopher J Paciorek; Seth R Flaxman; Richard A White; Abigail J Donner; Majid Ezzati Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-07-05 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Aryeh D Stein; Fernando C Barros; Santosh K Bhargava; Wei Hao; Bernardo L Horta; Nanette Lee; Christopher W Kuzawa; Reynaldo Martorell; Siddarth Ramji; Alan Stein; Linda Richter Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2013-09-21 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Anna M Aceituno; Kaitlyn K Stanhope; Paulina A Rebolledo; Rachel M Burke; Rita Revollo; Volga Iñiguez; Parminder S Suchdev; Juan S Leon Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-11-28 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Najeeha T Iqbal; Sana Syed; Kamran Sadiq; Marium N Khan; Junaid Iqbal; Jennie Z Ma; Fayaz Umrani; Sheraz Ahmed; Elizabeth A Maier; Lee A Denson; Yael Haberman; Monica M McNeal; Kenneth D R Setchell; Xueheng Zhao; Shahida Qureshi; Lanlan Shen; Christopher A Moskaluk; Ta-Chiang Liu; Omer Yilmaz; Donald E Brown; Michael J Barratt; Vanderlene L Kung; Jeffrey I Gordon; Sean R Moore; S Asad Ali Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2019-07-22 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Joel Conkle; Usha Ramakrishnan; Rafael Flores-Ayala; Parminder S Suchdev; Reynaldo Martorell Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-12-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Michael Leung; Nandita Perumal; Elnathan Mesfin; Aditi Krishna; Seungmi Yang; William Johnson; Diego G Bassani; Daniel E Roth Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lina M C Lobo; Raquel M Schincaglia; Maria do Rosário G Peixoto; Maria Claret C M Hadler Journal: Nutrients Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 5.717