| Literature DB >> 28195224 |
Tsan-Yao Chen1,2, Yanhui Zhang3, Liang-Ching Hsu4, Alice Hu3, Yu Zhuang3, Chia-Ming Fan1,5, Cheng-Yu Wang6, Tsui-Yun Chung7, Cheng-Si Tsao7, Haw-Yeu Chuang8.
Abstract
This study demonstrates that the hydrogen storage rate (HSR) of nanoporous carbon supported platinum nanocatalysts (NC) is determined by their heterojunction and geometric configurations. The present NC is synthesized in an average particle size of ~1.5 nm by incipient wetness impregnation of Pt4+ at carbon support followed by annealing in H2 ambient at 102-105 °C. Among the steps in hydrogen storage, decomposition of H2 molecule into 2 H atoms on Pt NC surface is the deciding factor in HSR that is controlled by the thickness of Pt NC. For the best condition, HSR of Pt NC in 1~2 atomic layers thick (4.7 μg/g min) is 2.6 times faster than that (1.3 μg/g min) of Pt NC with higher than 3 atomic layers thick.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28195224 PMCID: PMC5307954 DOI: 10.1038/srep42438
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1XRD patterns of Pt doped nanoporous active carbon annealed at (a) 105 °C and (b) 130 °C. The spectra were collected before and after HP-TGA.
Figure 2(a) Small angle X-ray scattering spectra of Pt cluster doped nanoporous carbon materials and (b) corresponding particle Bi-model Shultz size distribution of supported Pt clusters.
Figure 3Pt L3-edge (a) X-ray absorption near-edge spectra and (b) extended X-ray absorption fine structure spectra of Pt cluster doped nanoporous carbon materials and CNT supported Pt NP.
Linear combination fitting method determined chemical composition of Pt cluster doped nanoporous carbon samples Pt/ACs.
| Sample | ΔE (eV) | Pt (%) | PtIIO (%) | PtIVO2 (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INER_A | 1.75 | 20.3 (4.1) | 37.5 (4.6) | 42.1 (6.1) |
| INER_B | 0.70 | 57.1 (1.7) | 17.1 (1.7) | 25.8 (2.4) |
*ΔE: the energy difference of first deviation maximum between samples and standard Pt foil.
EXAFS model simulated atomic structure parameters of Pt cluster doped nanoporous carbon samples (Pt/ACs) and CNT supported Pt NP (CNT@Pt).
| Sample | Path | CN | CN ideal | R (Å) | ΔR (Å) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNT@Pt | Pt-O | 0.60 | 2 | 1.969 | 0.054 |
| Pt-Pt | 6.14 | 12 | 2.726 | −0.046 | |
| INER_A | Pt-O1 | 1.86 | 2 | 1.972 | 0.056 |
| Pt-O2 | 2.87 | 4 | 2.079 | 0.056 | |
| INER_B | Pt-O1 | 1.31 | 2 | 1.922 | 0.006 |
| Pt-Pt | 2.01 | 12 | 2.754 | −0.018 |
*Pt-Pt bond pair of metallic Pt fcc phase.
Figure 4(a) Schemes for octahedron (h, a, b, c1, c2, and c3 denote the height, two axis in horizontal plan, and side lengths of triangle planes in octahedron) and disk-like (H and D denote the thickness and diameter of disk crystal) and (b) surface to bulk ratio (η) of octahedron and disk like crystals as a function of h or H, where H 1, 2, 3, 6 layers denote η of disk crystal with corresponding atomic layer in thickness.
XRD determined crystal structure parameters of Pt cluster doped nanoporous carbon materials.
| Sample | Peak | HP-TGA | 2θ | Index | Δ2θ red | havg (Å) | Δhavg (%) | d (Å) | HX/HD and Δ (HX/HD) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INER_A | A | X | 39.7 | Pt (111) | 4.779 | 9.2 | −17.4 | 2.28 | HX/HD-X | 0.28 |
| O | 39.3 | Pt (111) | 5.808 | 7.6 | 2.3 | HX/HD-O | 0.22 | |||
| B | X | 43.2 | PtO (110)/PtO2(002) | 3.345 | 13.4 | −9.0 | 2.1 | Δ (HX/HD) | 22.2% | |
| O | 43.2 | PtO (110)/PtO2(002) | 3.676 | 12.2 | 2.1 | |||||
| C | X | 46 | Pt (200) | 4.522 | 10.2 | 11.8 | 1.98 | |||
| O | 46.3 | Pt (200) | 3.97 | 11.4 | 1.97 | |||||
| INER_B | A | X | 39.4 | Pt (111) | 3.97 | 11.1 | 8.1 | 2.3 | HX/HD-X | 1.67 |
| O | 39.5 | Pt (111) | 3.676 | 12 | 2.29 | HX/HD-O | 1.08 | |||
| B | X | 43.4 | PtO (110)/PtO2(002) | 3.67 | 12.2 | 10.7 | 2.1 | Δ (HX/HD) | 35.4% | |
| O | 43.2 | PtO (110)/PtO2(002) | 3.309 | 13.5 | 2.11 | |||||
| C | X | 46.3 | Pt (200) | 4.04 | 11.2 | 9.8 | 1.97 | |||
| O | 46.1 | Pt (200) | 3.676 | 12.3 | 1.98 | |||||
*X: before HP-TGA test, O: after HP-TGA test. HX/HD-X and HX/HD-O denote the HX/HD value before and after HP_TGA test.
Figure 5DFT simulated atomic structures of two H atoms adsorbed on sorption sites of (a) one atomic layer Pt on carbon (1PtAC) and (2) 2 atomic layers of Pt on carbon (2PtAC).
DFT calculation determined energies of H2 mole and H atoms in NP surface containing different atomic layers of Pt atom in top of graphite structure.
| Model | Ec** (eV) | Ecf *** (eV) | Ea (eV) | RPt-Hh (Å) | RPt-Hb (Å) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H2 in vacuum | H2 in sorption site | Pt-H at sorption site | |||
| 1PtAC | −1.767 | −2.023 | −2.043 | 1.540 | 1.740 |
| 2PtAC | −1.185 | −1.255 | −1.117 | 1.804/1.980 | 1.742/1.836 |
*For mode with lowest energy, H adsorbed in atop sites of 1PtAC and hollow sites in 2PtAC; Ec: cohesive energy of model; Ecf: cohesive energy of model for H adsorbed PtAC slab after relaxation; Ea: sorption energy of Pt-H in sorption sites; RPt-Hh: Pt-H bond length (H at hollow site); RPt-Hb: Pt-H bond length (H at bridge site).
Figure 6Schematic representations to Pt atom restructure in HP-TGA analysis for (a) INER_A and (b) INER_B.
Physical Characteristics and hydrogen storage rate (HSR) of experimental Pt doped nanoporous carbon materials.
| Sample | Pt treatment temperature | SSA (m2 g−1) | Pt loading (wt%) | HSR (μg/g min) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INER_A | 102 °C | 1886 | 0.35 | 4.7 |
| INER_B | 130 °C | 1857 | 0.11 | 1.3 |
*SSA: BET determined specific surface area, data quoted from previous studies678.