Literature DB >> 28194977

Spectral Counting Approach to Measure Selectivity of High-Resolution LC-MS Methods for Environmental Analysis.

Justin B Renaud1, Lyne Sabourin1, Edward Topp1, Mark W Sumarah1.   

Abstract

Advances in high-resolution mass spectrometers have allowed for the development of nontargeted screening methods, where data sets can be archived and retrospectively mined as new environmental contaminants are identified. We have developed a spectral counting approach to calculate the selectivities of LC-MS acquisition modes taking mass accuracy, sample matrix, and the analyte properties into account. The selectivities of high-resolution MS (HRMS) alone or in combination with all-ion-fragmentation (AIF), data-independent-acquisition (DIA), and data-dependent-acquisition (DDA) modes, performed on a Q-Exactive Orbitrap were compared by retrospectively screening surface water samples for 95 pharmaceuticals. Samples were reanalyzed using targeted LC-MS/MS to confirm the accuracy of each acquisition method and to quantitate the 29 putatively detected drugs. LC-HRMS provided the lowest calculated selectivities and accordingly produced the highest number of false positives (6). In contrast, DDA provided the highest selectivities, yielding only one false positive; however, it was bias toward the most intense signals resulting in the detection of only 10 compounds. AIF had lower selectivities than traditional LC-MS/MS, produced one false positive and did not detect 6 confirmed compounds. Because of the high-quality archived data, DIA selectivities were better than traditional LC-MS/MS, showed no bias toward the most intense signals, achieved low limits of detection, and confidently detected the greatest number of pharmaceuticals (22) with only one false positive. This spectral counting method can be used across different instrument platforms or samples and provides a robust and empirical estimation of selectivities to give more confident detection of trace analytes.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28194977     DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  3 in total

1.  Nontargeted Analysis Study Reporting Tool: A Framework to Improve Research Transparency and Reproducibility.

Authors:  Katherine T Peter; Allison L Phillips; Ann M Knolhoff; Piero R Gardinali; Carlos A Manzano; Kelsey E Miller; Manuel Pristner; Lyne Sabourin; Mark W Sumarah; Benedikt Warth; Jon R Sobus
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 8.008

2.  Chemical Differentiation and Quantitative Analysis of Different Types of Panax Genus Stem-Leaf Based on a UPLC-Q-Exactive Orbitrap/MS Combined with Multivariate Statistical Analysis Approach.

Authors:  Lele Li; Yang Wang; Yang Xiu; Shuying Liu
Journal:  J Anal Methods Chem       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.193

Review 3.  Development and Limitations of Exposure Biomarkers to Dietary Contaminants Mycotoxins.

Authors:  Paul C Turner; Jessica A Snyder
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.546

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.