Literature DB >> 2819497

Behavioural differences between laying hen populations selected for high and low efficiency of food utilisation.

B O Braastad1, J Katle.   

Abstract

1. The effects on behaviour of selecting light-hybrid laying hens for high and low efficiency of food utilisation were investigated. Efficiency of food utilisation was measured as the proportional deviation of observed food consumption from expected food consumption. 2. Videograms of the day-time behaviour of 48 to 53-week-old individually caged hens from the F3 generation were analysed by instantaneous sampling. 3. Low-efficiency hens spent more time food-pecking, walking, pacing, and showing escape and aggressive behaviour than did high-efficiency hens. High-efficiency hens spent more than twice as much time resting and sleeping, and were never observed pacing prior to laying. 4. These differences were larger during the 2 h before laying than at other times of day. 5. Low-efficiency hens had poorer plumage, especially on the neck and the breast, and the poorer the plumage the more agitation they showed. 6. Time spent food-pecking was negatively correlated with laying frequency. 7. Differences in the occurrence of specific behaviour patterns, particularly those symptomatic of pre-laying frustration, partly explained differences in efficiency of food utilisation. Selection for higher efficiency of food utilisation might eliminate hens which are most frustrated prior to laying in cages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2819497     DOI: 10.1080/00071668908417177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Poult Sci        ISSN: 0007-1668            Impact factor:   2.095


  7 in total

1.  Influence of genetic strain and access to litter on spatial distribution of 4 strains of laying hens in an aviary system.

Authors:  A B A Ali; D L M Campbell; D M Karcher; J M Siegford
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Impact of selection for residual feed intake on production traits and behavior of mule ducks.

Authors:  L Drouilhet; R Monteville; C Molette; M Lague; A Cornuez; L Canario; E Ricard; H Gilbert
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Feed Supplementation with Red Seaweeds, Chondrus crispus and Sarcodiotheca gaudichaudii, Reduce Salmonella Enteritidis in Laying Hens.

Authors:  Garima Kulshreshtha; Bruce Rathgeber; Janice MacIsaac; Martine Boulianne; Lehoux Brigitte; Glenn Stratton; Nikhil A Thomas; Alan T Critchley; Jeff Hafting; Balakrishnan Prithiviraj
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  A Hypothesis and Review of the Relationship between Selection for Improved Production Efficiency, Coping Behavior, and Domestication.

Authors:  Wendy M Rauw; Anna K Johnson; Luis Gomez-Raya; Jack C M Dekkers
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  The intake pattern and feed preference of layer hens selected for high or low feed conversion ratio.

Authors:  Cameron E F Clark; Yeasmin Akter; Alena Hungerford; Peter Thomson; Mohammed R Islam; Peter J Groves; Cormac J O'Shea
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Systematic analysis of feeding behaviors and their effects on feed efficiency in Pekin ducks.

Authors:  Feng Zhu; Yahui Gao; Fangbin Lin; Jinping Hao; Fangxi Yang; Zhuocheng Hou
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-11-01

7.  A risk assessment of health, production, and resource occupancy for 4 laying hen strains across the lay cycle in a commercial-style aviary system.

Authors:  Ahmed B A Ali; Dana L M Campbell; Janice M Siegford
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.352

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.