Literature DB >> 28194963

msPurity: Automated Evaluation of Precursor Ion Purity for Mass Spectrometry-Based Fragmentation in Metabolomics.

Thomas N Lawson1, Ralf J M Weber1, Martin R Jones1, Andrew J Chetwynd1, Giovanny Rodrı Guez-Blanco1, Riccardo Di Guida1, Mark R Viant1, Warwick B Dunn1.   

Abstract

Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS or MS2) is a widely used approach for structural annotation and identification of metabolites in complex biological samples. The importance of assessing the contribution of the precursor ion within an isolation window for MS2 experiments has been previously detailed in proteomics, where precursor ion purity influences the quality and accuracy of matching to mass spectral libraries, but to date, there has been little attention to this data-processing technique in metabolomics. Here, we present msPurity, a vendor-independent R package for liquid chromatography (LC) and direct infusion (DI) MS2 that calculates a simple metric to describe the contribution of the selected precursor. The precursor purity metric is calculated as "intensity of a selected precursor divided by the summed intensity of the isolation window". The metric is interpolated at the recorded point of MS2 acquisition using bordering full-scan spectra. Isotopic peaks of the selected precursor can be removed, and low abundance peaks that are believed to have limited contribution to the resulting MS2 spectra are removed. Additionally, the isolation efficiency of the mass spectrometer can be taken into account. The package was applied to Data Dependent Acquisition (DDA)-based MS2 metabolomics data sets derived from three metabolomics data repositories. For the 10 LC-MS2 DDA data sets with > ±1 Da isolation windows, the median precursor purity score ranged from 0.67 to 0.96 (scale = 0 to +1). The R package was also used to assess precursor purity of theoretical isolation windows from LC-MS data sets of differing sample types. The theoretical isolation windows being the same width used for an anticipated DDA experiment (±0.5 Da). The most complex sample had a median precursor purity score of 0.46 for the 64,498 XCMS determined features, in comparison to the less spectrally complex sample that had a purity score of 0.66 for 5071 XCMS features. It has been previously reported in proteomics that a purity score of <0.5 can produce unreliable spectra matching results. With this assumption, we show that for complex samples there will be a large number of metabolites where traditional DDA approaches will struggle to provide reliable annotations or accurate matches to mass spectral libraries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28194963     DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  13 in total

1.  BLANKA: an Algorithm for Blank Subtraction in Mass Spectrometry of Complex Biological Samples.

Authors:  Jessica L Cleary; Gordon T Luu; Emily C Pierce; Rachel J Dutton; Laura M Sanchez
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Generic approach for the discovery of drug metabolites in horses based on data-dependent acquisition by liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry and its applications to pharmacokinetic study of daprodustat.

Authors:  Hideaki Ishii; Mariko Shibuya; Kanichi Kusano; Yu Sone; Takahiro Kamiya; Ai Wakuno; Hideki Ito; Kenji Miyata; Fumio Sato; Taisuke Kuroda; Masayuki Yamada; Gary Ngai-Wa Leung
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 4.478

Review 3.  Identification of small molecules using accurate mass MS/MS search.

Authors:  Tobias Kind; Hiroshi Tsugawa; Tomas Cajka; Yan Ma; Zijuan Lai; Sajjan S Mehta; Gert Wohlgemuth; Dinesh Kumar Barupal; Megan R Showalter; Masanori Arita; Oliver Fiehn
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 10.946

4.  Comparative Evaluation of Data Dependent and Data Independent Acquisition Workflows Implemented on an Orbitrap Fusion for Untargeted Metabolomics.

Authors:  Pierre Barbier Saint Hilaire; Kathleen Rousseau; Alexandre Seyer; Sylvain Dechaumet; Annelaure Damont; Christophe Junot; François Fenaille
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2020-04-18

5.  A Perspective and Framework for Developing Sample Type Specific Databases for LC/MS-Based Clinical Metabolomics.

Authors:  Nichole A Reisdorph; Scott Walmsley; Rick Reisdorph
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2019-12-21

6.  Metabolic drift in the aging nervous system is reflected in human cerebrospinal fluid.

Authors:  Kristian Peters; Stephanie Herman; Payam Emami Khoonsari; Joachim Burman; Steffen Neumann; Kim Kultima
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  A Modular and Expandable Ecosystem for Metabolomics Data Annotation in R.

Authors:  Johannes Rainer; Andrea Vicini; Liesa Salzer; Jan Stanstrup; Josep M Badia; Steffen Neumann; Michael A Stravs; Vinicius Verri Hernandes; Laurent Gatto; Sebastian Gibb; Michael Witting
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2022-02-11

8.  Approximating Isotope Distributions of Biomolecule Fragments.

Authors:  Dennis Goldfarb; Michael J Lafferty; Laura E Herring; Wei Wang; Michael B Major
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2018-09-19

9.  Feature-based molecular networking in the GNPS analysis environment.

Authors:  Louis-Félix Nothias; Daniel Petras; Robin Schmid; Kai Dührkop; Johannes Rainer; Abinesh Sarvepalli; Ivan Protsyuk; Madeleine Ernst; Hiroshi Tsugawa; Markus Fleischauer; Fabian Aicheler; Alexander A Aksenov; Oliver Alka; Pierre-Marie Allard; Aiko Barsch; Xavier Cachet; Andres Mauricio Caraballo-Rodriguez; Ricardo R Da Silva; Tam Dang; Neha Garg; Julia M Gauglitz; Alexey Gurevich; Giorgis Isaac; Alan K Jarmusch; Zdeněk Kameník; Kyo Bin Kang; Nikolas Kessler; Irina Koester; Ansgar Korf; Audrey Le Gouellec; Marcus Ludwig; Christian Martin H; Laura-Isobel McCall; Jonathan McSayles; Sven W Meyer; Hosein Mohimani; Mustafa Morsy; Oriane Moyne; Steffen Neumann; Heiko Neuweger; Ngoc Hung Nguyen; Melissa Nothias-Esposito; Julien Paolini; Vanessa V Phelan; Tomáš Pluskal; Robert A Quinn; Simon Rogers; Bindesh Shrestha; Anupriya Tripathi; Justin J J van der Hooft; Fernando Vargas; Kelly C Weldon; Michael Witting; Heejung Yang; Zheng Zhang; Florian Zubeil; Oliver Kohlbacher; Sebastian Böcker; Theodore Alexandrov; Nuno Bandeira; Mingxun Wang; Pieter C Dorrestein
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 10.  The metaRbolomics Toolbox in Bioconductor and beyond.

Authors:  Jan Stanstrup; Corey D Broeckling; Rick Helmus; Nils Hoffmann; Ewy Mathé; Thomas Naake; Luca Nicolotti; Kristian Peters; Johannes Rainer; Reza M Salek; Tobias Schulze; Emma L Schymanski; Michael A Stravs; Etienne A Thévenot; Hendrik Treutler; Ralf J M Weber; Egon Willighagen; Michael Witting; Steffen Neumann
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2019-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.