Literature DB >> 28194635

Using the Slug Mucosal Irritation Assay to Investigate the Tolerability of Tablet Excipients on Human Skin in the Context of the Use of a Nipple Shield Delivery System.

Richard Kendall1, Joke Lenoir2, Stephen Gerrard3, Rebekah L Scheuerle3, Nigel K H Slater3, Catherine Tuleu4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Neonates are particularly challenging to treat. A novel patented drug delivery device containing a rapidly disintegrating tablet held within a modified nipple shield (NSDS) was designed to deliver medication to infants during breastfeeding. However concerns exist around dermatological nipple tolerability with no pharmaceutical safety assessment guidance to study local tissue tolerance of the nipple and the areola. This is the first Slug Mucosal Irritation (SMI) study to evaluate irritancy potential of GRAS excipients commonly used to manufacture rapidly disintegrating immediate release solid oral dosage form
METHODS: Zinc sulphate selected as the antidiarrheal model drug that reduces infant mortality, was blended with functional excipients at traditional levels [microcrystalline cellulose, sodium starch glycolate, croscarmellose sodium, magnesium stearate]. Slugs were exposed to blends slurried in human breast milk to assess their stinging, itching or burning potential, using objective values such as mucus production to categorize irritation potency
RESULTS: Presently an in vivo assay, previously validated for prediction of ocular and nasal irritation, was used as an alternative to vertebrate models to anticipate the potential maternal dermatological tolerability issues to NSDS tablet components. The excipients did not elicit irritancy. However, mild irritancy was observed when zinc sulphate was present in blends.
CONCLUSION: These promising good tolerability results support the continued investigation of these excipients within NSDS rapidly disintegrating tablet formulations. Topical local tolerance effects being almost entirely limited to irritation, the slug assay potentially adds to the existing preformulation toolbox, and may sit in between the in vitro and existing in vivo assays.

Entities:  

Keywords:  nipple shield delivery system; pediatric; skin tolerability; slug mucosal irritation assay; tablet excipients

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28194635     DOI: 10.1007/s11095-016-1997-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  26 in total

1.  Ocular bioerodible minitablets as strategy for the management of microbial keratitis.

Authors:  Wim Weyenberg; An Vermeire; Marijke M M Dhondt; Els Adriaens; Philippe Kestelyn; Jean Paul Remon; Annick Ludwig
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Letter to the Editor regarding "Acceptability of a Nipple Shield Delivery System Administering Antiviral Agents to Prevent Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV through Breastfeeding".

Authors:  Sally Etheridge
Journal:  J Hum Lact       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.219

Review 3.  Neonatal medicines research: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Janko Samardzic; Mark A Turner; Ralph Bax; Karel Allegaert
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 4.481

4.  The evaluation of the local tolerance of vaginal formulations containing dapivirine using the Slug Mucosal Irritation test and the rabbit vaginal irritation test.

Authors:  Marijke M M Dhondt; Els Adriaens; Jens Van Roey; Jean Paul Remon
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.571

Review 5.  Playing hide and seek with poorly tasting paediatric medicines: do not forget the excipients.

Authors:  Jennifer Walsh; Anne Cram; Katharina Woertz; Joerg Breitkreutz; Gesine Winzenburg; Roy Turner; Catherine Tuleu
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 15.470

6.  The slug mucosal irritation (SMI) assay: development of a screening tool for the evaluation of ocular discomfort caused by shampoos.

Authors:  Joke Lenoir; Ilse Claerhout; Philippe Kestelyn; Andre Klomp; Jean-Paul Remon; Els Adriaens
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Toxicological evaluation of a bioadhesive nasal powder containing a starch and Carbopol 974 P on rabbit nasal mucosa and slug mucosa.

Authors:  C Callens; E Adriaens; K Dierckens; J P Remon
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2001-09-11       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  Modeling the physiological factors that affect drug delivery from a nipple shield delivery system to breastfeeding infants.

Authors:  Stephen E Gerrard; Mine Orlu-Gul; Catherine Tuleu; Nigel K H Slater
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2013-08-11       Impact factor: 3.534

9.  Tongue movement and intra-oral vacuum in breastfeeding infants.

Authors:  Donna T Geddes; Jacqueline C Kent; Leon R Mitoulas; Peter E Hartmann
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Milk as a medium for pediatric formulations: Experimental findings and regulatory aspects.

Authors:  Konstantina Soulele; Panos Macheras
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.875

View more
  1 in total

1.  Potential Mucosal Irritation Discrimination of Surface Disinfectants Employed against SARS-CoV-2 by Limacus flavus Slug Mucosal Irritation Assay.

Authors:  Marco Alfio Cutuli; Antonio Guarnieri; Laura Pietrangelo; Irene Magnifico; Noemi Venditti; Laura Recchia; Katia Mangano; Ferdinando Nicoletti; Roberto Di Marco; Giulio Petronio Petronio
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-04-14
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.