| Literature DB >> 28194424 |
Zhenhua Yang1, Yue Zhao1, Zhiyong Liu1, Chenfeng Liu1, Zhipeng Hu1, Yuyong Hou1.
Abstract
Microalgae are considered to be a potential major biomass feedstock for biofuel due to their high lipid content. However, no correlation equations as a function of initial nitrogen concentration for lipid accumulation have been developed for simplicity to predict lipid production and optimize the lipid production process. In this study, a lipid accumulation model was developed with simple parameters based on the assumption protein synthesis shift to lipid synthesis by a linear function of nitrogen quota. The model predictions fitted well for the growth, lipid content, and nitrogen consumption of Coelastrum sp. HA-1 under various initial nitrogen concentrations. Then the model was applied successfully in Chlorella sorokiniana to predict the lipid content with different light intensities. The quantitative relationship between initial nitrogen concentrations and the final lipid content with sensitivity analysis of the model were also discussed. Based on the model results, the conversion efficiency from protein synthesis to lipid synthesis is higher and higher in microalgae metabolism process as nitrogen decreases; however, the carbohydrate composition content remains basically unchanged neither in HA-1 nor in C. sorokiniana.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28194424 PMCID: PMC5286495 DOI: 10.1155/2017/9253020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Simulation parameter values (a) and simulation R2 (b) under different initial concentrations of NaNO3 for HA-1.
| Parameter | Initial NaNO3 concentration [g L−1] | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.075 | 0.15 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | |
| (a) Parameter values | |||||
|
| 0.313 ± 0.049 | 0.340 ± 0.050 | 0.295 ± 0.064 | 0.300 ± 0.012 | 0.264 ± 0.012 |
|
| −0.624 ± 0.329 | −0.719 ± 0.292 | −1.338 ± 0.436 | −1.289 ± 0.087 | −1.593 ± 0.156 |
|
| 0.298 ± 0.077 | 0.156 ± 0.001 | 0.623 ± 0.181 | 0.410 ± 0.019 | 0.285 ± 0.045 |
|
| 0.002 ± 0.000 | 0.003 ± 0.001 | 0.142 ± 0.025 | 0.327 ± 0.013 | 0.198 ± 0.035 |
|
| 1.454 ± 0.006 | 2.288 ± 0.122 | 4.094 ± 0.226 | 5.946 ± 0.245 | 6.738 ± 0.098 |
|
| 2.119 ± 0.000 | 2.121 ± 0.003 | 2.123 ± 0.001 | 2.122 ± 0.004 | 2.119 ± 0.007 |
|
| 0.436 ± 0.059 | 0.440 ± 0.025 | 0.440 ± 0.023 | 0.440 ± 0.009 | 0.440 ± 0.002 |
| Φ | 0.052 ± 0.040 | 0.050 ± 0.020 | 0.050 ± 0.037 | 0.049 ± 0.006 | 0.050 ± 0.024 |
|
| |||||
| (b) Simulation | |||||
|
| 0.9999 | 0.9925 | 0.9667 | 0.9794 | 0.9858 |
|
| 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.9973 | 0.9999 | 1.0000 |
|
| 0.9995 | 0.9999 | 0.9994 | 0.9989 | 0.9994 |
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simulation parameter values at different light intensities for C. sorokiniana.
| Parameter | Light intensity [ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 50 | 100 | 200 | |
|
| 0.466 | 0.297 | 0.455 |
|
| −1.493 | −1.910 | −1.559 |
|
| 0.285 | 0.285 | 0.285 |
|
| 0.198 | 0.198 | 0.198 |
|
| 1.009 | 1.228 | 0.678 |
|
| 0.735 | 0.775 | 0.746 |
|
| 0.113 | 0.093 | 0.102 |
| Φ | 5.794 | 3.450 | 2.670 |
Figure 1Simulation results versus experimental data for dry weight (a), nitrogen consumption (b), and lipid content (c) of Coelastrum sp. HA-1 at different initial NaNO3 concentrations.
Figure 2Simulation results versus parameter values for the final lipid content of Coelastrum sp. HA-1 (a) and the maximum algal concentration (b) under different initial NaNO3 concentrations.
Figure 3Simulation results of C. sorokiniana versus experimental data for dry weight (a) and predictions of nitrogen consumption (b) and lipid content (c) at different light intensities supplemented.
Figure 4The lipid productivity of Coelastrum sp. HA-1 (a) under various initial NaNO3 concentrations from 0.075 to 0.9 g·L−1 after 24 days and of C. sorokiniana (b) under various light intensities supplemented from 50 to 200 μmol·m−2·s−1 after 7 days.
Figure 5Sensitivity of model inputs without parameter c (carbohydrate content) for C. sorokiniana under 50 (a), 100 (b), and 200 (c) μmol·m−2·s−1. Model inputs were altered by ±20% with lipid content after 24 days compared with baseline lipid content output. Vertical dash lines represent 95% confidence interval.