| Literature DB >> 28194245 |
Artur Wdowiak1, Edyta Wdowiak2, Magdalena Stec3, Iwona Bojar4.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopy is a long-established diagnostic and therapeutic method for treating women suffering from infertility. The application of this method of treatment can help achieve pregnancy only if there is correct classification of patients and evaluation of their partner's reproductive capacity. The main predictors of achieving pregnancy in a couple treated for infertility are the woman's age, her ovarian reserve, tubal patency, the presence of endometriosis and quality of sperm parameters. AIM: To evaluate the effect of endometriosis, ovarian reserve and selected parameters of semen on the effect of achieving pregnancy in patients undergoing laparoscopy.Entities:
Keywords: endometriosis; infertility; laparoscopy; sperm
Year: 2016 PMID: 28194245 PMCID: PMC5299084 DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2016.64640
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne ISSN: 1895-4588 Impact factor: 1.195
Figure 1Comparison of partners’ medium sperm density for patients with and without pregnancy
Figure 2Comparison of the medium percentage of morphologically normal spermatozoa in the sperm of partners of patients with and without pregnancy
Figure 3Comparison of medium progressive motility and medium sperm density of patients with and without pregnancy
Figure 4Comparison of patients’ AMH levels before and after laparoscopy in the examined groups
Figure 5Presence of endometriosis in both groups
Comparison of severity of endometriosis in group with and without pregnancy
| Group |
| Mean | Median | Lower quartile | Upper quartile | Standard deviation |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Where pregnancy was achieved | 136 | 0.90 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 2.0 | 1.26 | –3.215, 0.001 |
| Where no pregnancy was achieved | 122 | 1.47 | 1.0 | 0.00 | 3.0 | 1.46 |
Model of logistic regression of pregnancy predictive factors
| Analyzed variable |
| Wald |
| OR | –95% CI | +95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Partner’s age | –0.025 | 0.661 | 0.416 | 0.976 | 0.920 | 1.035 |
| Density [mln] | 0.028 | 13.001 | < 0.001 | 1.028 | 1.013 | 1.043 |
| % correct | 0.222 | 21.969 | < 0.001 | 1.248 | 1.138 | 1.369 |
| % progressive movement | 0.029 | 10.851 | 0.001 | 1.030 | 1.012 | 1.048 |
| % VIAB | 0.013 | 1.349 | 0.246 | 1.013 | 0.991 | 1.036 |
| % MAR test IgA | 0.021 | 0.564 | 0.453 | 1.021 | 0.967 | 1.077 |
| % MAR test IgG | –0.033 | 0.871 | 0.351 | 0.968 | 0.903 | 1.037 |
| Post-laparoscopy AMH | 0.149 | 3.952 | 0.047 | 1.160 | 1.002 | 1.344 |
| Post-laparoscopy FSH | 0.013 | 0.028 | 0.868 | 1.013 | 0.870 | 1.180 |
| Years of trying to become pregnant | –0.047 | 0.290 | 0.590 | 0.954 | 0.804 | 1.132 |
| Constant | –3.356 | 4.498 | 0.034 | 0.035 |
χ2 = 73.757, df = 10, p < 0.001, R2Nagelkerke = 0.249, R2Cox-Snell = 0.332; Hosmer-Lemeshow test: χ2 = 6.558, df = 8, p = 0.585.