| Literature DB >> 28193291 |
Danielle Andreza da Cruz Ferreira1, Carolin Marlen Degener2, Cecilia de Almeida Marques-Toledo3,4, Maria Mercedes Bendati5, Liane Oliveira Fetzer5, Camila P Teixeira6, Álvaro Eduardo Eiras7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aedes aegypti is an important vector for arboviroses and widely distributed throughout the world. Climatic factors can influence vector population dynamics and, consequently, disease transmission. The aim of this study was to characterize the temporal dynamics of an Ae. aegypti population and dengue cases and to investigate the relationship between meteorological variables and mosquito infestation.Entities:
Keywords: Aedes aegypti; Dengue; MosquiTRAP; Surveillance
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28193291 PMCID: PMC5307865 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-017-2025-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Study area. a Map of the municipality of Porto Alegre (Rio Grande do Sul), southern Brazil. Lines represent the borders of the neighborhoods. The neighborhoods that are monitored are represented with borders in bold. b Locations of MosquiTRAPs in Porto Alegre (Rio Grande do Sul)
Descriptive statistics of mosquitoes caught in MosquiTRAPs (MQT) in Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, between September 2012 and January 2016
| Species/ stage | Total number (%) | Range ( | Mean ± SD |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Female | 53,411 (44.0) | 0–41 | 0.43 ± 1.10 |
| Male | 415 (0.34) | 0–9 | 0.003 ± 0.07 |
|
| |||
| Female | 3,685 (3.0) | 0–13 | 0.03 ± 0.21 |
| Male | 361 (0.3) | 0–8 | 0.003 ± 0.07 |
|
| |||
| Female | 46,261 (38.1) | 0–40 | 0.37 ± 1.10 |
| Male | 17,252 (14.2) | 0–20 | 0.14 ± 0.67 |
Abbreviation: SD standard deviation
Fig. 2Time series of dengue cases, mean number of Aedes aegypti females (MFAI), precipitation, minimum and maximum temperature, and humidity in Porto Alegre, between September 2012 and January 2016
Output of the GAM models M1 and M2, and the logistic regression model M3. M1 and M2 are minimal adequate models to explain mosquito abundance, and M3 is the model to explain presence and absence of dengue cases
| Model | Variable | Estimate | Standard Error |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | Intercept | -1.477 | 0.058 | < 0.001 | |
|
| Smooth | 352.3 | < 0.001 | ||
|
| Smooth | 37.1 | < 0.001 | ||
| M2 | Intercept | -1.590 | 0.038 | < 0.001 | |
|
| Smooth | 27.9 | < 0.001 | ||
|
| Smooth | 296.3 | < 0.001 | ||
|
| |||||
| M3 | Intercept | -2.376 | 0.3835 | -6.196 | < 0.001 |
| MFAIt-3 | 2.298 | 0.499 | 4.599 | < 0.001 |
Fig. 3Graphical representation of the estimated results of the GAM model M1. Effects of minimum temperature lagged by four weeks (Tmint-4) (a) and mean relative humidity lagged by four weeks (humt-4) (b) on female Aedes aegypti catches in MosquiTRAPs. c Plot of observed versus fitted and predicted values
Fig. 4Graphic representation of the estimated results of the GAM model M2. Effects of minimum temperature lagged by four weeks (Tmint-4) (a) and of the mean number of female Ae. aegypti caught in the previous week (MFAIt-1) (b) on female Aedes aegypti catches in MosquiTRAPs. c Plot of observed versus fitted and predicted values
Fig. 5Relationship between the presence and absence of dengue cases and the mean female Aedes index (MFAI). a Box plots of MFAI conditional on dengue occurrence (0, absence of dengue cases; 1, presence of dengue cases). b Graph of the fitted values (solid line) obtained by the logistic regression model applied on the dengue occurrence data. The dots represent the observed values