| Literature DB >> 28193272 |
Aiswarya Chenthamarakshan1, Nayana Parambayil1, Nafeesathul Miziriya1, P S Soumya1, M S Kiran Lakshmi1, Anala Ramgopal1, Anuja Dileep1, Padma Nambisan2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fungal laccase has profound applications in different fields of biotechnology due to its broad specificity and high redox potential. Any successful application of the enzyme requires large scale production. As laccase production is highly dependent on medium components and cultural conditions, optimization of the same is essential for efficient product production.Entities:
Keywords: Laccase; Marasmiellus palmivorus LA1; Optimization; Solid state fermentation; Taguchi DOE
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28193272 PMCID: PMC5307782 DOI: 10.1186/s12896-017-0333-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Biotechnol ISSN: 1472-6750 Impact factor: 2.563
Experimental trial results of all the eight trials conducted
| Trials | Laccase activity (IU/mL ± Standard deviation) |
|---|---|
| 1 | 455.2 ± 1 |
| 2 | 639.9 ± 24 |
| 3 | 542 ± 17 |
| 4 | 557 ± 1 |
| 5 | 659 ± 12 |
| 6 | 458 ± 68 |
| 7 | 606.4 ± 8 |
| 8 | 505.8 ± 29 |
Main effects of all the selected factors
| Sl. No: | Factors | Level 1 | Level 2 | L2 - L1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Temperature (°C) | 54.718 | 54.769 | .05 |
| 2 | pH | 54.662 | 54.825 | .163 |
| 3 | NH4H2PO4 (%)a | 54.741 | 54.746 | .005 |
| 4 | Galactose (%) | 54.967 | 54.52 | -.447 |
| 5 | Cupric sulphate (mM) | 53.721 | 55.766 | 2.045 |
| 6 | Inoculum concentration | 54.626 | 54.861 | .234 |
| 7 | Substrate length (m) | 54.185 | 55.302 | 1.116 |
aPercentage against buffer
Predicted interactions of the given factors depicted via severity index
| Sl. No: | Interacting factor pairs (Order based on SI) | Columns | SI (%) | Col. | Opt. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NH4H2PO4 (%) x Inoculum concen. | 3 × 6 | 89.72 | 5 | [1,2] |
| 2 | Temperature (°C) x Inoculum concen. | 1 × 6 | 82.66 | 7 | [1,2] |
| 3 | Temperature (°C) x Galactose (%) | 1 × 4 | 82.06 | 5 | [2,1] |
| 4 | Temperature (°C) x NH4H2PO4 (%) | 1 × 3 | 76.01 | 2 | [2,1] |
| 5 | NH4H2PO4 (%) x Galactose (%) | 3 × 4 | 71.42 | 7 | [2,1] |
| 6 | pH x Inoculum concen. | 2 × 6 | 65.61 | 4 | [2,2] |
| 7 | pH x Substrate length (m) | 2 × 7 | 64.67 | 5 | [1,2] |
| 8 | pH x Cupric sulphate (mM) | 2 × 5 | 35.32 | 7 | [1,2] |
| 9 | Substrate length (m) x Galactose (%) | 2 × 4 | 34.38 | 6 | [2,1] |
| 10 | NH4H2PO4 (%) x Substrate length (m) | 3 × 7 | 28.57 | 4 | [2,2] |
| 11 | pH x NH4H2PO4 (%) | 2 × 3 | 23.98 | 1 | [2,1] |
| 12 | Galactose (%) x Inoculum concen. | 4 × 6 | 23.92 | 2 | [1,2] |
| 13 | Temperature (°C) x Cupric sulphate (mM) | 1 × 5 | 17.93 | 4 | [2,2] |
| 14 | Temperature (°C) x Substrate length (m) | 1 × 7 | 17.33 | 6 | [1,2] |
| 15 | NH4H2PO4 (%) x Cupric sulphate (mM) | 3 × 5 | 10.27 | 6 | [1,2] |
| 16 | Cupric sulphate (mM) x Substrate length (m) | 5 × 7 | 5.15 | 2 | [2,2] |
| 17 | Inoculum concen. x Substrate length | 6 × 7 | 3.8 | 1 | [2,2] |
| 18 | Temperature (°C) x pH | 1 × 2 | 2.08 | 3 | [2,2] |
| 19 | Galactose (%) x Cupric sulphate (mM) | 4 × 5 | 2.06 | 1 | [1,2] |
| 20 | Galactose (%) x Substrate length (m) | 4 × 7 | .28 | 3 | [1,2] |
| 21 | Cupric sulphate (mM) x Inoculum concen. | 5 × 6 | .19 | 3 | [2,2] |
Columns: Column locations to which the interacting factors are assigned, SI%: Interaction severity index, Col: Column that should be reserved if this particular interaction is to be studied, Opt.: indicates factor levels desirable for the optimum condition
Fig. 1Influence of the selected factors on laccase production by Marasmiellus palmivorus LA1. a Temperature (°C), b pH, c Ammonium dihydrogen phosphate (%), d Galactose (%w/v), e Cupric sulphate (mM), f Inoculum concentration (number of mycelial agar pieces), and g Substrate length (m). In all the graphs X-axis denotes the different levels (1 and 2) of the concerned factor and Y-axis average effect of the concerned factors
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
| Sl.No: | Factors | DOF | Sums of squares | Variance | F-Ratio | Pure Sum | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Temperature (°C) | 1 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 173.585 | 0.006 | 0.060 |
| 2 | pH | 1 | 0.053 | 0.053 | 1,325.232 | 0.053 | 0.464 |
| 3 | NH4H2PO4 (%) | 1 | 0 | POOLED | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | Galactose (%) | 1 | 0.401 | 0.401 | 10,006.075 | 0.401 | 3.510 |
| 5 | Cupric sulphate (mM) | 1 | 8.366 | 8.366 | 208,581.269 | 8.366 | 73.181 |
| 6 | Inoculum concentration | 1 | 0.108 | 0.108 | 2,694.782 | 0.108 | 0.945 |
| 7 | Substrate length (m) | 1 | 2.496 | 2.496 | 62,237.074 | 2.496 | 21.835 |
| Other/Error | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.005 | |||
| Total | 7 | 11.433 | 100.00% |
Fig. 2Contribution of each factors on extracellular enzyme production. Cupric sulphate contributes maximum, covering a large area in the figure while ammonium dihydrogen phosphate fails to contribute any
Optimum culture condition predicted and their contributions on the selected levels
| Sl. No: | Factors | Level description | Level | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Temperature (°C) | 28 | 2 | 0.025 |
| 2 | pH | 5 | 2 | 0.081 |
| 3 | Galactose (%) | 0.8 | 1 | 0.223 |
| 4 | Cupric sulphate (mM) | 3 | 2 | 1.023 |
| 5 | Inoculum concentration | 6 | 2 | 0.117 |
| 6 | Substrate length (m) | 0.05 | 2 | 0.558 |
| Total contribution from all factors | 2.025 | |||
| Current grand average of performance | 54.743 | |||
| Expected result at optimum condition | 56.769 | |||
Fig. 3Variation reduction plot based on current and new, improved conditions. Normal performance distribution profiles for laccase activity with higher improved frequency
Comparison of laccase yields of other fungi with the fungus of interest, grown under solid state fermentation
| Sl. No: | Organism | Substrate | Enzyme activity (IU/mL) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| Banana pseudostem | 3 | [ |
| 2 |
| Banana pseudostem | 3.6 | [ |
| 3 |
| Wheat bran | 25.5 | [ |
| 4 |
| Rice straw | 6.6 | [ |
| 5 |
| Sugarcane baggase | 2.9 | [ |
| 6 |
| Banana stalks | 345 | [ |
| 7 |
| Pineapple leaf | 472.31 ± 41.2 | [ |
| 8 | Coculture of | Coffee pulp | 8.8 | [ |
| 9 |
| Corn stover | 130.80 | [ |
| 10 |
| Wheat straw | 517 ± 1.05 | [ |
| 11 |
| Wheat straw | 263.03 | [ |
| 12 |
| Corn cobs | 869.65 | [ |
| 13 |
| Pine apple leaf | 667.4 ± 13 | Present study |
Selected culture factors and their assigned levels
| Sl.No: | Factors | Level 1 | Level 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Temperature (°C) | 26 | 28 |
| 2 | pH | 3 | 5 |
| 3 | NH4H2PO4 (%) | 0.03 | 0.05 |
| 4 | Galactose (%) | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 5 | Cupric sulphate (mM) | 1 | 3 |
| 6 | Inoculum concentration | 4 | 6 |
| 7 | Substrate length (m) | 0.03 | 0.05 |
L-8 orthogonal array design
| Trials | Columns | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| Trial 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Trial 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Trial 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Trial 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Trial 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Trial 6 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Trial 7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Trial 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |