Literature DB >> 28192761

A comparison of Bayesian and non-linear regression methods for robust estimation of pharmacokinetics in DCE-MRI and how it affects cancer diagnosis.

Nikolaos Dikaios1, David Atkinson2, Chiara Tudisca2, Pierpaolo Purpura2, Martin Forster3, Hashim Ahmed4, Timothy Beale5, Mark Emberton4, Shonit Punwani6.   

Abstract

The aim of this work is to compare Bayesian Inference for nonlinear models with commonly used traditional non-linear regression (NR) algorithms for estimating tracer kinetics in Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI). The algorithms are compared in terms of accuracy, and reproducibility under different initialization settings. Further it is investigated how a more robust estimation of tracer kinetics affects cancer diagnosis. The derived tracer kinetics from the Bayesian algorithm were validated against traditional NR algorithms (i.e. Levenberg-Marquardt, simplex) in terms of accuracy on a digital DCE phantom and in terms of goodness-of-fit (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) on ROI-based concentration time courses from two different patient cohorts. The first cohort consisted of 76 men, 20 of whom had significant peripheral zone prostate cancer (any cancer-core-length (CCL) with Gleason>3+3 or any-grade with CCL>=4mm) following transperineal template prostate mapping biopsy. The second cohort consisted of 9 healthy volunteers and 24 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The diagnostic ability of the derived tracer kinetics was assessed with receiver operating characteristic area under curve (ROC AUC) analysis. The Bayesian algorithm accurately recovered the ground-truth tracer kinetics for the digital DCE phantom consistently improving the Structural Similarity Index (SSIM) across the 50 different initializations compared to NR. For optimized initialization, Bayesian did not improve significantly the fitting accuracy on both patient cohorts, and it only significantly improved the ve ROC AUC on the HN population from ROC AUC=0.56 for the simplex to ROC AUC=0.76. For both cohorts, the values and the diagnostic ability of tracer kinetic parameters estimated with the Bayesian algorithm weren't affected by their initialization. To conclude, the Bayesian algorithm led to a more accurate and reproducible quantification of tracer kinetic parameters in DCE-MRI, improving their ROC-AUC and decreasing their dependence on initialization settings. Crown
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian inference for nonlinear model; DCE analysis; Head and neck; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28192761     DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2017.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph        ISSN: 0895-6111            Impact factor:   4.790


  8 in total

1.  Robust Non-Rigid Motion Compensation of Free-Breathing Myocardial Perfusion MRI Data.

Authors:  Cian M Scannell; Adriana D M Villa; Jack Lee; Marcel Breeuwer; Amedeo Chiribiri
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Robust and efficient pharmacokinetic parameter non-linear least squares estimation for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the prostate.

Authors:  Soudabeh Kargar; Eric A Borisch; Adam T Froemming; Akira Kawashima; Lance A Mynderse; Eric G Stinson; Joshua D Trzasko; Stephen J Riederer
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-12-24       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Efficient DCE-MRI Parameter and Uncertainty Estimation Using a Neural Network.

Authors:  Yannick Bliesener; Jay Acharya; Krishna S Nayak
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Predicting clinically significant prostate cancer from quantitative image features including compressed sensing radial MRI of prostate perfusion using machine learning: comparison with PI-RADS v2 assessment scores.

Authors:  David Jean Winkel; Hanns-Christian Breit; Bibo Shi; Daniel T Boll; Hans-Helge Seifert; Christian Wetterauer
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-04

5.  Direct Comparison of Bayesian and Fermi Deconvolution Approaches for Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification: In silico and Clinical Validations.

Authors:  Clément Daviller; Timothé Boutelier; Shivraman Giri; Hélène Ratiney; Marie-Pierre Jolly; Jean-Paul Vallée; Pierre Croisille; Magalie Viallon
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Physics-informed neural networks for myocardial perfusion MRI quantification.

Authors:  Rudolf L M van Herten; Amedeo Chiribiri; Marcel Breeuwer; Mitko Veta; Cian M Scannell
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 13.828

7.  Bayesian modeling of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI data in cerebral glioma patients improves the diagnostic quality of hemodynamic parameter maps.

Authors:  Anna Tietze; Anne Nielsen; Irene Klærke Mikkelsen; Mikkel Bo Hansen; Annette Obel; Leif Østergaard; Kim Mouridsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Robust estimation of hemo-dynamic parameters in traditional DCE-MRI models.

Authors:  Mikkel B Hansen; Anna Tietze; Søren Haack; Jesper Kallehauge; Irene K Mikkelsen; Leif Østergaard; Kim Mouridsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.